IronMagLabs


are new formula's better?

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Pic is at 263-14% jan 06
    NEW_IN_THE_GAME's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sioux Falls South Dakota
    Posts
    1,138
    Rep Points
    -42982

    Question are new formula's better?

    I have never tried alot of creatine esters, or the new arginine esters, are these any better than regular aakg or creatine?. also has anyone tried cex or cee, and if so what were your results. i have only tried a few creatine brands, like cell tech(sucks ass), v12 by sann, which is ok, a little bsn, and some off brand pure monohydrate.
    These are my dreams, which I must make reality!

  2. #2
    Registered User


    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    554
    Rep Points
    126167

    Pure creatine monohydrate is the way to go i reckon. The other products they just make up some rubbish add some extra trash that has no scientific proof of doing anything whatsoever and up the price considerably. Thats just my opinion though. Im no doctor though. Anyway mate goodluck.

  3. #3
    Pic is at 263-14% jan 06
    NEW_IN_THE_GAME's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sioux Falls South Dakota
    Posts
    1,138
    Rep Points
    -42982

    thanks, i will stick with my mono, and my aakg
    These are my dreams, which I must make reality!

  4. #4
    Registered User


    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    18
    Rep Points
    10

    "goal by age 24, weigh 300 or more with less than 10 percent. is it possible, we will see."

    sooo farrrrr...

  5. #5
    Registered User


    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    18
    Rep Points
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by che
    "goal by age 24, weigh 300 or more with less than 10 percent. is it possible, we will see."

    sooo farrrrr...
    i think u can do that in 4 or 5 months...u dont need 6 years..

  6. #6
    Registered User


    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    774
    Rep Points
    692544

    you just responded to something you just wrote
    why do i find that so interesting
    i dont know

  7. #7
    Intensity!
    Steele20's Avatar


    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    711
    Rep Points
    5671917

    Quote Originally Posted by Hlanderr
    you just responded to something you just wrote
    why do i find that so interesting
    i dont know
    lol

  8. #8
    Yuppie
    KentDog's Avatar


    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,053
    Rep Points
    14296577

    Quote Originally Posted by che
    i think u can do that in 4 or 5 months...u dont need 6 years..
    He would have to gain over 30 pounds of pure muscle and still drop body fat to make that goal. 4 or 5 months on roids maybe.

  9. #9
    Forever
    ELITE MEMBER
    dougnukem's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    1,798
    Rep Points
    4396688

    Quote Originally Posted by NEW_IN_THE_GAME
    I have never tried alot of creatine esters, or the new arginine esters, are these any better than regular aakg or creatine?. also has anyone tried cex or cee, and if so what were your results. i have only tried a few creatine brands, like cell tech(sucks ass), v12 by sann, which is ok, a little bsn, and some off brand pure monohydrate.
    I use BN's CEE and have had good luck with it. It's cheap, mixes easily with stuff, and helps with the water rentention issues that mono has. Just my 2 cents.
    From the Ashes....

Similar Threads

  1. Protein Formula's
    By cg89 in forum Supplements
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-30-2011, 10:28 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
-->