IronMag Research Chems

25% Off Black Friday Sale

Growth Hormone, Drug Of Choice Or Over-Hyped?

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Prince's Avatar


    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Panama
    Posts
    64,170
    Rep Points
    2147483647

    Growth Hormone, Drug Of Choice Or Over-Hyped?

    Growth Hormone, Drug Of Choice Or Over-Hyped?
    by Will Brink

    If there’s one over hyped misunderstood hormone out there, it’s human growth hormone (HGH). It’s constantly pushed as the mother of all anabolic hormones and mentioned in virtually every supplement add and every news story about athletes of all kind.

    Readers of my ebooks and articles know I can consider it highly overrated in terms of what it can do for building muscle or improving athletic performance. GH has greater effects as a hormone that can improve recoup vs. directly impact performance per se, can have uses healing connective tissue injuries, and when combined with other hormones/drugs, appears to have synergism, although data is lacking there.

    In terms of it’s ability to directly impact athletic performance, an extensive review of the literature recently published entitled “Systematic review: the effects of growth hormone on athletic performance” (1) essentially came to the same conclusions as I have. The authors specifically evaluated evidence about the effects of growth hormone on athletic performance in physically fit, young individuals, so they were not looking at studies in GH deficient populations (e.g., older populations, etc.) which usually find benefits of using this hormone.

    The authors reviewed a pile of studies which met a their inclusion criteria of randomized, controlled trials that “compared growth hormone treatment with no growth hormone treatment in community-dwelling healthy participants between 13 and 45 years of age.”

    What they found after reviewing all these studies, was that on average, “lean body mass increased in growth hormone recipients compared with participants who did not receive growth hormone.” However, that increase in LBM only averaged 2.1 kg, or 4.62lbs. Not exactly impressive gains in LBM, considering what HGH costs or compared to even what a supplement like creatine can achieve!

    More importantly, from all the studies they reviewed “strength and exercise capacity did not seem to improve” and “Growth hormone-treated participants more frequently experienced soft tissue edema and fatigue than did those not treated with growth hormone.”

    It should be noted however that few studies looked directly at HGH effects on athletic performance directly, and the studies may not have reflected “real world” doses, but the above does not bode well for GH in my view, and this review does little to improve my opinion of HGH as a stand alone drug for improving performance in healthy athletes. Bang for the buck, it’s a highly overrated hormone for that use. The authors concluded

    “Claims that growth hormone enhances physical performance are not supported by the scientific literature. Although the limited available evidence suggests that growth hormone increases lean body mass, it may not improve strength; in addition, it may worsen exercise capacity and increase adverse events. More research is needed to conclusively determine the effects of growth hormone on athletic performance.”

    All in all, a fair assessment on their part in my view…

    (1) Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 20;148(10):747-58. Epub 2008 Mar 17.

    source


    IronMagLabs 15% Discount Code: Robert15






    IronMag Research 15% Discount Code: Robert15



  2. #2
    Chemistry Experiment
    ADMINISTRATOR
    heavyiron's Avatar


    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Staying Anabolic
    Posts
    15,212
    Rep Points
    2147483647

    HGH is the worst bang for the buck in my humble opinion.



    IronMagLabs 15% Off Coupon Code = heavyiron15


    IronMag Research Now Open! - heavyiron15 for 15% off!


    All posts are for entertainment and may contain fiction. Consult a medical doctor before using any medications or supplements. Heavyiron does not advocate readers engage in any illegal activity.



  3. #3
    Senior Member
    BOARD REP
    World-Pharma.org's Avatar


    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    europe
    Posts
    9,614
    Rep Points
    595454895

    Great post.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    stronger4ever's Avatar


    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    851
    Rep Points
    55260954

    And you post this after I start my cycle

  5. #5
    Registered User
    stronger4ever's Avatar


    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    851
    Rep Points
    55260954

    Well I think the other effects of the hormone are also beneficial for bodybuilding. The fatloss and the skin benefits definetively help.

  6. #6
    Swollen Member
    ELITE MEMBER
    SloppyJ's Avatar


    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    US
    Posts
    7,232
    Rep Points
    565426092

    I think for older people it might be better. I don't think I'll touch it until i'm over 40. But by that time there will be plenty new things to try.

  7. #7
    big for a notbig


    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    SLUMERICA
    Posts
    2,416
    Rep Points
    293087326

    That's one side of the argument...what about the fact that it can increase the quantity of muscle cells while AAS can only increase the size of existing cells.
    Cumming day and night.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    BOARD REP
    stylus187's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    502
    Rep Points
    67089952

    Quote Originally Posted by heavyiron View Post
    HGH is the worst bang for the buck in my humble opinion.
    Worth the money, if used wisely!! I love Growth!!!

  9. #9
    Chemistry Experiment
    ADMINISTRATOR
    heavyiron's Avatar


    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Staying Anabolic
    Posts
    15,212
    Rep Points
    2147483647

    Quote Originally Posted by Diesel618 View Post
    That's one side of the argument...what about the fact that it can increase the quantity of muscle cells while AAS can only increase the size of existing cells.
    This statement is false. Steroids have been proven to increase the number of satellite cells AND muscle cell size.



    IronMagLabs 15% Off Coupon Code = heavyiron15


    IronMag Research Now Open! - heavyiron15 for 15% off!


    All posts are for entertainment and may contain fiction. Consult a medical doctor before using any medications or supplements. Heavyiron does not advocate readers engage in any illegal activity.



  10. #10
    Registered User


    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    770
    Rep Points
    27975665

    Quote Originally Posted by SloppyJ View Post
    I think for older people it might be better. I don't think I'll touch it until i'm over 40. But by that time there will be plenty new things to try.
    this thought always gets me excited

Similar Threads

  1. Growth Hormone Two (20kDa Growth Hormone)
    By Prince in forum Bodybuilding Gossip
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-29-2011, 05:44 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-29-2011, 02:30 PM
  3. Thyroid Hormone + Growth Hormone
    By Prince in forum Articles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-27-2011, 01:52 PM
  4. Drug of choice?
    By Doola in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 05-19-2005, 10:01 PM
  5. Party drug of choice??
    By GodlyBODY in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-23-2003, 10:42 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
-->