Primordialperformance.com


Is this effective?

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    In Him I live

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    23
    Rep Points
    10

    Question Is this effective?

    Hey all,

    Hehe Iam posting alot.

    neways... this a sample of a set i do for chest.

    warm-up- 1x95 for 12 reps

    work out - 1x135 for 10 reps
    1x155 for 6-8 reps
    1x185 for 3-4 reps

    now i have heard some people say its better to start in reverse? 185,155,then 135? But how will i know if i could start with a heavier weight and how much heavier? and what is the benefit going starting heavy first?

    this is weak i know, but thank God Iam improving.

    sorry if its a repeat post.

  2. #2
    Fueled by Testosterone
    MODERATOR

    CowPimp's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Silver Spring, MD
    Posts
    16,086
    Rep Points
    6502699

    Quote Originally Posted by DC-JB
    Hey all,

    Hehe Iam posting alot.

    neways... this a sample of a set i do for chest.

    warm-up- 1x95 for 12 reps

    work out - 1x135 for 10 reps
    1x155 for 6-8 reps
    1x185 for 3-4 reps

    now i have heard some people say its better to start in reverse? 185,155,then 135? But how will i know if i could start with a heavier weight and how much heavier? and what is the benefit going starting heavy first?

    this is weak i know, but thank God Iam improving.

    sorry if its a repeat post.
    It's better to start with heavier weights if your goal is to gain strength. If your goal is to induce hypertrophy, then the method you use will work just fine. However, I see no reason to short change your strength gains when you will probably grow just as much either way.

    It's simple to figure out. You obviously know you can do 185 for 3-4 reps. So, start with 185. If you hit it 5 or 6 times, then increase the weight next time.
    The only time it's bad to feel the burn is when you're peeing...

    CowPimp Chews Cud - My Journal
    1RM Videos

  3. #3
    In Him I live

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    23
    Rep Points
    10

    thanks cowpimp for reply.


    heres a newbie question...whats hyperthropy? If working the set in reverse will help me increase in strength then iam all for it.

  4. #4
    Fueled by Testosterone
    MODERATOR

    CowPimp's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Silver Spring, MD
    Posts
    16,086
    Rep Points
    6502699

    Quote Originally Posted by DC-JB
    thanks cowpimp for reply.


    heres a newbie question...whats hyperthropy? If working the set in reverse will help me increase in strength then iam all for it.
    Hypertrophy is, essentially, tissue or organ growth due to an increase in size, but not the number of cells. To be specific, I should really say muscular hypertrophy. However, since this is in the context of bodybuilding forums, it is assumed to be muscular hypertrophy when someone mentions hypertrophy without specifying otherwise.

    Hyperplasia is an increase in the number of cells. You aren't likely to experience this unless you use steroids.
    The only time it's bad to feel the burn is when you're peeing...

    CowPimp Chews Cud - My Journal
    1RM Videos

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Bonnybridge/Scotland
    Posts
    111
    Rep Points
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by CowPimp
    Hypertrophy is, essentially, tissue or organ growth due to an increase in size, but not the number of cells. To be specific, I should really say muscular hypertrophy. However, since this is in the context of bodybuilding forums, it is assumed to be muscular hypertrophy when someone mentions hypertrophy without specifying otherwise.

    Hyperplasia is an increase in the number of cells. You aren't likely to experience this unless you use steroids.
    (Hypertrophy means muscle growth)
    Hyperplasia is the splitting of muscle cells to create new cells once a muscle cell reaches its critical point it splits. Fiasica Stretching is a thought to be a great way to induce Hyperlasia. However skeletal hyperplasia in humans has not been scientificaly proven yet (it has however in animals).

    (The many stages of Bodybuilding)

Similar Threads

  1. most effective
    By petej in forum Training
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-13-2010, 07:00 AM
  2. Is HCG effective by itself?
    By soxmuscle in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 02-04-2006, 02:13 PM
  3. Which one is more effective?
    By krish in forum Sexual Health
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-06-2005, 12:35 PM
  4. Effective?
    By --CellTech-- in forum Training
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-24-2005, 10:24 PM
  5. which is more effective
    By Sniper in forum Training
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-23-2003, 10:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.