Primordialperformance.com


# of reps

Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: # of reps

  1. #1
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    236
    Rep Points
    8585908

    # of reps

    So my friend and I got in an argument about lifting today. He claimed that 8-12 reps is the best for building strength. I disagreed and said less reps and more weight is better for strength training.

    Whose right?

  2. #2
    SHRUG LIKE YOU MEAN IT
    MODERATOR

    Gazhole's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    11,055
    Rep Points
    177740615


    What was his reasoning behind 8-12 reps being better for strength training? It isn't, is the simple answer.
    http://www.getlifting.info

    This may hurt a little... - Training Journal 2012

    Disclaimer: All health, fitness, diet, nutrition, anabolic steroid & supplement information posted here is intended for educational and informational purposes only, and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice from a medical doctor. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. If you choose to use AAS it's your responsibility to know the laws of the country that you live in. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website.

  3. #3
    uncle z rep
    BOARD REP

    ontopthegame85's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Jacked & tan Inc
    Posts
    3,718
    Rep Points
    285555835


    I like 8-12 repps to.I would rather get stronger rep wise then max wise

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    B.C
    Posts
    283
    Rep Points
    1182811

    Strength training reps should be around 5 usually. 8-12 reps is not for strength training, but it's good for muscle building

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    236
    Rep Points
    8585908

    Quote Originally Posted by Gazhole View Post
    What was his reasoning behind 8-12 reps being better for strength training? It isn't, is the simple answer.
    He asked two of the personal trainers at our gym and they told him that.

  6. #6
    MDR
    MDR is offline
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    3,982
    Rep Points
    460385140


    Quote Originally Posted by N_I_C_K View Post
    He asked two of the personal trainers at our gym and they told him that.
    Figures. As an ex personal trainer, there are more bad ones than good ones.

  7. #7
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    236
    Rep Points
    8585908

    Quote Originally Posted by MDR View Post
    Figures. As an ex personal trainer, there are more bad ones than good ones.
    That is something I know, and he doesn't. How do they learn what they know anyways? Out of some college text book or something? I'd rather have proven results teach me what I need to know.

  8. #8
    LAM
    LAM is offline
    Is Doin It 4 Da Shorteez

    LAM's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Sin City
    Posts
    12,512
    Rep Points
    350347898


    * personally I have had success in the rep range of 6-10. when training with heavy loads at or above 80-85% of the 1RM reps 9-10 I usually hit using a rest-pause.

    Tudor Bompa recommends the 1-6 (6 being the ultimate max) reps at loads around 80-85% of the 1RM. Below is some text from his book Maximum Strength Training Second Edition page 234.

    "Training Methods and Duration for MxS"

    Exercises for the developement of MxS must not be carried out under the conditions of exhaustion as in the H phase. During MxS training, the muscle should be allowed to recover maximally between sets. Due to it's maximum activation of the central nervous system, and the high levels of concentration and motivation it requires, MxS training improves the links with the CNS that lead to improved muscle coordination and synchronization. Strength depends not only on the size of the muscle and the total number of cross bridges, but also on the CNS's capacity to "drive" that muscle.

    High activation of the CNS (i.e., muscle synchronization) also results in inhibition of the antagonistic muscles. When maximum force is applied, therefore, the antagonistic muscles are coordinated in such a way that they do not contract to oppose the movement-allowing the athlete to lift even heavier weights.
    Last edited by LAM; 09-08-2010 at 09:50 PM.
    I train differently than most, my beef is with gravity the weights on the bar are just the medium...Thanks to Wall Street your slice of the American Pie has been reduced to a crumb.

  9. #9
    fiendish thingy
    ELITE MEMBER

    fufu's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    18,431
    Rep Points
    60099873


    8-12 is great for training strength, but it depends on how it is factored into a complete program.
    fufu's 1337 Journal

    Your diet will set you free.

    I hate exercise, I love training.

  10. #10
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    113
    Rep Points
    1100238

    low reps/high weight = mass/strength, high reps/low weight = muscle definition. high reps/high weight = strength imo
    6'4" / 265 lbs/36 yrs old.bench 365 incline 275, decline 335,leg ext. machine; entire stack
    leg press 810lbs,sled 500lbs,seated dips 410lbs
    chest press 400lbs,shrugs 450-500lbs

  11. #11
    Greg

    gtbmed's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    1,639
    Rep Points
    19882373

    For building maximal strength, no.

    For building strength endurance, yes.

    There are a lot of components of strength. Louie Simmons is always talking about the 3-4 components of strength. I think 8-12 reps is fine for your assistance work but if you want maximal strength in a lift, you're going to have to lift maximal loads every once in awhile.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-18-2006, 11:22 PM
  2. High Reps vs Low Reps question
    By Shegan in forum Training
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-16-2005, 09:08 PM
  3. deadlifts....low reps or high reps?
    By rangers97 in forum Training
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 01-14-2005, 09:34 AM
  4. Squats, high reps vs. low reps
    By barc77 in forum Training
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-17-2002, 08:12 AM
  5. Forced Reps vs. Reps to Failure
    By LatinoHeat in forum Training
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-04-2001, 12:45 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.