IronMagLabs Osta Rx


Five questions about school shootings.

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    __________
    clemson357's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,697
    Rep Points
    15167689

    Five questions about school shootings.






    Dennis Prager
    Five questions about shootings at universities
    By Dennis Prager


    http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | Question 1: Why are murderers always counted in the victims tally? The day after the mass murder of students at Northern Illinois University (NIU), the headline in the closest major newspaper, the Chicago Tribune, was: "6 Dead in NIU Shooting."


    "6 dead" included the murderer. Why wasn't the headline "5 killed at NIU"? It is nothing less than moronic that the media routinely lump murderers and their victims in the same tally.


    This is something entirely new. Until the morally confused took over the universities and the news media, murderers were never counted along with their victims. To give a military analogy, can one imagine a headline like this in an American newspaper after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor: "2,464 Dead in Pearl Harbor Attack"? After all, 55 Japanese airmen and nine Japanese crewmen also died in the attack.


    One can only assume that this mode of reporting murders is part of the larger movement toward non-judgmentalism and egalitarianism. To many Americans in academia, the media, and elsewhere, all the dead constitute a tragedy. Suggesting that some dead are more important than other dead is forbidden.


    At the San Francisco Zoo, after a young man was mauled to death by a tiger that had escaped its confines, the administrators of the zoo even lumped a killed animal with its human victim: the Zoo set up a memorial to both the man and the tiger. And, unsurprisingly, given the egalitarianism that now also lumps human beings with animals, the tiger received more condolence messages than the human it killed.


    Question 2: Which of these three options is more likely to prevent further murderous rampages: a) making universities closed campuses and increasing the police presence on campus (as the president of NIU has promised to do); b) making guns much harder to obtain; or c) enabling specially trained students and faculty to carry concealed weapons on campus?


    Because political correctness has replaced wisdom at nearly all universities, colleges are considering options a and b. But the only thing the first option will accomplish is to reduce the quality of university life and render the campus a larger version of the contemporary airport. And the second option will have no effect whatsoever since whoever wishes to commit murder will be able to obtain guns illegally.


    But if would-be murderers know that anywhere they go to kill students, there is a real likelihood that one or two students will shoot them first, and if in fact some would-be murderer is killed before he can murder any, or at least many, students, we will see far fewer such attempts made. Even though many of these murderers end up killing themselves, they don't want to die until they have first murdered as many students and teachers as possible.


    Of course, there is virtually no chance that the uniformly left-thinking individuals who run our universities will ever consider this option. To do so would mean abandoning what is essentially a religious-like conviction that guns are immoral rather than the people who use them immorally.


    Question 3: Why are "shooter" and "gunman" used instead of "killer" or "murderer"?


    If a murderer used a knife to murder five students, no news headlines would read, "Knifeman Kills Five." So why always "shooter" and "gunman"?


    The most obvious explanation is that by focusing on the weapon used by the murderer, the media can further their anti-gun agenda.


    Question 4: Why is "murder" never used to describe homicides involved in these university massacres? And why is "murderer" never used to describe these murderers? Why has "kill" become the only word allowed for deliberate homicide?


    Some will say that this is because "murder" is a legal term, and until one is convicted of murder in a court of law, the word should not be used.


    I find this unpersuasive. If these murderers can be described as having killed students, then they have in fact committed murder. I believe the major reason for the death of the words "murder" and "murderer" has to do, again, with an unwillingness to make moral judgments, and "murderer" is far more judgmental than "shooter."


    Question 5: Would the press note killers' religiosity if they were all Christian?


    Imagine for a moment that all the mass murderers at our universities were active Christians. Do you think that the press would at the very least note this? Of course it would, and it would be right to do so.


    Yet, to the best of my knowledge, all the recent university mass murderers were secular. Is this worth noting? And if not, why not? Of course, the answer is that few, if any, in the mainstream media would find such a thing worth noting and would likely bristle at its mention. To nearly everyone in the media, the secularism of all the murderers is a non-sequitur. But if they were all active Christians, the same media people would hardly view that fact as insignificant and unrelated.


    The fact is that nearly everyone in the mainstream media is secular and therefore cannot imagine associating secularism with anything negative. Secularism is presumed to be all good. But in truth, secularism, a blessing in government, is not a blessing in the lives of most individuals. Now, one can no more blame these college murders on secularism than one could blame Christianity if all the murderers were Christian. But in neither case would it be insignificant.

    JWR contributor Dennis Prager hosts a national daily radio show based in Los Angeles. He the author of, most recently, "Happiness is a Serious Problem". Click here to comment on this column. (both addresses):
    schmooze@jewishworldreview.com
    dennisprager@dennisprager.com
    ________________________

  2. #2
    Bohemian Extraordinaire
    ELITE MEMBER
    maniclion's Avatar


    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Mēns Incognita
    Posts
    27,074
    Rep Points
    930946225

    I think the reason media tallies all the deaths in the headlines is to make the incident seem more heinous, the higher the number of dead they can make it seem there were the more sensational it will seem....
    Coarse edged youth, the irish pendants string from their smiles
    not yet plucked as to slacken the seams
    and drag down the features of age,
    no folds or creases from unkempt wear
    eyes of tranquilty, crystalline-beads
    no sign of despair in their hair, nor their hearts
    but oh they have yet to be experienced and that makes aging so very worth it...ML circa2012

  3. #3
    __________
    clemson357's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,697
    Rep Points
    15167689

    I think that is part of it. Coupled with the fact that the headlines almost never read "murderer" or "killer," it seems to me the media is going out of their way not to pass judgment. This is exactly the opposite of what I would expect, as they sensationalize everything else; why won't they demonize the killer? Its all part of the attitude that society at large is partly to blame, or that inanimate objects are to blame, rather than the murderer. This mentality exacerbates the problem, IMO.
    ________________________

  4. #4
    Succinct
    ELITE MEMBER
    Witchblade's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    4,469
    Rep Points
    2519459

    Hardly compelling arguments.

    *waits for Willbrink to chime in with statistics*

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER


    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Gender
    Female
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    18,563
    Rep Points
    66150743

    There is more then 5 questions there.

    I reckon about 13

  6. #6
    Metrosexual
    ELITE MEMBER
    DOMS's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    In a van, down by the river...
    Posts
    32,686
    Rep Points
    1862244849

    Question 6: Why doesn't it happen at places like UC Berkeley?

    Answer: Because then it would be considered a public service.


  7. #7
    End of the world
    ELITE MEMBER
    Triple Threat's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Lost
    Posts
    11,276
    Rep Points
    74191663






    Quote Originally Posted by DOMS View Post
    Question 6: Why doesn't it happen at places like UC Berkeley?

    Answer: Because then it would be considered a public service.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-18-2011, 04:40 PM
  2. Can of worms; what causes school shootings?
    By iMan323 in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 02-16-2008, 01:44 PM
  3. 10 myths about school shootings
    By min0 lee in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 02-12-2007, 11:57 AM
  4. Shootings?
    By Burner02 in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-09-2003, 07:03 AM
  5. MD Sniper Shootings
    By meathead in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 10-28-2002, 10:24 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
DISABLED END -->