Mass Maker vs Serious Mass

Y2Yzir13 · 02-24-2005, 12:58 PM

I can't decide which of these two to get. The main difference I noticed is a serving of Mass Maker only has 350 calories with 8 oz skim milk where as Serious Mass has 1250 calories per serving. Serious Mass has a few more grams of fat and 30 more grams of protein. It also has 40 grams of sugars compared to the 2 grams in Mass Maker. I need to bulk so I would think the more calories the better, but today my teacher who is a strength and conditioning coach told me how great Mass Maker has been for him. He also told me how all the simple sugars are not good for me. Which of these two do you think will benfit me the most? Thanks

crazy_enough · 02-24-2005, 01:02 PM

most comemrcial mass gainers are just that sugar!! Not the best alternative if u ask me..there are recipes out there for homemade weight gainers, much better for you!

ihateschoolmt · 02-24-2005, 01:03 PM

You don't want simple sugars, unless it's right before your workout, even then I think it's supposed to be fructose and not sucrose.

**Mudge** · 02-24-2005, 01:06 PM

Protein + Maltodextrin = weight gainer.

Sacto95827 · 02-24-2005, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mudge

Protein + Maltodextrin = weight gainer.

How much should you mix of each with each serving?

musclepump · 02-24-2005, 02:24 PM

Serious Mass has pretty low sugar. I used it and *loved* it. Tasted damn, damn good.

02-24-2005, 12:58 PM	#1
Y2Yzir13 Registered User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 30	Mass Maker vs Serious Mass I can't decide which of these two to get. The main difference I noticed is a serving of Mass Maker only has 350 calories with 8 oz skim milk where as Serious Mass has 1250 calories per serving. Serious Mass has a few more grams of fat and 30 more grams of protein. It also has 40 grams of sugars compared to the 2 grams in Mass Maker. I need to bulk so I would think the more calories the better, but today my teacher who is a strength and conditioning coach told me how great Mass Maker has been for him. He also told me how all the simple sugars are not good for me. Which of these two do you think will benfit me the most? Thanks
Y2Yzir13 Registered User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 30

02-24-2005, 01:02 PM	#2
crazy_enough IM lesbo extraordinaire Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: 3654322436751302 weeks out Posts: 2,423 Photos: 18	most comemrcial mass gainers are just that sugar!! Not the best alternative if u ask me..there are recipes out there for homemade weight gainers, much better for you!
	Life is what you make of it, not what it makes you...TAKE CHARGE! http://www.boners.com/content/791433.1.jpg

02-24-2005, 01:06 PM	#4
Mudge Pizza the Hut Super Moderator Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 22,997 Photos: 1	Protein + Maltodextrin = weight gainer.
	Kinesiology Vote @ Top 25 Deads Comp Bench Motivation Bench form MaxCalc Charles Poliquin When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be. Lao-Tzu I don't know any sources so don't ask - thanks

02-24-2005, 02:24 PM	#6
musclepump Celebrity PersonalTrainer Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 6,664 Photos: 128	Serious Mass has pretty low sugar. I used it and loved it. Tasted damn, damn good.
	Let's all join together and SPEAK ENGLISH IN AMERICA.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

02-24-2005, 01:03 PM	#3
ihateschoolmt Senior Member Elite Member Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: North Carolina Posts: 3,796 Photos: 10	You don't want simple sugars, unless it's right before your workout, even then I think it's supposed to be fructose and not sucrose.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
ON Serious Mass???	fieldmedic	Training	4	12-02-2004 12:44 AM
??ON Serious Mass Powder	fieldmedic	Supplements	2	12-01-2004 11:09 PM
165 looking to gain 20 pounds with Serious Mass and Creatine	Callingitquits	Diet & Nutrition	5	10-27-2004 09:49 PM
5 Keys to Building Serious Muscle Mass Fast	BabsieGirl	Training	0	10-17-2003 12:11 PM
Can I sub egg protein for whey with Mass Maker?	SVB99	Supplements	1	09-07-2002 12:55 AM