I've read often that a lat pulldown should be performed by bringing the bar in front of your body, as opposed to behind the neck. Years back everybody brought it behind their neck.
Could you please explain why this is for me? I've suggested to some friends at the gym to change the way they're performing the exercise, but without knowing the reason behind my advice, well, I probably sound like I'm blowing smoke.
Thanks in advance.
At a high level, pulling the bar down behind the neck puts stress on the shoulder joint, in particular, the rotator cuff. It is now recommended to pull the bar down to the front to avoid possible injury to the shoulder.
Originally posted by Maki Riddington
Do what is most comfortable for you.
You mean I went through all the trouble of re-learning the movement for nothing?
I mean I had no problem doing it behind the neck, no discomfort or anything but I had experts telling me not to do it, have the "experts" opinion changed on this one?
I'm asking you this Maki because I know you know more about this than I do and I respect your opinion.
If you have proper ROM in and about the rotator cuff you will be fine.
If it causes discomfort then simply change it or stop doing it.
It's like saying that squatting azz to the ground is bad. It is if it is causing you discomfort, otherwise keep squatting.
pulldowns behind the neck are not a lat exercise, but a midback exercise - and not the best one as such, rows are a better and safer choice (rotatorcuff concerns as already mentioned.
Originally posted by cytrix
pulldowns behind the neck are not a lat exercise, but a midback exercise
I don't agree with that, the Latissimus Dorsi is the primary muscle used on rear pulldowns. At least that’s what all the books and different web sites with descriptions tell me.
I'm not going to get into the "Which is a true Lat exercise" debate, but I can tell you that in order to fully contract your lats you must arch your back. You can't do that when pulling the bar to the back of your neck. Pull it to your upper chest, arch your back, and get a good FULL squeeze in the fully contracted position. Remember that when doing any type of pulling movement for your lats; pull downs, chins, barbell/dumb bell rows, etc... Keep your head up and your back arched, you'll be able to feel the muscles working much better.
I don't agree with that, the Latissimus Dorsi is the primary muscle used on rear pulldowns. At least that’s what all the books and different web sites with descriptions tell me.
it's what i have found in the IRONMAN MAGAZINE infos and books, like the POF manuals etc.
I agree withcytrix and ALBOB. Pulling behind the neck can damage the rotator cuff if your not careful, but more importantly, involves the lats less. Go by how it feels. Your upper back(teres, rhombs, traps even) get a better workout than your lats on the behind the neck pull. Like ALBOB said, the most advantageous position for your lats is with your shoulder blades retracted, back slightly arched, pulling to the front of the chest. Every now and then I use behind the neck pulls for a good pump in my upper back after barbell rows with an underhand grip.
DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.