Not sure of the long term effects. I doubt anyone is but I can tell you I've been taking CEE in cycles for a few years now and had blood work done recently. I was on the CEE at the time and all my enzyme levels were perfect for what it's worth.
Speaking of overkill, why is it that the bottles almost all say to take one serving before training and another serving after, for a total of 6g? Does regular old monohydrate state to take it before and after? Usually not, so why do they do this with CEE? Is it to use more product and make you buy more, or is there a genuine reason for using it before and after?
I would think one serving of 3g before training should be sufficient, thoughts?
Speaking of overkill, why is it that the bottles almost all say to take one serving before training and another serving after, for a total of 6g? Does regular old monohydrate state to take it before and after? Usually not, so why do they do this with CEE? Is it to use more product and make you buy more, or is there a genuine reason for using it before and after?
I would think one serving of 3g before training should be sufficient, thoughts?
3grams should be, although body weight is a factor as well, keep in mind many males take 10grams of mono daily.
3grams should be, although body weight is a factor as well, keep in mind many males take 10grams of mono daily.
Now, with mono, would 10g produce the same types of problems for your kidneys if you don't drink enough water? Isn't mono somewhat "safer" than the CEE?
Now, with mono, would 10g produce the same types of problems for your kidneys if you don't drink enough water? Isn't mono somewhat "safer" than the CEE?
I'm going to stick to just 3g a day before workouts. I only thought about doing the whole 'before and after' thing as, like Stewart14 mentioned, many supp. companies (in this case, BSN) suggest taking their products before and after training (as much as I'd like to say BSN were referring just to their Cellmass, they may well have suggested NO Explode before, Cell mass after - or vice verser - I can't remember).
As for Mono versus CEE, I always thought CEE was 'safer' and more effective because its ester allowed a higher rate of absorption, and significantly reduced the amount of creatine being converted to creatinine. I always thought that mono worked on the principle that you'd need to ingest, say, 10g of the stuff, simply to get six or so grams of creatine - sacrificing fairly large amounts to go unused and, worse, convert to the detrimental creatinine. I thought with the benefits of CEE above, you could get more/the same amount of active ingredient but at a much lower dose. Similar to how Kre-Akalyn is supposed to work (but obviously not as effective). Plus, with CEE there is the added bonus or not needing the whole 'loading' approach. I have no facts and figures to back any of this up, mind, this is just stuff I've read over the years.
DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.