![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Photo Gallery | Register | Members List | Videos | Blogs | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Training Learn proper form, techniques, & routines. Post questions about weight training as it relates to muscle building.
Sponsored by: BigBackGrips.com |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Elite Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,539
|
Squat Question
BODYBUILDING SUPPLEMENTS High Quality Supplements For Bodybuilders and Athletes. www.ironmaglabs.com I am fairly new to squats, certainly new to heavy squatting.
I worked out with a guy yesterday who insisted that I move my feet slightly forward while squatting. We also used a Smith machine (which I never have used before for squats.) Today, my butt...more specifically, my upper butt is so sore. To be honest, there is a muscle that is sore that I did not know was there. Clearly, I hit a muscle yesterday that I have not been hitting. I guess my question is, does proper form require your feet to be slightly forward? Or is this a variation? |
|
My Carb Cycling Progress - you can't hide from the numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
the one & only
Administrator
|
I do not believe in squatting on a Smith machine, it's dangerous and it restricts the natural arc movement in a squat. Use a free weight barbell, much safer and much more effective!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Elite Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,539
|
Quote:
|
|
|
My Carb Cycling Progress - you can't hide from the numbers.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
the one & only
Administrator
|
that's one of the common misconceptions of the Smith machine, don't get me wrong I like the Smith it has some great uses, but squats are not one of them.
As far as falling, I have been squatting for over 16 years, I have never fallen nor injured myself doing squats. One thing that is important is that you build up the coordination of the movement before you start going heavy, this is the biggest mistake people make, they try and go heavy before they have conditioned theselves and learned the movement. I plan to write an article on squats soon, I was hoping to do it for July, but I did not have time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Pizza the Hut
Super Moderator
|
You squat like you are sitting down, how are you going to fall over? You will naturally take the weight and move up and down in the safest way, sitting down and standing up is such a natural movement I dont see it happening. If you use a squat rack with the bars setup properly, you have nothing to worry about.
The only thing I have liked the smith for is for incline pressing. |
|
Kinesiology Vote @ Top 25 Deads Comp Bench
Motivation Bench form MaxCalc Charles Poliquin When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be. Lao-Tzu I don't know any sources so don't ask - thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guardian of The Homeland
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 17,077
|
By placing your feet forward, you are taking pressure off the quads!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Patrick
Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: AZ
Posts: 30,336
|
The problem with a smith machine squat is not so much that you are taking pressure off the quads because you aren' really. The final 10-15% of the movement is still knee extension. The real problem is that you are not efficiently driving through your center of gravity.
When you are performing a real barbell squat you are squating down in such away that allows you to drive straight through your center of gravity. Think if there were a rod running straight from your spine to the ground, it would move in a diagonal fashion with your spine as you squat down. This makes the exercise more functional, increases your balance and strengthens your stabalizing muscles. When you are performing a smith squat all of those things above go completely out the window. First you are pushing against a fixed bar, which will not improve your balance and coordination. Also, because it is a fixed bar you are doing nothing for your stabalizing musculature. And the biggest difference between barbell and smith sqauts is that in a smith squat you are displacing your center of gravity. You center of gravity is running straight down your spine when you are standing upright. Then when you lean back into the smith bar and keep your feet forward your center of gravity stays up in front of you as your spine and upper body move backwards to the bar. Now you are forced to drive through a false center of gravity which lies infront of your bodies core. Now if you did smith squats only and never did a barbell squat how well do you think you could effeciently lift things using your bodies natural center of gravity, not only in the gym but in real life? See my point.....it is not functional at all. When do you ever pick things up by sitting back like you do during a smith squat?? Never...you would fall over, right? Also since you are not strengthening your core musculature with the smith squat you are more likely to injure yourself trying to pick something up. My advice....lay off the smith machine. Grab a barbell and do real squats and your entire body will benefit. |
|
http://pwtraining.blogspot.com/.....come and see what is on my mind!
http://ivonneberkowitz.blogspot.com/....check out Ivonne's new blog! Optimum Sports Performance "In the beginners mind there are many possibilities, in the experts there are few." -Buddha's Little Instruction Book |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Pump Junky
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Iowa
Posts: 465
|
Good Post P-Funk!
|
|
Can't never did nothin,(Dedicated to my father)
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Top Ten Squat Tips | min0 lee | Training | 11 | 11-25-2005 05:23 PM |
| training theories - stop overtraining! | Mifody | Training | 27 | 10-19-2005 09:07 PM |
| Basic Squat question... | robousy | Training | 19 | 03-27-2005 06:30 PM |
| p/rr/s class presentation? | DeadBolt | Training | 22 | 12-02-2004 09:40 PM |
| Another Squat Question... | Monolith | Training | 24 | 02-28-2003 03:52 PM |