Cemproducts.com

          Follow Us on Facebook        Subscribe to us on YouTube        Follow Us on Twitter        IronMagLabs on Instagram        Sign Up for our Newsletter


What's harder on your body, tren or deca? Also I never get any gains from eq.....

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Registered User
    swoleosis's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    80
    Rep Points
    8698555

    Cool What's harder on your body, tren or deca? Also I never get any gains from eq.....






    I took deca 600mg/wk and I get way better gains/results from half the amount of tren keeping test at 750. I've taken it from two different brands and both times I really didn't see much. I also wanna include I ran it for ten weeks. I also took eq twice the same time as the deca at 600mgs/wk and got none of the positive effects one should get. No increased vascularity or appetite or profound strength gains that I wouldn't have gotten from just test. I also ran the eq for 10 weeks. All I ever really take is tren and test and i keep gaining and having awesome results, I'm just wondering if I'm missing out on anything by only really running these two compounds when I could run npp with test and see something I haven't in the past. Also which one do you guys think is harsher.

  2. #2
    Newbie


    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1
    Rep Points
    10

    deca is got more side effects bro but you hold on to more gains with tren. As far as mgs go 600 mgs a week is good for tren but with deca you should run more like 900. This is from personal experiance thow, not from some kid who heard it from one of thows no it alls in that click with SF who heard it from somebody else in the click who just reads and spends too much time online

  3. #3
    Registered User
    24K's Avatar


    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Neon Lights
    Posts
    348
    Rep Points
    5096329

    Quote Originally Posted by swoleosis View Post
    I took deca 600mg/wk and I get way better gains/results from half the amount of tren keeping test at 750. I've taken it from two different brands and both times I really didn't see much. I also wanna include I ran it for ten weeks. I also took eq twice the same time as the deca at 600mgs/wk and got none of the positive effects one should get. No increased vascularity or appetite or profound strength gains that I wouldn't have gotten from just test. I also ran the eq for 10 weeks. All I ever really take is tren and test and i keep gaining and having awesome results, I'm just wondering if I'm missing out on anything by only really running these two compounds when I could run npp with test and see something I haven't in the past. Also which one do you guys think is harsher.
    Eq is the most underrated steroid there is... Your problem here is that you didn't run it long enough... Eq doesn't even begin to start peaking until week 9 and should be ran 16 weeks AT THE MINIMUM... Your not going to notice much before that... You should also be running it 600-800 mg week... 800 is definitely the sweet spot... It was just starting to get going at the 10 week mark for you bro...

  4. #4
    Registered User
    swoleosis's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    80
    Rep Points
    8698555

    Quote Originally Posted by David Pittman View Post
    deca is got more side effects bro but you hold on to more gains with tren. As far as mgs go 600 mgs a week is good for tren but with deca you should run more like 900. This is from personal experiance thow, not from some kid who heard it from one of thows no it alls in that click with SF who heard it from somebody else in the click who just reads and spends too much time online
    Lol I know what you mean. I only take from experience or don't say anything. I hate 140 pounds kids regurgitating info that they read on a steroid profile written 20 years ago. Thanks for taking the time to respond.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    swoleosis's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    80
    Rep Points
    8698555

    Hen
    Quote Originally Posted by 24K View Post
    Eq is the most underrated steroid there is... Your problem here is that you didn't run it long enough... Eq doesn't even begin to start peaking until week 9 and should be ran 16 weeks AT THE MINIMUM... Your not going to notice much before that... You should also be running it 600-800 mg week... 800 is definitely the sweet spot... It was just starting to get going at the 10 week mark for you bro...
    Where I'm at now in my current bodybuilding efforts I like to get at LEAST ten weeks of activity whether it be long ester or short. It takes 9-10 weeks to kick in? Holy shit. So id have to run it for at least 20 weeks. It doesn't make sense to me to take something for 16 Weeks and only six of those weeks will I be receiving and positive effects from the eq. You don't feel the same way? So at 800 mgs a week when's its active in my blood stream from YOUR experience what kinda of results will I be experiencing( and yes my bulking diet and training is spot on).

  6. #6
    Registered User


    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    47
    Rep Points
    256032

    Not a fan of deca myself. Like you said, half the amount of tren will give you twice the results. I like running a trt dose of test and ramping up tren throughout the cycle. That stuff transforms you!

    EQ is a great addition to any cycle and 24k is spot on... 16-20 weeks at 600-800mg is ideal for great results.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    oufinny's Avatar


    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    3,178
    Rep Points
    429666746

    Quote Originally Posted by 24K View Post
    Eq is the most underrated steroid there is... Your problem here is that you didn't run it long enough... Eq doesn't even begin to start peaking until week 9 and should be ran 16 weeks AT THE MINIMUM... Your not going to notice much before that... You should also be running it 600-800 mg week... 800 is definitely the sweet spot... It was just starting to get going at the 10 week mark for you bro...
    I ran EQ at 900mg for 16 weeks, it is so freaking overrated and this was the good stuff from the sexy AY (god rest her sole). What a waste of money, buy masteron E or run more test, you get so much more. The only benefit of EQ is you can pin it once a week as its such a long ester. In regards to Deca, I preferred NPP to it hands down, drier, works faster, less 19-nor sides, winner winner chicken dinner. I never ran tren though it WAS my last planned cycle until I had to take a very extended hiatus that I am on now.
    AY Fan Club President.

    "Damn, sometimes I think you guys make being stupid seem like a skill set." - Troubador

  8. #8
    Registered User
    meathead96's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Unites States
    Posts
    54
    Rep Points
    265610

    My body loves tren lol, hates deca.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    BOARD REP
    exerciseordie's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    steroidsfax.com
    Posts
    657
    Rep Points
    32138845

    I'd say run EQ on a 20-24 week Lean bulking cycle. Its not going to give crazy results but it will aid the other compounds.

    www.steroidsfax.com

    EvolutionPeptides.com Discount Code: EOD15 15% Off

  10. #10
    Registered User
    oufinny's Avatar


    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    3,178
    Rep Points
    429666746

    Quote Originally Posted by exerciseordie View Post
    I'd say run EQ on a 20-24 week Lean bulking cycle. Its not going to give crazy results but it will aid the other compounds.
    By doing what? It's not going to lower SHBG and it raises red blood cell levels and hematocrit to dangerous levels... Pointless as far as I see it.
    AY Fan Club President.

    "Damn, sometimes I think you guys make being stupid seem like a skill set." - Troubador

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    BOARD REP
    exerciseordie's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    steroidsfax.com
    Posts
    657
    Rep Points
    32138845

    Quote Originally Posted by oufinny View Post
    By doing what? It's not going to lower SHBG and it raises red blood cell levels and hematocrit to dangerous levels... Pointless as far as I see it.
    Oh I never suggest running it, I was just saying that's how I would run it if I were going to use it. It will help build muscle, but I'd agree to look into other compounds that are more effective.

    www.steroidsfax.com

    EvolutionPeptides.com Discount Code: EOD15 15% Off

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Jimmyinkedup's Avatar


    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    US
    Posts
    831
    Rep Points
    52119049

    Tren is harder by far.
    Eq= spend twice as much, do twice as much, do twice as long...and get half the results you would with half the amount of test. Underrated? Its garbage.








  13. #13
    Registered User
    24K's Avatar


    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Neon Lights
    Posts
    348
    Rep Points
    5096329

    Quote Originally Posted by swoleosis View Post
    Hen
    Where I'm at now in my current bodybuilding efforts I like to get at LEAST ten weeks of activity whether it be long ester or short. It takes 9-10 weeks to kick in? Holy shit. So id have to run it for at least 20 weeks. It doesn't make sense to me to take something for 16 Weeks and only six of those weeks will I be receiving and positive effects from the eq. You don't feel the same way? So at 800 mgs a week when's its active in my blood stream from YOUR experience what kinda of results will I be experiencing( and yes my bulking diet and training is spot on).
    If you ask around about eq, every other person loves it and every other person hates it... It seems to have a lot of people that just don't respond to it... I happen to be one that really responds well to it... I know a lot of guys that absolutely love it and a lot that absolutely hate it... If you find your a non responder, then its obviously not for you... I get huge increases in endurance, vascularity and strength from it and nice lean muscle gains... I always run it 20 weeks... You just need to make sure to donate blood to keep your rbc count where it needs to be...

  14. #14
    Getting strong
    ELITE MEMBER
    g0hardorgohome's Avatar


    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Under your skin
    Posts
    238
    Rep Points
    6492856






    I don't really see mass gains from EQ, only veins, hunger and increased endurance during workouts. Not gonna use it for bulking purposes again (except if I get it for really good price) but if I somehow am forced to do cardio during my cycles, EQ would help with that.

Similar Threads

  1. More lean gains on Deca or EQ?
    By dawun in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-28-2012, 06:47 PM
  2. Deca Gains
    By ItsMrGreen in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-17-2011, 08:19 PM
  3. tren or deca...which one is harder to recover from?
    By alphabolic in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 09-01-2011, 07:16 AM
  4. How does tren shut you down harder?
    By minimal in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-14-2011, 01:23 PM
  5. Gains Getting Harder
    By SnowManSnow in forum Training
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 09-17-2008, 06:40 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
DISABLED END -->