Yes. I beleive most everyone has this.
Is it common to have your "stong arm" (meaning whether you're left or right handed) to be slightly bigger than the other. Like for instance I'm right handed and everything from my right shoulder down is bigger than my left, very noticable in my tricepts and pretty noticable in my shoulders, not really visually noticable,but measurable, in my bicepts or forearms. Kinda scares me a little bit.
Yes. I beleive most everyone has this.
Kevin
"If you eat alot and workout hard and consistantly you will make good gains"
No one is perfectly symmetrical. As long as its not a huge difference, dont worry about it.
P-side Inc.
"the post-workout high is more profound than any drug-induced rush imaginable." -Dante B.


My arms are different by a little over 1/4" last I checked, its very normal. If it is by a large margin, then scoliosis could be an issue, but supposedly even mild scoliosis is more common than thought.
Motivation Bench form Charles Poliquin When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be. Lao-Tzu
Disclaimer: All health, fitness, diet, nutrition, anabolic steroid & supplement information posted here is intended for educational and informational purposes only, and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice from a medical doctor. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. If you choose to use AAS it's your responsibility to know the laws of the country that you live in. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website.
Yeah, Ive broken my left arm 3 times and surgery once. I have about a 3/4 inch difference in left and right. And the strength is still comprable.
Kevin
"If you eat alot and workout hard and consistantly you will make good gains"
Originally Posted by BigDyl
I'll have to remember that!!
Thanks for the feedback I was a little worried, but the strength is dead even though between my arms.
I actually had to do a paper on this when i was in school and did a lot of studying up on human physiology and biology. From what i had found, there are people who are solely right handed, people that are solely left handed, and people that are able to utilize both sides on equal but seperate levels. When we are born, and we establish which side (or both) is the stronger side then we begin to utilize that side more often. If you are right handed, then since you were an infant, you have been primarily using that side of your body and so that arm your entire life. This common utility builds muscle. Muscle built=more muscular fibers in that area. So if you didnt start working out routinely until you were 17yo... then for 17 years your right arm has built more muscular fibers than the left. when you begin working the arms together, the left side may perform the same weights, but doesnt have the same density as the right side. Coincidentaly, people that are right handed tend to store fat disproportionately also, storing more fat on their right side than left (not an obscene difference, but sometimes noticeable). This has to do with the body's natural inclination to provide efficient means for which it can consume energy. That also goes further into physiological study dealing with how right-handed people are more physicaly active than left-handed and naturally coordinated for motor skills, etc.... Long story.
Lastly, Left-handed people are said to live a 7% shorter life than right handed people... I am right-handed.
-----------------------
Put that steel on your back and give it a motherfucking ride, son.
I'm supposing that you have some evidence that supports your theory on hyperplasia?? As far as I'm aware, there is no evidence that such a thing occurs.Muscle built=more muscular fibers in that area. So if you didnt start working out routinely until you were 17yo... then for 17 years your right arm has built more muscular fibers than the left.
"in the howling bleeding nights, the dogs plunge into the Volga and swim desperately to gain the other bank. The nights of Stalingrad are a terror for them. Animals flee this hell; the hardest stones cannot bear it for long; only men endure."
i could actually post my paper if i need to, that would have all of the resources listed within it... but i wasnt talkin about hyperplasia. Hyperplasia suggests a condition that results in an abnormal increase in the number of normal-appearing cells... I was talking more about natural hypertrophy is the process by which a muscle that is subjected to a certain amount of work will as a result adjust its growth to compensate/prepare for a similar work load next time... which is the basis for all muscular growth. this isnt a matter of arguement, but just the basic fact... if you only did bi curls with your right arm for 20years , it would be stronger than your left. And as was stated already throughout the post, some people are stronger with their right hand than their left and vice-versa.
-----------------------
Put that steel on your back and give it a motherfucking ride, son.
Let me quote you once again:
Muscle built does not equal more muscular fibers in that area (what you said is concurrent with the definition of hyperplasia), but an increase in the size of the muscle fibers.Muscle built=more muscular fibers in that area
"in the howling bleeding nights, the dogs plunge into the Volga and swim desperately to gain the other bank. The nights of Stalingrad are a terror for them. Animals flee this hell; the hardest stones cannot bear it for long; only men endure."
well we learn somthing everyday!Originally Posted by Pizzer
Very informative and makes sense if you think about it...
I think this is fascinating. Do you have a reference to the studies that elaborate on what you say? I'm not disagreeing, just interested to know.Coincidentaly, people that are right handed tend to store fat disproportionately also, storing more fat on their right side than left (not an obscene difference, but sometimes noticeable).
"in the howling bleeding nights, the dogs plunge into the Volga and swim desperately to gain the other bank. The nights of Stalingrad are a terror for them. Animals flee this hell; the hardest stones cannot bear it for long; only men endure."
I write left-handed but play all sports with my right, so there isn't a noticeable or even measurable difference between my arms, except for my triceps which I neglected to do for my left at first. But for ex. my dad's right arm is more than 1" bigger than his left, and it's still not that obvious. So it shouldnt be a problem unless it affects balance or looks very odd.
Originally Posted by Duncans Donuts
Sorry, i thought that i had used the correct terminology in that equation (and i still think i did)... but by saying that muscle built equals more muscular fibers, i was referring to the size of the fibers... hence, the definition for the word muscular is: of or relating to having well-developed muscle size
My bad dude, i should have wrote muscle built=larger muscle fibers in that area![]()
-----------------------
Put that steel on your back and give it a motherfucking ride, son.
DISCLAIMER: