Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mr_Snafu said:The Americans have been dropping Napalm on civilians since 2003.
The Pentagon denied the reports of it by the BBC.
After 2 years of denials, the Pentagon now says, yes, they have been using Napalm.
The changed the name of the bomb.
And people care about these two f*kwits who are 2 amonth tens of thousands?
Give me a break.
ForemanRules said:The bodies showed signs of "barbaric torture" when they were found by American and Iraqi troops on Monday, a senior Iraqi general told Reuters on Tuesday.
Is their another kind of torture that is not "Barbaric"???
I love Big BrotherBigDyl said:Newspeak, son. We tourture the enemy humanely.
That is a good point, but to some degree it is sad that stupid children are the one's Governments send to die. If these men were 40+ then I would agree with you but they are just children and don't know better yet. This was is evil and both sides are to blame for it.Mr_Snafu said:Tough luck.
You live by the sword, you die by the sword.
They went to kill and got killed.
ForemanRules said:The bodies showed signs of "barbaric torture" when they were found by American and Iraqi troops on Monday, a senior Iraqi general told Reuters on Tuesday.
Is their another kind of torture that is not "Barbaric"???
Was Zarqawi not OBL's second in command? Was he not in Iraq? It doesn't matter who or where they hide. The fight needs to be where they are. Most of the countries where they hide support them. Do you think that the US, Canada, Britian, Australia or any others would let them take refuge in their country? Absolutely not, because they don't support terrorism. We (the world) cannot let terrorism take a stronghold.Decker said:Al Qaeda is an organization and not a country. Using military techniques in Iraq to subdue Al Qaeda is wrong headed.
There was no significant Al Qaeda presence in Iraq prior to the US invasion. Some Al Qaeda showed up there to pick off US troops after the invasion.dg806 said:Was Zarqawi not OBL's second in command? Was he not in Iraq? It doesn't matter who or where they hide. The fight needs to be where they are. Most of the countries where they hide support them. Do you think that the US, Canada, Britian, Australia or any others would let them take refuge in their country? Absolutely not, because they don't support terrorism. We (the world) cannot let terrorism take a stronghold.
True story!
Decker said:legitimizing the US's attack/occupation on/of Iraq is to legitimize the legal rationale for attacking Iraq in the first place and that is something I just cannot do.
Hi Al. I would have the US start to withdraw troops immediately.ALBOB said:Your entire post boils down to this and this is where I disagree. Maybe, just maybe we shouldn't have occupied Iraq. That's still up for debate, but is irrelevant to what I'm about to ask. The fact is, we DID invade. What would you have us do now?
My opinion? We're there. Al Qaeda is there. Let's get it on. Are innocent Iraqi civilians going to get caught in the crossfire. Yep, probably. Cold hearted ALBOB here, better innocent Iraqi's get caught in the crossfire while we're fighting THERE than innocent Americans while we're fighting HERE.