New EPA-approved DuPont herbicide linked to widespread killing of trees

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Prince's Avatar


    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Panama
    Posts
    64,158
    Rep Points
    2147483647

    New EPA-approved DuPont herbicide linked to widespread killing of trees

    New EPA-approved DuPont herbicide linked to widespread killing of trees, authorities unconcerned
    by Jonathan Benson, staff writer

    (NaturalNews) The DuPont chemical company recently received approval from the US Environment Protection Agency (EPA) for its new herbicide Imprelis (aminocyclopyrachlor), which has been alleged as an "environmentally friendly" alternative to other herbicides.

    However, a recent New York Times (NYT) report implicates the herbicide in causing the widespread deaths of thousands of trees across the country, including Norway spruces, eastern white pines, willows, poplars, and conifers.

    DuPont originally designed Imprelis with the stated intent to kill lawn weeds like dandelion and clover -- both of these "weeds" happen to be highly nutritious foods, by the way -- because, frankly, most people want their lawns to be perfectly homogenous in every way. But the chemical, despite being marketed as safe for the environment, is killing off trees as well, which has caused quite an uproar.

    The NYT report indicates that DuPont, various local nurseries and garden supply stores that carry and sell Imprelis, and even authorities, are receiving hordes of complaints from the public that the herbicide is their killing trees en masse.

    And yet DuPont remains in denial that Imprelis is to blame, and has already come out claiming that customers might be at fault for improperly mixing or applying the chemical. And the EPA appears to be taking a similar approach, despite giving very unconvincing lip-service that it is taking the situation "very seriously."

    "We've made 1,000 applications and had 350 complaints of dead trees, and it's climbing," lamented Matt Coats, services manager for Underwood Nursery in Adrian, Mich., to the NYT. "I've done nothing for the last three weeks but deal with angry customers. We're seeing some tree doing OK, with just the tips getting brown, and others are completely dead and it looks like someone took a flamethrower to them."

    Coats went on to say that while his nursery has liability insurance to replace the dead trees, each incident holds a $500 deductible. In other words, his company has already spent $150,000 out of pocket to pay for damages caused by Imprelis, and these costs are escalating. Many landscapers, however, have it far worse, as their insurance policies largely do not cover dead trees, many of which were mature and irreplaceable.

    The EPA deserves much of the blame for approving Imprelis in the first place
    The fact that DuPont markets Imprelis as having "low toxicity to mammals and low environmental impact" -- all while the chemical cocktail is actually causing a real-life, utterly-devastating environmental impact as we speak -- is despicable. And while it is easy to put all the blame on DuPont for selling a product that is mislabeled, at best, it is important not to forget that the EPA is actually responsible as well because the agency approved the herbicide in the first place.

    According to the NYT, the EPA spent 23 months investigating Imprelis prior to granting it approval. It is unclear what type of investigating the agency actually performed during this time, though, as one would think that a basic platform of product testing would include seeing how trees, plants, and other non-target shrubs respond to the herbicide -- which it appears the agency did not do.

    The EPA either never performed any safety testing on Imprelis at all, in which case it has proven itself to be an utterly useless "protector" of the environment, or it performed tests and did not consider the findings to be of much concern. In either case, the EPA has demonstrated that it is unable to properly perform its job duties, and deserves to be stripped of all regulatory authority.

    Since pyralids, the class of herbicides to which Imprelis belongs, have been known to poison non-target plants as far back as 2008, the indictment of the EPA goes even deeper. Pyralids biodegrade so slowly that they can remain in soil for years and leech directly into groundwater supplies. And if the soil is ever composted, the herbicide can spread even further, causing extensive damage.

    Such easily-accessed information must have come up during the EPA's 23-month "investigation" of Imprelis, which suggests that the EPA was willfully complicit in approving a dangerous product that is mislabeled as being safe. And if this is the case, then the EPA must be immediately investigated and held liable for potential criminal activity.

    No synthetic chemical herbicide is truly safe, despite claims made by chemical companies.

    What all of this really comes down to is the fact that no synthetic chemical formula is safe. No matter how creatively the chemical companies try to label their products as "safe" or "low impact," such claims are patently false when the chemicals in question have been synthetically engineered to kill plants.

    The only effective and safe ways to deal with weeds is either to pull them out by hand, or learn to accept them and the many benefits they can actually provide, which include improving soil health and reducing the need for excess watering.

    There are also a variety of companies that produce truly-safe and natural lawn care products that will help with lawn management. To learn more, visit:
    SafeLawns.org - Organic Lawn Care for a Healthier Planet


    IronMagLabs 15% Discount Code: Robert15






    IronMag Research 15% Discount Code: Robert15



  2. #2
    Registered User
    BigPapaPump68's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,491
    Rep Points
    2096464

    Poor guy, 150,000 out of pocket can put you out of business very fast. Of course DuPont won't man up to it being their product, but I find it interesting that suchna company wouldn't have tested it thousands of times before putting it out to the public

  3. #3
    Is Doin It 4 Da Shorteez
    LAM's Avatar


    Join Date
    May 2002
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Las Vegas & Florida & St. Croix
    Posts
    16,381
    Rep Points
    980708041

    Dupont has been sticking it to us for a long time. people still don't realize teflon (PTFE) contains carcinogens.

    say no to non-stick cookware use stainless only!
    William F. Buckley describes a conservative as, "someone who stands athwart history, yelling Stop." - and then proceeds to drag civilization back to times best left in history's dungheap.

  4. #4
    Sancho
    Big Pimpin's Avatar


    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    I ain't gonna work on Maggie's farm no more
    Posts
    5,587
    Rep Points
    1244396447

    Something else DuPont has done for the last 10 years is buy every Ti02 manufacturer it can get it hands on in order to drive up the prices. Anything white in color from paint to t-shirts has Ti02 in it. Over the last 5 or so years, the Chinese have flooded the US market with their TI02 and driven the prices down some, but better manufactures try not to buy Chinese raw materials such as pigments.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Prince's Avatar


    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Panama
    Posts
    64,158
    Rep Points
    2147483647

    wasn't Dupont one of the main reason for the hammer coming down on MJ, mainly due to hemp being a big competitor to their man made shit products?


    IronMagLabs 15% Discount Code: Robert15






    IronMag Research 15% Discount Code: Robert15



  6. #6
    Is Doin It 4 Da Shorteez
    LAM's Avatar


    Join Date
    May 2002
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Las Vegas & Florida & St. Croix
    Posts
    16,381
    Rep Points
    980708041

    yep...hemp was going to give dupont's new nylon fibers a run for their money so they got legislation passed that made the taxes on growing it so high it no longer became economically feasible.
    William F. Buckley describes a conservative as, "someone who stands athwart history, yelling Stop." - and then proceeds to drag civilization back to times best left in history's dungheap.

Similar Threads

  1. When you blaze your trees....
    By SFW in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-22-2011, 06:15 PM
  2. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-06-2011, 05:05 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-21-2009, 05:49 PM
  4. Onions & Trees
    By Tough Old Man in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-03-2006, 08:30 AM
  5. Why Christmas Trees Are Better Than Men
    By david in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-23-2004, 03:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
-->