Primordialperformance.com


Stickin to the squats.

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    MP Minister of Pain!
    ELITE MEMBER

    DeadBolt's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ocean County NJ
    Posts
    7,561
    Rep Points
    3272684

    Stickin to the squats.

    Hey everyone just figure I would say I am still doing squats and its been like a month now and they are getting easier. I am still at lower weights but I have notcied an increase in overall strength of my legs. I can't wait to master them. Thanks for all the help with them.

    Im gonna save a post and throw a question in here, I hear people say that squats and deadlifts are like two of the best overall workouts to do. But my question is which do you do and when? I have heard of a few varieties and am not sure which one would be best for me and also what day do you do them on, legs? back?

    Thanks again everyone.
    "Only in dictionaries does SUCCESS come before WORK." -Alfred K. Henderson

    Today I do what others will not so that tomorrow I can do what others cannot!

  2. #2
    End of the world
    ELITE MEMBER

    Triple Threat's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Lost
    Posts
    11,316
    Rep Points
    63547645


    Squats on leg day. Deads on back day. At least 2 days in between.

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    50
    Rep Points
    302335

    Hi there,

    I am fairly new to debating on the internet!


    You ask for variety?

    I think frontsquats and deadlifts are the perfect combination for overall leg development. Frontsquats will target your quadriceps and take the lower back out of the equation. On the other hand you have the deadlift that targets your entire posterior chain -> lowerback, hamstrings, and buttocks. I think there is way to much overlap between the back squat and deadlift. I dont think there is any reason for doing both unless you are a powerlifter.

    I admit it takes a bit of practice and flexibility to master the frontsquat. But theres no reason to be afraid of doing frontsquats. I think frontsquats is a much safer alternative than the back squat. The weight is not resting on your back and it is easy to get rid of the weight and throw the weight away from your body. Thats my humble opinion.




    best regards

    Quadsweep
    Last edited by Quadsweep; 10-29-2003 at 11:39 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-31-2009, 03:16 PM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-22-2008, 07:59 AM
  3. Replies: 63
    Last Post: 05-12-2008, 10:08 AM
  4. Regular squats vs. squats with a smith rack
    By JerseyGuy in forum Training
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-05-2006, 04:47 PM
  5. Smith squats or barbell front squats?
    By RRG in forum Training
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-10-2005, 12:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.