What Wladimir Klitschko Proved Against Chris Byrd

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Registered User


    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    12,542
    Rep Points
    15370977

    What Wladimir Klitschko Proved Against Chris Byrd

    What Wladimir Klitschko Proved Against Chris Byrd
    26.04.06 - By Dino Alvarado: Wladimir Klitschko (46-3, 41 KO's) slaughtered Chris Byrd (39-3, 20 KO's) via 7th-round knockout last Saturday. The performance was nothing short of outstanding; Klitschko imposed his size and overwhelmed Byrd the entire fight with a stinging jab and powerful right hand. It seems that trainer Emanuel Steward may be on the verge of finding Wladimir's true potential.

    Now, with that said, to declare Klitschko "officially back" is overreacting, plain and simple. Let's face it; Byrd didn't have the strength to give Klitschko a hard time six years ago the first time these two met, so why would the result of the rematch be any different? That brings me to the original question: What did Wladimir prove against Chris Byrd? Well, he proved what we already knew; if you put a small and weak fighter in front of him, Klitschko will dominate. He knew he could do whatever he wanted because no matter what mistakes he made, he was never going to pay for it.This is not to say Byrd is a terrible boxer; it's just a bad match-up for him, and he provided the ideal opponent for Klitschko.

    He'll be declared the best heavyweight by default, but there should still be some doubt. For example, what would happen in a rematch against Lamon Brewster? First of all, let's put Brewster's most recent bout (in which he lost to Serguei Lyakhovich by unanimous decision) into perspective; he was overweight, and you'd be a fool to say you didn't notice. His focus was not
    there, and the surprisingly skilled Lyakhovich took advantage. In a likely rematch between Lamon and Serguei, the money should be put on Brewster because he won't fall asleep against the same guy twice. Once that obstacle is passed, Lamon and Klitschko should have a rematch. If the first fight, Wladimir was having his way until he inexplicably ran out of gas and
    eventually lost by 5th-round TKO. In that battle, both of Wladimir's main flaws came into play: his chin and stamina (or lack thereof). If he truly is the best heavyweight, Klitschko will find a way to win the fight.

    Being as tall as he is (6'6), it's likely that Klitschko isn't comfortable with fighting people bigger than him, but what happens when a 7-foot giant like Nikolay Valuev is put in front of him? Granted, Valuev hasn't yet proven he's a legit contender, but his size alone would give anyone problems. Klitschko tends to use his jab and keep the smaller opponent at a
    distance, but when he's fighting a taller opponent, what does he do then?

    Let's not forget perhaps the biggest threat in the division, Hasim Rahman. We're all in agreement that Lennox Lewis was the last dominant heavyweight, and ironically, he shared a lot with Wladimir....even his weaknesses. Lewis was constantly criticized for having a glass jaw, and Rahman put that into play five years ago when he knocked Lewis out in the 5th round. Well, Klitschko is known for having a weak chin, too. With that in mind, fighting someone with 33 knockouts like Hasim "The Rock" Rahman should not be too high on his priority list.

    In general, there's nothing wrong with Wladimir Klitschko dominating a world-class fighter like Chris Byrd the way he did, but it shouldn't lead you to believe he's answered all his critics and fixed all his problems. There's still a long way to go before he can be comfortably named the #1 heavyweight in the world.
    I highly recommend all IronMagLabs supplements!
    www.ironmaglabs.com

  2. #2
    Señor Member
    ELITE MEMBER
    MCx2's Avatar


    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    7,870
    Rep Points
    37022201

    I'm glad to see he was back in good form but obviously after the Sanders fight we have to doubt his chin. Only thing is, who is gonna challenge it? The most talented fighters in the division are all Byrd's size which according to the article, plays right into Klitchko's hands (which I happen to agree with). This is a sad sad time for the Heavyweight divison, almost makes me wanna take up boxing.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    bio-chem's Avatar


    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    9,204
    Rep Points
    349837105

    it proved nothing more than he can defeat a guy who he was supposed to deafeat. right now professional heavyweight boxing is like amatuer hou. its sad really. the amount of money thrown around for guys who in other eras wouldnt deserve a title fight yet hold belts now.

  4. #4
    Registered User


    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    12,542
    Rep Points
    15370977

    Quote Originally Posted by bio-chem
    it proved nothing more than he can defeat a guy who he was supposed to deafeat. right now professional heavyweight boxing is like amatuer hou. its sad really. the amount of money thrown around for guys who in other eras wouldnt deserve a title fight yet hold belts now.
    Well you have to realize Ali was getting paid more for a fight in 1974 then these Heavy Weights are today so the pay scale is down by 75% or more. Plus the 130-168lb classes are as good as ever right now.
    I highly recommend all IronMagLabs supplements!
    www.ironmaglabs.com

  5. #5
    primeau
    lnvanry's Avatar


    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Tucson
    Posts
    4,276
    Rep Points
    54346477

    wasn't he the guy the nailed Riddick Bowe in the nuts 3 times?

    sorry i'm not a boxing guru

  6. #6
    Registered User


    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    12,542
    Rep Points
    15370977

    Quote Originally Posted by lnvanry
    wasn't he the guy the nailed Riddick Bowe in the nuts 3 times?

    sorry i'm not a boxing guru
    No that was Andrew Golota






    I highly recommend all IronMagLabs supplements!
    www.ironmaglabs.com

  7. #7
    War Eagle
    ELITE MEMBER
    section8's Avatar


    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Some where between right and wrong
    Posts
    471
    Rep Points
    2001200

    Quote Originally Posted by ForemanRules
    Well you have to realize Ali was getting paid more for a fight in 1974 then these Heavy Weights are today so the pay scale is down by 75% or more. Plus the 130-168lb classes are as good as ever right now.

    Still good boxing in these weight classes. Are you going to start a De La Hoya vs Mayorga thread?
    Courage is fear holding on a minute longer.
    -George S. Patton-

  8. #8
    Registered User


    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    12,542
    Rep Points
    15370977

    Quote Originally Posted by section8

    Still good boxing in these weight classes. Are you going to start a De La Hoya vs Mayorga thread?
    That is PPV I think and I wont pay extra to see any fight.....but I might for that one.
    I highly recommend all IronMagLabs supplements!
    www.ironmaglabs.com

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-06-2011, 11:06 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-11-2008, 09:52 AM
  3. Wladimir Klitschko, the new Lennox Lewis?
    By TJ Cline in forum Sports
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 05-05-2006, 07:27 PM
  4. Chris Byrd vs. Wladimir Klitschko
    By TJ Cline in forum Sports
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 04-22-2006, 04:14 PM
  5. I proved my point about Cardio!!
    By y2gt in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-08-2003, 11:52 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
-->