Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
jack52 said:They can beat Pats.
m_jenkins said:Big Ben is the real deal. I think if you put him on another team he would fair well. Since Pittsburgh likes to run the ball down opposing team's throats, he will be fine.
m_jenkins said:All he cares about is winning, not stats. Same thing goes for Brady.
m_jenkins said:And how about ol' Eli Manning? The next great hype! HAHA! Whatever. Serve's him right for not going to San Diego.
m_jenkins said:Ben will win rookie of the year, go the pro bowl, finally win that "ONE FOR THE THUMB" for Pittsburgh and will still not be considered for MVP. Why? Because of Manning throwing TD's. Big Deal. Look at the record's of the team. Ben and Brees are my top canidates for MVP. What QB takes his team from an 6-10 season to 11-1 (10-0 as a starter) has to be considered for MVP....hands down...
jack52 said:I was referring to their regular season game coming up. But as for the playoffs, time will tell. You could be right.(Didn't expect that, did you?) Home field can mean a lot.
Dale Mabry said:I would say Vick deserves it over McNabb, and prolly Terrel Owens over McNabb. Without Terrel, McNabb has the same season he had last year. Unfortunately a receiver will not get the MVP unless he does something unreal.
Neither one of those teams will beat the Pats in the playoffs.
Damn, I thought I had you.I hate to break it to you min0, but the Pats won the Super Bowl in 2005, and thus I was correct.
I was under the impression it was to their team. What were the eagles last year? Add Terrel and a cornerbacks double teaming him and you have Donovan completing more passes. Take him out and Donovan goes 10-6 again. Any quarterback would improve with Terrel.
The obvious choice is Manning no matter how you put it, league-wise or team-wise, but Donovan would not be runner up, the Falcons are one-dimensional and would be 0-16 without him.