strength gains = muscle mass?

perfecto · 06-18-2003, 09:47 AM

ok because its hard to tell whether you are adding muscle due to seeing yourself everyday, is it probable to say that if you are increasing in lifts you are geting bigger? presuming you train heavy and high volume. Hope this question makes sense..

cheers

tjwes · 06-18-2003, 10:00 AM

Only if you are taking in more calories than you are burning off.You can definately get stronger without a correlating increase in muscle size.Simply look at powerlifters ,especially in the lower weight classes.

Twin Peak · 06-18-2003, 10:07 AM

They are correlated, but it certainly is not linear. But as a general rule of thumb, yes, you can assume as much.

I find, frequently, that strength gains happen first, then hypertrophy kicks in shortly thereafter.

Malachor · 06-18-2003, 02:14 PM

On the flipside of the question.

What do you lose first, muscle or strength?

Malachor · 06-18-2003, 02:17 PM

I apologize for being so broad. I would assume that you can keep muscle longer than strength if you continue to use the same weights and eat properly. Then I suppose you could assume that strength would hover if kept at the same weights and eatting properly.

Anymore incite on this?

Twin Peak · 06-18-2003, 02:18 PM

Personally, strength. I imagine that differs.

perfecto · 06-19-2003, 09:06 AM

whats the difference in training principles between powerlifting and normal mass building training?

Malachor · 06-19-2003, 06:56 PM

powerlifters do a lot of triples, doubles, and singles along with speed work, use of chains, and bands to work for the explosive power. they do box squats of various heights to strengthen their squats in certain areas to help gain that explosiveness. pretty much all of powerlifting is optimizing form to become more explosive and strong. they don't care what they look like, at least most of them it seems anyways.

powerlifting focused mainly on their three lifts: deadlift, squat, and bench. any other work they do is to strengthen these lifts in some way.

mass building obvious focuses on getting a symmetrical look and a big look for some. so you're going to basically do those 3 fundamental lifts as well, but you add the extra lifts that work best for your physique.

**Mudge** · 06-19-2003, 07:52 PM

Measurements every 2-4 weeks sound good. I can say that I can gain or lose strength and not be any different in size measurably, and really there is no direct correlation but there is some kind of relation in most people no doubt. Size can't be compared from one person to the next though and mean that they lift the same weights even if they are the same height/weight, and you can keep your weight down in PL classes and still increase in strength.

Many PLs are not as large or lean as bodybuilders, yet they are generally the stronger of the two.

Rep range, rest periods (and days between bodyparts), are the two primary differences I'd say, but also they are going to stick to more compound movements where BBs will mix it up a bit more and do a higher volume of total sets, and reps.

06-18-2003, 09:47 AM	#1
perfecto dirty but nice Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: land down under your mum Posts: 390 Photos: 5	strength gains = muscle mass? ok because its hard to tell whether you are adding muscle due to seeing yourself everyday, is it probable to say that if you are increasing in lifts you are geting bigger? presuming you train heavy and high volume. Hope this question makes sense.. cheers "a scientist who works out, your like Indiana Jones"..."I AM LIKE INDIANA JONES" "dont hate me cause im beautiful baby, hate me cause your mother thinks so"

06-18-2003, 10:00 AM	#2
tjwes "You Can`t Flex Fat" Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Upstate New York Posts: 456 Photos: 8	Only if you are taking in more calories than you are burning off.You can definately get stronger without a correlating increase in muscle size.Simply look at powerlifters ,especially in the lower weight classes. My Website: http://www.geocities.com/timbuktuweights/ My Forum: http://timwescott.proboards18.com/index.cgi

06-18-2003, 10:07 AM	#3
Twin Peak Peak Physiques™ Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: NY Posts: 7,870	They are correlated, but it certainly is not linear. But as a general rule of thumb, yes, you can assume as much. I find, frequently, that strength gains happen first, then hypertrophy kicks in shortly thereafter. www.DesignerSupps.com INTELLIGENT DESIGN™...lands on 1/1/2007 www.intelligentdesignmag.com

06-18-2003, 02:18 PM	#6
Twin Peak Peak Physiques™ Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: NY Posts: 7,870	Personally, strength. I imagine that differs. www.DesignerSupps.com INTELLIGENT DESIGN™...lands on 1/1/2007 www.intelligentdesignmag.com

06-19-2003, 09:06 AM	#7
perfecto dirty but nice Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: land down under your mum Posts: 390 Photos: 5	whats the difference in training principles between powerlifting and normal mass building training? "a scientist who works out, your like Indiana Jones"..."I AM LIKE INDIANA JONES" "dont hate me cause im beautiful baby, hate me cause your mother thinks so"

06-18-2003, 02:14 PM	#4
Malachor Registered User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 184	On the flipside of the question. What do you lose first, muscle or strength?

06-18-2003, 02:17 PM	#5
Malachor Registered User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 184	I apologize for being so broad. I would assume that you can keep muscle longer than strength if you continue to use the same weights and eat properly. Then I suppose you could assume that strength would hover if kept at the same weights and eatting properly. Anymore incite on this?

06-19-2003, 06:56 PM	#8
Malachor Registered User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 184	powerlifters do a lot of triples, doubles, and singles along with speed work, use of chains, and bands to work for the explosive power. they do box squats of various heights to strengthen their squats in certain areas to help gain that explosiveness. pretty much all of powerlifting is optimizing form to become more explosive and strong. they don't care what they look like, at least most of them it seems anyways. powerlifting focused mainly on their three lifts: deadlift, squat, and bench. any other work they do is to strengthen these lifts in some way. mass building obvious focuses on getting a symmetrical look and a big look for some. so you're going to basically do those 3 fundamental lifts as well, but you add the extra lifts that work best for your physique.

06-19-2003, 07:52 PM	#9
Mudge Dieting I swear! Super Moderator Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Here Posts: 23,477 Photos: 1	Measurements every 2-4 weeks sound good. I can say that I can gain or lose strength and not be any different in size measurably, and really there is no direct correlation but there is some kind of relation in most people no doubt. Size can't be compared from one person to the next though and mean that they lift the same weights even if they are the same height/weight, and you can keep your weight down in PL classes and still increase in strength. Many PLs are not as large or lean as bodybuilders, yet they are generally the stronger of the two. Rep range, rest periods (and days between bodyparts), are the two primary differences I'd say, but also they are going to stick to more compound movements where BBs will mix it up a bit more and do a higher volume of total sets, and reps. Kinesiology Comp Bench MaxCalc Motivation Bench form Charles Poliquin When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be. Lao-Tzu

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Neural Factors of Fatigue and How to Manage Them	Pirate!	Training	26	11-06-2009 11:10 AM
Great training thread...	Flex	Training	18	06-08-2005 09:11 AM
How do you get huge legs?	Vvitto	Training	46	05-30-2005 02:55 PM
interesting scientific article on protein intake (sorry it's sorta long...)	BerryBlis	Diet & Nutrition	2	11-04-2004 10:44 PM