Cemproducts.com

          Follow Us on Facebook        Subscribe to us on YouTube        Follow Us on Twitter        IronMagLabs on Instagram        Sign Up for our Newsletter


Super DMZ original version(w/superdrol) vs super DMZ 2.0

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Registered User
    wheybolic63's Avatar


    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    92
    Rep Points
    319400

    Super DMZ original version(w/superdrol) vs super DMZ 2.0






    For those of you who have tried both can you compare the two in terms of weight gain, strength, vascularity, density and fullness, sides, overall musculature, etc.. thanks guys

  2. #2
    Moderator
    MODERATOR


    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Ihio
    Posts
    862
    Rep Points
    164159837

    They both contain Dimeth, so you will notice some similar effects. However, SD and M-sten and 2 completely different drugs. SD results in more muscle fullness (likely due to greater inhbition of the 11-beta hydroxylase enzyme) and a drier appearance. M-sten doesn't cause water retention, but doesn't reduce sub-q water, either. It is neutral in this regard. Because of the greater increase in fullness experienced with SD, you will likley notice more size gains, but this can be deceptive, as I.M. water retention is not real muscle tissue. Still, ona mg to mg bais, I give SD the nod for size gains. In terms of strength enhancement, they both seem very similar to me. One advantage of M-sten is it is less likely to cause side effects...less chance of lethary, appetite suppression, depression, etc. In addition, SD is probably more liver toxic, mg for mg. In my opinion, M-sten should be dosed a little higher than SD for best results....between 30-40 mg per day...while SD is normally dosed at 20-30 mg per day. When dosed at 40 mg per day, M-sten provides very impressive size gains (on par with about 25-30 mg of SD) and for some people, may even be better for strength gains. Which do I like better? I am not really sure yet, but I will say M-sten is more pleasant to use. Still, keep in mind that you will require more than 20 mg if you want to experience its maximum effects.
    Last edited by Mike Arnold; 01-04-2013 at 12:34 AM.
    IronMagLabs 15% Discount Code: Mike15



    BlackstoneLabs 10% Discount Code: Mike10


  3. #3
    Aesthetic god


    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    2,955
    Rep Points
    388930239

    ^^^^^couldnt of said it better myself

  4. #4
    Performance Enhanced
    ELITE MEMBER
    The Prototype's Avatar


    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Noneya
    Posts
    1,820
    Rep Points
    124468183

    Super DMZ original version(w/superdrol) vs super DMZ 2.0






    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Arnold View Post
    They both contain Dimeth, so you will notice some similar effects. However, SD and M-sten and 2 completely different drugs. SD results in more muscle fullness (likely due to greater inhbition of the 11-beta hydroxylase enzyme) and a drier appearance. M-sten doesn't cause water retention, but doesn't reduce sub-q water, either. It is neutral in this regard. Because of the greater increase in fullness experienced with SD, you will likley notice more size gains, but this can be deceptive, as I.M. water retention is not real muscle tissue. Still, ona mg to mg bais, I give SD the nod for size gains. In terms of strength enhancement, they both seem very similar to me. One advantage of M-sten is it is less likely to cause side effects...less chance of lethary, appetite suppression, depression, etc. In addition, SD is probably more liver toxic, mg for mg. In my opinion, M-sten should be dosed a little higher than SD for best results....between 30-40 mg per day...while SD is normally dosed at 20-30 mg per day. When dosed at 40 mg per day, M-sten provides very impressive size gains (on par with about 25-30 mg of SD) and for some people, may even be better for strength gains. Which do I like better? I am not really sure yet, but I will say M-sten is more pleasant to use. Still, keep in mind that you will require more than 20 mg if you want to experience its maximum effects.
    Smart man. I would rep you but I'm on tapatalk and I'm not sure if I can.
    FKA Rippedgolfer

Similar Threads

  1. Super DMZ (Original Version)
    By wheybolic63 in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-03-2012, 08:35 PM
  2. Super-DMZ Rx (old version) in stock
    By Prince in forum Supplements
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-14-2012, 08:14 PM
  3. Super-DMZ Rx (old version) in stock
    By Prince in forum IronMagLabs
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-13-2012, 05:24 PM
  4. Original Super DMZ vs. Reformulated Super DMZ
    By B Lucky in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-26-2012, 05:23 PM
  5. Super-DMZ rx~Dimethazine (old version)
    By heavyiron in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 06-30-2011, 11:38 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
DISABLED END -->