Primordialperformance.com


Is 400 the new 300?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 39 of 39
  1. #31
    Performance Enhanced
    ELITE MEMBER

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Noneya
    Posts
    1,040
    Rep Points
    19575843

    Quote Originally Posted by MDR View Post
    Really funny that everyone seems to be calling it a military press. Military press is standing. Pushing the weight overhead with no leg assistance. In the video, the lifter is performing a seated overhead press. The two lifts are far from equal. Military presses are far more difficult.
    End of rant.
    Good point. Still a big lift nontheless.
    Fear does not exist in any object or situation. It is constructed by you alone, a barrier to progress, imposed solely by your mind.

  2. #32
    MDR
    MDR is offline
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    3,982
    Rep Points
    460385140


    Quote Originally Posted by rippedgolfer View Post
    Good point. Still a big lift nontheless.
    Very true.

  3. #33
    GMO
    GMO is offline
    Senior Member
    BOARD REP

    GMO's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Under Your Bed
    Posts
    3,606
    Rep Points
    310442164


    Quote Originally Posted by rippedgolfer View Post
    When I started lifting in 2001, 300 was the benchmark for flat bench. Seems these days everyone benches 400+ lbs. I'm not sure if it's just a lot of people exagerating their bench press, or that sports training and nutrition have come a long way in the past ten years. Probably a combination of both. Please don't take this thread the wrong way. I'm not calling anyone a liar here or accusing people of lying about their bench press. I am just curious as to why people can lift so much more now as opposed to ten years ago.

    I've been lifting for almost ten years (will be ten years in April). I've been a member of six gyms and seen many, many massive men lift extremely heavy weight but only a handful of times have I seen someone bench 400 lbs. I can probably count the number of times on one hand. So what are your opinions on this? Is 400 really the new 300, or are people exagerating, or are supplements, training, and overall knowledge of weight lifting advanced that far in ten years that the new standard for bench pressing increased by a 100 lbs?

    Thanks for the responses and opinions. All feedback is welcome.
    There were very few people on my college team that could not meet the 300lb bench mark(Kickers, Punters, some DB's). Most of the lineman could easily eclipse 400lbs.

  4. #34
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    231
    Rep Points
    7940582

    Quote Originally Posted by GMO View Post
    There were very few people on my college team that could not meet the 300lb bench mark(Kickers, Punters, some DB's). Most of the lineman could easily eclipse 400lbs.
    That's very true. But, if you compare the average gym goers at a normal gym or university gym to ANY college football team the numbers don't even compare. Like, for a football player a 300-400 bench is what's expected but for a non-athlete I think is very good.

  5. #35
    Hell's Ambassador

    Hell's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,356
    Rep Points
    118896853


    I just broke 300 for the first time since I was 19. Fuck yea!!

    Hell

  6. #36
    Performance Enhanced
    ELITE MEMBER

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Noneya
    Posts
    1,040
    Rep Points
    19575843

    Quote Originally Posted by Hell View Post
    I just broke 300 for the first time since I was 19. Fuck yea!!

    Hell
    Nice job bro! You are an official mber of the 300 club.
    Fear does not exist in any object or situation. It is constructed by you alone, a barrier to progress, imposed solely by your mind.

  7. #37
    Anabolic Whore
    ELITE MEMBER

    ANIMALHAUS's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    PHILA.DELPH.I.A.
    Posts
    2,018
    Rep Points
    147075171


    I think it's safe to say 400lbs is the new 300lbs. 300 is common in my opinion.

  8. #38
    Registered User

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    50
    Rep Points
    381534

    I dropped the barbell on my chest last week trying to join the 300 club. Sucks as I think I could have done it (I did 285 warming up). This is at a Marine Corps gym, and there are probably 100 guys up on the wall with a 300 lift. There are maybe 50 with a 400 lb lift, and 10 or so with 500 or 600.

    In my normal gym in Thailand, there is only one guy there who can lift more than 300, but he is really over 400.

  9. #39
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    18
    Rep Points
    429893

    I guess I frequent the wrong gyms! The highest I've seen so far was around 345 and the guy was HUUUUUUGE. Also, everyone stopped and stared at him for about 10 minutes before, during, and after his lifts.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.