Are Single-Joint Exercises Worthless?

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Purple One
    ADMINISTRATOR
    The Admin's Avatar


    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    74,653

    Thanks Thanks Given 
    475
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,212
    Thanked in
    968 Posts
    Rep Points
    2147483647

    Question Are Single-Joint Exercises Worthless?

    Are Single-Joint Exercises Worthless?

    A new study involving both naturals and druggies sheds some light on this common question.

    The Dawn of 30-Minute Workouts?
    When I first started lifting weights, I lifted for two hours a day, six days a week, because that's what Joe Weider told me to do. Those weren't his direct instructions, but that's what was implied by the workouts of the professional bodybuilders featured in his flagship magazine, Muscle & Fitness.

    The trouble was, neither me nor any of the other poor newbies that followed that training template knew that all those freaks were on steroids. It just wasn't talked about... ever. As such, we didn't know that the drugs allowed them to get away with training so much and that we should have been following an entirely different set of rules.

    My two-hour workouts probably slowed my progress more than enhanced it, but worse than that was all the stuff I missed out on from being in the gym all the damn time. Missed parties! Missed weddings! Even missed funerals (sorry Ma, sorry Pa, sorry Aunt Trudy, sorry Duke)!

    I had so little spare time that the only woman whose touch I knew all those years was the female powerlifter whose calloused hand would sometimes brush against mine when she spotted me.

    For all that, I've often wished I'd put an axe in Joe Weider's chest. Man, I'd do it now if I knew where he was buried and was willing to put up with all the flak from the woke people who'd be offended by my belated act of vengeance.

    Anyhow, as I grew more knowledgeable, my workout periods shrank by at least half and I made a lot more progress. Thank you, exercise science.

    But what's this? A new study says I could probably halve my gym time AGAIN. It actually says that if I do multi-joint exercises, then all my single-joint exercises (biceps curls, triceps extensions, etc.) are a waste of time. That means no direct biceps work and no direct triceps work, among other things, and the findings even apply to steroid users, too.

    Could this be the dawn of 30-minute workouts?

    What They Did
    Brazilian scientists rounded up 30 male bodybuilders, each of whom had been training for at least three years. They split them up into four groups.

    The first group trained the primary muscle groups with nothing but standard multi-joint exercises for 8 weeks. The second group did the same multi-joint exercises for 8 weeks but added a few single-joint exercises to the mix.

    Now here's where it got interesting. The third group mirrored the exercise protocols of the first group (nothing but multi-joint exercises) and the fourth group mirrored the workouts of the second (multi-joint exercises and single-joint exercises), but these two groups combined training with weekly injections of 600 mg. of a testosterone ester and 200 mg. of stanozolol.

    The workouts programs were fairly sophisticated. Each lifter worked out 6 days a week and they were required to vary rep ranges and rest intervals from week to week. A typical Monday/Thursday workout consisted of the following:
    • A. Barbell Bench Press
    • B. Incline Barbell Bench Press
    • C. Military Press
    • D. Pulley Elbow Extensions


    Since elbow extensions are a single-joint exercise, they were excluded from the workouts of both the natural and the steroid-assisted multi-joint exercise groups.

    Each lifter was also required to take in 2.5 to 3 grams of protein per kilogram of bodyweight.

    What They Found
    Adding single-joint movements to their workouts was pretty much a waste of time in both the "natural" group and, surprisingly, the steroid group.

    Those who did biceps curls made virtually the same amount of progress in both strength and size as the lifters who stuck to multi-joint movements. Those who did triceps extensions didn't get any stronger – in their triceps or in their bench – than the lifters who didn't do them.

    The steroid users, of course, made far greater gains overall than the natural lifters. The researchers wrote the following in their conclusion:

    "The addition of single-joint exercises to a resistance training program that already contains multi-joint exercises brings no additional benefit in terms of muscle performance and anthropometric changes in trained men, whether they are using anabolic steroids or not.

    "These results might help to design more time-efficient resistance training programs, since it suggests that trained men can save time not including single-joint exercises in their routines and still achieve optimal results."

    What to Make of This Info
    I gotta tell you, the results of this study are a little disconcerting. Do we accept the results of this one study and stop doing direct work for biceps and triceps? Do we kick leg extensions to the training gutter? How about leg curls?

    At the very least, the study's results probably still don't apply to the pro bodybuilders that mucked up my early training days or their current counterparts. Unlike the steroid users in this study who used less than a gram of steroids a week, modern pros often use upwards of 3 grams a week.

    They're so roided up that they almost undoubtedly still benefit from any and all additional exercise, be it from multi-joint exercises, single-joint exercises, or swatting flies.

    But what about the rest of us? There's a big part of me that suspects the findings are at least partly correct. After all, there are plenty of powerlifters, Olympic lifters, and even gymnasts who have enviable arms and most of them don't even know how to do a curl or extension.

    I also suspect that one major exception to the scientist's conclusions concerns the hamstrings. They're a dual function muscle group and it's unlikely you could get them to grow to any noticeable degree without at least doing some sort of leg curls, which are a single-joint movement (when done correctly, at least).

    The scientists who put the training program together must have agreed because, while they only had the single-joint training groups doing leg extensions, all groups were required to do "knee flexion" (leg curl-type) exercises.

    I guess there's only one way to find out if the results of this study pertain to you: Punt your single-joint work (at least for arms) for a couple of months and see what happens. If you want to work triceps or biceps, work them with multi-joint movements like close-grip bench presses or weighted chin-ups.


    Source:
    Matheus Barbalho, Victor Coswig, Rodolfo Raiol, James Fisher, James Steele, Ahtonio Bianco, "Single joint exercises do not provide benefits in performance and anthropometric changes in recreational bodybuilders," European Journal of Sport Science, 09 May 2019.

  2. #2
    Super Moderator
    SUPER MODERATOR
    REHH's Avatar


    Join Date
    May 2015
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    579

    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    140
    Thanked in
    122 Posts
    Rep Points
    10321155

    No I think you still need to do single joint exercises

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-16-2019, 04:04 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-12-2019, 05:46 PM
  3. Replies: 263
    Last Post: 03-04-2012, 09:19 PM
  4. Joint Pain, Joint Treatment, Joint Health
    By The Admin in forum Training
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-16-2010, 10:34 AM
  5. Multiple Joint Exercises
    By Incognegro in forum Training
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 11-18-2005, 08:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Copyright© 2001-2019 IronMag® Bodybuilding Discussion Forums