Over the last four months I have spent considerable time reading the literature in regards to rhGH serum testing. I have now had 6 serum tests to verify Uncle Z's GH and to determine my own baseline response to US pharmacy HGH. It is absolutely clear from my own testing that the February and March batches of Uncle Z GH are genuine and contain high amounts of GH. I honestly had my doubts but continued testing anyway. After the latest results I received today I no longer question the growth hormone from Uncle Z.
During this journey I have learned a ton about GH serum testing. I learned I'm a low responder to GH. Because of my low response I kept thinking the February and March GH was under dosed but now I know that to be false. I purchased US pharmacy GH from my doctor on Monday and tested this known properly dosed GH on myself. The results today put my serum levels at exactly 19.7 ng/mL. This is close to the February Uncle Z GH results of 17.9. I have been pursuing this because of a bad batch that came out in December that resulted in a recall. The December batch was in fact bad however since the recall the Uncle Z GH has been very high quality.
I publicly apologize to Uncle Z and Ordawg1 for not believing them. They told me the GH from February and March was correct but since my labs came back lower than normal I assumed the GH to be under dosed. Other members had higher values than me and my US pharmacy results were lower than normal so I know for a fact that I'm a low responder to rhGH. I'm sorry for not believing them and at the same time very happy that our community has high quality GH available at a fair price.
Please forgive me for my error.
Thanks
~heavy
During this journey I have learned a ton about GH serum testing. I learned I'm a low responder to GH. Because of my low response I kept thinking the February and March GH was under dosed but now I know that to be false. I purchased US pharmacy GH from my doctor on Monday and tested this known properly dosed GH on myself. The results today put my serum levels at exactly 19.7 ng/mL. This is close to the February Uncle Z GH results of 17.9. I have been pursuing this because of a bad batch that came out in December that resulted in a recall. The December batch was in fact bad however since the recall the Uncle Z GH has been very high quality.
I publicly apologize to Uncle Z and Ordawg1 for not believing them. They told me the GH from February and March was correct but since my labs came back lower than normal I assumed the GH to be under dosed. Other members had higher values than me and my US pharmacy results were lower than normal so I know for a fact that I'm a low responder to rhGH. I'm sorry for not believing them and at the same time very happy that our community has high quality GH available at a fair price.
Please forgive me for my error.
Thanks
~heavy