Jesu aod, you can't even use correct terminology. However, you do point out the obvious: beyond a certain functional length requirement, excess isn't required for sexual performance and partner gratification.
For an interesting read on the relative geometry of male/female genitals during coitus, see this article, an MRI study conducted in 2000.
More important to performance is erection fimnesss and duration. This would be the primary reason for the vast marketing success of male performance enhancing drugs. The use of various pills, surgical and mechanical enhancements have more benefit for the fragile male sexual psyche than has to do with female gratification.
I was looking through the data on that website; I decided it presented a objective analysis of an on-going survey, considering the unorthodox subject matter. Worth posting here, for its ability to address directly a number of questions and myths commented on recently within this forum:
Ethnicity and actual average length, versus within-in group perceptions. Interesting that the mythic proportions of blacks was inconsistant with actual measurements, whereas that for East Asians was consistant with actual measurements.
Age of approximate adult development (note the slight enhancement in the 3rd decade cohort? Thats the increase in the androgen receptor density in specific tissues, a function of age maturity in males that has been hinted at in the serious physiology and molecular biology biomedical research lit.
Lack of dimensional differences between sexual orientation
The difference between modestly and well endowed, by self perception, was only 1.5".
Sorry b reed23 no pictures, the problem is that my camera has not a good enough zoom, if i could at least zoom it in maybe times ten then you might get to see something to get excited about but alas...............
Male, 38 years old, 5ft 11", 187lbs
Goals; 10k sub 46mins 10 mile sub 77 mins
half marathon sub 120 mins