Which is better?

Diesel · 09-29-2002, 11:10 AM

Ok iv been lifting with alot of weight less reps for a while and you know it was ok and all and the burn from it was ok .But the other day i tried less weight more reps and it worked my muscles more intensley.But then iv herd that more weight less reps will build muscles better.So my question is ,which is better less weight more reps,more weight less reps to bulk and tone?

Dr. Pain · 09-29-2002, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Deisel
So my question is ,which is better

Variety!

This is a catch-all word too...can mean, sets, reps, w8, exercises, and mutliple techniques.

While we always try to include some heavy lifts in most W/O's, it doesn't take much.....maybe one exercise, we then employ techniques such as Supersetting, Dropsets, Trisets and GIANT sets........ they all can work wonders...

But still...it's really the VARIETY....that helps with the Stress/Adaption function of lifting!

DP

kanun · 09-29-2002, 11:22 AM

Check out this link. It contains explanations of all the different work-out techniques - you may it useful!

NickB · 09-29-2002, 11:41 AM

Heavier, less reps will build strength and bulk
Less, more reps will build endurance

... right?

**Mudge** · 09-29-2002, 12:12 PM

Something like that yes, you will find women using high reps, or many people use high reps for legs. The "burn" has little to do with building large muscles, I'm sure you could find plenty of burn running a marathon, or lifting pink dumbells for 500 reps.

If you go too low in reps, you will largely be building strength. Many of the larger bodybuilders used 6-8 reps when going for mass.

09-29-2002, 11:10 AM	#1
Diesel ill show u string pea's Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Indiana Posts: 241	Which is better? Ok iv been lifting with alot of weight less reps for a while and you know it was ok and all and the burn from it was ok .But the other day i tried less weight more reps and it worked my muscles more intensley.But then iv herd that more weight less reps will build muscles better.So my question is ,which is better less weight more reps,more weight less reps to bulk and tone?

09-29-2002, 11:22 AM	#3
kanun renewbie Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Malta, Europe Posts: 195	Check out this link. It contains explanations of all the different work-out techniques - you may it useful!
	John C. No one will push you harder than you. "The unexamined life is not worth living" - Socrates

09-29-2002, 12:12 PM	#5
Mudge Pizza the Hut Super Moderator Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 22,997 Photos: 1	Something like that yes, you will find women using high reps, or many people use high reps for legs. The "burn" has little to do with building large muscles, I'm sure you could find plenty of burn running a marathon, or lifting pink dumbells for 500 reps. If you go too low in reps, you will largely be building strength. Many of the larger bodybuilders used 6-8 reps when going for mass.
	Kinesiology Vote @ Top 25 Deads Comp Bench Motivation Bench form MaxCalc Charles Poliquin When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be. Lao-Tzu I don't know any sources so don't ask - thanks

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

09-29-2002, 11:41 AM	#4
NickB Damn, so many new faces. Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: California Posts: 498	Heavier, less reps will build strength and bulk Less, more reps will build endurance ... right?