Cemproducts.com

          Follow Us on Facebook        Subscribe to us on YouTube        Follow Us on Twitter        IronMagLabs on Instagram        Sign Up for our Newsletter


Long Ester vs. Short Ester while cutting

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Registered User


    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    32
    Rep Points
    1864750

    Long Ester vs. Short Ester while cutting






    I'm sure this has been touched on many times, but it's hard to find clear-cut scientific responses without a bunch of bull&$*# speculation. To simplify the question, let's leave test out of it. Tren and Mast are both known to reduce fat, water, estrogen, etc., so what is the difference if one person uses a long, enanthate ester, and another uses a shorter prop/acetate ester? If the compounds are both dry and used at the same time, why would enanthate, prop, acetate, etc even matter?

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Standard Donkey's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    6,147
    Rep Points
    528521149

    Quote Originally Posted by bigiron View Post
    I'm sure this has been touched on many times, but it's hard to find clear-cut scientific responses without a bunch of bull&$*# speculation. To simplify the question, let's leave test out of it. Tren and Mast are both known to reduce fat, water, estrogen, etc., so what is the difference if one person uses a long, enanthate ester, and another uses a shorter prop/acetate ester? If the compounds are both dry and used at the same time, why would enanthate, prop, acetate, etc even matter?
    different dispersion rates and different amount of compound per 100mg..

    shorter esters = faster plus more compound per 100mg

  3. #3
    Registered User


    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    32
    Rep Points
    1864750

    So the dispersion rate is faster for shorter esters and slower for longer esters, that I understand and am okay with. But all other things constant (dry compound, fat burning ability, anti-estrogen ability, etc.) why does the dispersion rate even matter from your cutting/condition standpoint as long as you start a week or so earlier than the faster acting versions??

  4. #4
    DRSE owns this shithole
    SUPER MODERATOR
    theCaptn''s Avatar


    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    the 7 seas
    Posts
    19,624
    Rep Points
    2147483647

    Short esters are easier to dial in. That's about it.
    TheCaptn' is not a registered proctologist. His post are for his amusement only. Please seek proper medical advice if symptoms persist.


  5. #5
    Registered User


    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    17
    Rep Points
    69075

    I go shorter for cutting cycles.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    lee111s's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    England
    Posts
    303
    Rep Points
    5890416






    It shouldn't make much difference. I've recomped on test E and ended with mast E.

Similar Threads

  1. Testosterone Undecanoate - Long or Short Ester
    By MidWest in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-22-2012, 01:13 AM
  2. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-06-2011, 07:37 PM
  3. Short ester vs long ester
    By GH Consigliere in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 03-09-2011, 03:55 PM
  4. Long Esters followed by Short ester Cycle
    By theHammer in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-17-2008, 06:25 AM
  5. short ester cycle
    By BigPapaPump68 in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-29-2006, 10:56 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
DISABLED END -->