Reply With QuoteIf your wanting some size and strength I personally would go with one of the Halo combo's.
Which would produce the better results?
Results 1 to 11 of 11
-
08-27-2008, 08:13 PM #1Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- u.s.a
- Posts
- 624
- Rep Points
- 10
Which would produce the better results?
Diet is on...lifting is on point, PCT in order. Not a first timer, had done the old Ergo 1-AD/4-AD stack few years ago. JUst looking to see an opinion on the one that may produce the better results.
1) CEL Halo-50/E-stane 5 weeks
2)CEL Halo-50/Havoc 5 weeks
3)Tren/E-stane 5 wks
4)Tren/Havoc 5 weeks
I know Havoc and E-stane are the same(at least in theory). Any difference at all or preference by anybody on one or the other of these 2? Not looking for huge mass gains, thus the stack with 2 dry supps in them. Just seeing if anyone like the possibilities of one of these over the other.
-
08-28-2008, 07:23 AM #2Senior Member ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Power Rack
- Posts
- 2,303
- Rep Points
- 1238818
-
08-28-2008, 11:08 AM #3Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- u.s.a
- Posts
- 624
- Rep Points
- 10
WOuld it matter if it were with the Havoc or E-stane?? Seems I have heard or read on here that the Havoc has wreaked a little more chaos on people such as hairloss etc. than say the E-stane or Epistane?? Is the Havoc ANY different at all?? Thanks.
-
08-28-2008, 02:24 PM #4Founder of GOSB SUPER MODERATOR
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Gender
- Location
- Down by the River
- Posts
- 20,175
- Rep Points
- 413505227
No, they are exactly the same.....Havoc(trade name) is epistane(chemical name)
I just got some CEL e-stane from sbmuscle
Competitive Edge Labs E-Stane 90 caps
Disclaimer: All health, fitness, diet, nutrition, anabolic steroid & supplement information posted here is intended for educational and informational purposes only, and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice from a medical doctor. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. If you choose to use AAS it's your responsibility to know the laws of the country that you live in. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website.
-
08-28-2008, 04:28 PM #5Senior Member ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Ma
- Posts
- 1,731
- Rep Points
- 23592
I would go with option 3 or 4 the first 2 would be double methyls noyt the best combo's to run.
-
03-25-2009, 03:05 PM #6Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Pakistan
- Posts
- 20
- Rep Points
- 10
thats exactly what i was thinking. both PHs will be methylated. what wud be the best option to stack with epistane/havoc?
-
03-25-2009, 03:08 PM #7Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Pakistan
- Posts
- 20
- Rep Points
- 10
how abt bold? its mild. but the recommended cycle for bold is 6-8 weeks whereas for epistane its 4 weeks.
my goal is to go for a mass gaining cycle.
-
03-25-2009, 04:07 PM #8Senior Member ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Power Rack
- Posts
- 2,303
- Rep Points
- 1238818
Bold ran at 600mg a day is very effective.
-
03-25-2009, 04:32 PM #9Founder of GOSB SUPER MODERATOR
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Gender
- Location
- Down by the River
- Posts
- 20,175
- Rep Points
- 413505227
IFORCE BOLD.......
iForce Nutrition 1,4 AD Bold 200
Disclaimer: All health, fitness, diet, nutrition, anabolic steroid & supplement information posted here is intended for educational and informational purposes only, and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice from a medical doctor. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. If you choose to use AAS it's your responsibility to know the laws of the country that you live in. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website.
-
03-25-2009, 06:14 PM #10Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Pakistan
- Posts
- 20
- Rep Points
- 10
i weight 170 lb, 5' 11" at around 10% bf. wud it be a good idea to go for 600 mg at my weight?
-
03-25-2009, 06:21 PM #11Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Pakistan
- Posts
- 20
- Rep Points
- 10
so u think stacking epistane n bold wud be a good idea? i was thinking of 6-8 weeks of bold n 4 weeks of epistane. 2-4 weeks to bold alone first n then 4 weeks of bold n epistane together. along with cycle suport.
what abt pct? i was thinking of a serm. nolva at 20 mg for 4 weeks? do u think i should also use clomid for the first 2 weeks? if yes, at what dosage? or nolva alone will get the job done? will there be a need for a test booster along with the serm? for instance, testabolan or post cycle support?
thanks
Similar Threads
-
Any of you mass produce your green tea?
By ArnoldsProtege in forum Diet & NutritionReplies: 1Last Post: 05-29-2008, 07:24 PM -
Mom's Genetics Could Produce Gay Sons
By min0 lee in forum Sexual HealthReplies: 7Last Post: 03-03-2006, 12:19 PM -
Mice bioengineered to produce omega-3
By Vieope in forum SupplementsReplies: 3Last Post: 02-05-2004, 09:36 PM -
Produce Boy
By urso8up in forum Open ChatReplies: 1Last Post: 05-04-2003, 09:54 PM -
Produce.....? Good or Bad
By X-Cop in forum Diet & NutritionReplies: 12Last Post: 06-27-2002, 07:33 PM
Posting Permissions
DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.