IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum


Go Back   IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum > BodyBuilding & Fitness Forums > Training
Photo Gallery Register Members List Videos Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Training Learn proper form, techniques, & routines. Post questions about weight training as it relates to muscle building.

Sponsored by: BigBackGrips.com


Incline Press - A Waste of Time?


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-26-2001, 05:29 PM   #1
Registered User
 
The Rose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 188

Post Incline Press - A Waste of Time?

Are incline presses really a waste of time? I've heard that you cannot target specific areas of a muscle such as the major pectorals (clavicular vs. sternum) because they are one smooth muscle, not two.
The Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2001, 06:00 PM   #2
Great American Nightmare
 
Mule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wheeling
Posts: 888

Post

Oh man here we go!

------------------
Im an Iron Addict!
Mule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2001, 05:10 AM   #3
pedal pedal pedal
Moderator
 
I Are Baboon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Beerville
Posts: 10,805
Photos: 10

Post

You asked that before, remember? And it started World War III. Check it out:
http://www.ironmagazine.com/ubb/Forum2/HTML/000329.html

Incline bench press is my favorite chest exercise.

It's all good!
I Are Baboon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2001, 08:47 AM   #4
I'm Dead Sexxxxy!!
Elite Member
 
Scotty the Body's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,970

Post

Yes, its all GOOD, just keep the angle on your bench no more than 30*.

Yes it is all one muscle with two different heads, you can emphasize one part more than the other doing different movements but you CANNOT isolate one over the other.

------------------
Just another day in the gutter
Scotty the Body is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2001, 08:57 AM   #5
the one & only
Administrator
 
Prince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 33,520
Blog Entries: 25
Photos: 313

View Member's Myspace Profile
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by I Are Baboon:
You asked that before, remember? And it started World War III. Check it out:
http://www.ironmagazine.com/ubb/Forum2/HTML/000329.html

Incline bench press is my favorite chest exercise.
Good memory, and good job finding the thread I Are Baboon!

I love incline press, no it's not a waste of time.




------------------
Just because the majority believes it, does not make it true!
Prince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2001, 12:55 PM   #6
Great American Nightmare
 
Mule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wheeling
Posts: 888

Post

Im with charger I like the DBs for now. For a change. I got 100's on the Inclines DBs the other day for almost 6. I was so proud. Well thats good for me since the shoulder injury!

------------------
Im an Iron Addict!
Mule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2001, 06:40 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chillin' in mah cribb, yo.
Posts: 598

Post

They are not a waste of time per se, but there are better exercises for the chest (decline press, dips, flyes).

And NO, you can't isolate of even emphasize the upper VS lower chest. I cannot believe this BS is still being parroted around...

------------------
Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.
TheSupremeBeing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2001, 10:58 PM   #8
Pump Junky
 
Charger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Iowa
Posts: 465

Banned

I'm with Mule!



I also love inclines done as Scotty said, 30* incline. I prefer DB presses and flies.

------------------
Can't never did nothin,(Dedicated to my father)
Charger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2001, 05:50 AM   #9
Registered User
 
The Rose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 188

Post

I think I agree with the Supreme Being!
The Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2001, 07:16 AM   #10
I'm Dead Sexxxxy!!
Elite Member
 
Scotty the Body's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,970

Post

Quote:
Originally posted by The Rose:
I think I agree with the Supreme Being!
That's fine, I guess books speak more to you than experience then, your choice.

If you can't even emphasize one part of the muscle over the other, than why would we bother doing more than one exercise for it?

------------------
Just another day in the gutter

<FONT COLOR="#000002" SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana, Arial">[Edited 1 time by Scotty the Body on 07-28-2001 at 09:37 AM]</font>
Scotty the Body is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2001, 07:51 AM   #11
Registered User
 
Slim Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 54

Post

<IMG SRC="http://www.ironmagazine.com/ubb/image_uploads/michael.gif" border=0>

I found this picture of TSB, he might have a lot of book knowledge but I don't think he even lifts weights. Think I'll stick with my inclines.

------------------
I wish I hadn't eatin that.
Slim Jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2001, 08:44 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chillin' in mah cribb, yo.
Posts: 598

Post

LOL...yeah that's really me you idiot.

Scotty, I'm sorry you can't understand the scientific aspects of it, so ask yourself this: Have you EVER seen anyone change the shape of their chest? Take a look at the thousands of before and after photos, find just ONE and I'll never say you can't train them seperately again.

You don't speak from experience, you speak from wishful thinking and muscle mag articles, and prolly some gym talk as well.

------------------
Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.
TheSupremeBeing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2001, 09:19 AM   #13
I'm Dead Sexxxxy!!
Elite Member
 
Scotty the Body's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,970

Post

Your right, I can't back it up.
But I'd still like to know what's the point of doing more than one exercise for say chest if you can't emphasize any part of it?

I mean, I might as well just do a set of dips and move on. right?


------------------
Just another day in the gutter
Scotty the Body is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2001, 09:26 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chillin' in mah cribb, yo.
Posts: 598

Post

Exactly! Pick a press (preferably decline or dips), pick a flye. The press works the pecs in it's strongest range and with the aid of the delts and triceps, and the flye eliminates the weak links allowing for maximal stimulation of the pecs.



------------------
Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.
TheSupremeBeing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2001, 08:30 PM   #15
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 63

Post

supreme-Incline for your upper chest, decline for lower, and regular bench for your whole chest.
walter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2001, 02:10 AM   #16
Designer Supplements
 
Robboe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 5,151

Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Scotty the Body:you can emphasize one part more than the other doing different movements but you CANNOT isolate one over the other.

So fook, you can emphasise more, but that won't spur localised growth. Why 'cheat' yourself by doing an inferior exercise [in comparison to decline or weighted dips]?

Flat/decline bench for compound movement.
A flye for 'isolation' - basically to remove the weak links of the compound movement [triceps and delts.]

Rah rah rah...


------------------
I'll type a good one when i feel like it...
Robboe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2001, 08:37 AM   #17
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Kalamazoo,MI USA
Posts: 350

Post

If inclines are such an inferior exercise then why do you do them CD?

------------------
"I figure,f*ck it.While I'm at it why not just shoot my buddy,take his job,give it to his sworn enemy,hike up gas prices,bomb a village,club a baby seal,hit the hash pipe and join the national guard....I could be elected president."
ballast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2001, 08:44 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chillin' in mah cribb, yo.
Posts: 598

Post

Inclines are crap.

On an incline press the weak links will ALWAYS fail before the chest (unless pre-exhaust or a similar technique is applied). Shoulders and triceps are the weak links, putting the bench on an incline will bring the shoulders more into play, and put the chest in its weakest position. The pec (major) primary function is to pull the arm across the chest and downward - therefore a decline press/dips are the best among the presses. A dip/decline press will minimize the weak links (the lats will come into play more, but they are generally not a "weak" link and will not fail before the chest), and put the chest in its strongest position.

Don't buy into that "you can work the upper chest with incline presses and the lower with declines!" crap. This is not possible because of the pecs anatomy.

In case you don't get the point - you should work the chest in its strongest position and minimize the weak links, and do not waste time trying to target the upper/lower chest individually.



------------------
Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.
TheSupremeBeing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2001, 08:48 AM   #19
Designer Supplements
 
Robboe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 5,151

Post

Quote:
Originally posted by ballast:
If inclines are such an inferior exercise then why do you do them CD?
I'm dropping them after i cut. I'm keeping them for now cause i don't want to change anything while i cut. When i'm done cutting they is outta here.


------------------
Wantin' ta be big iz da schiznit...

I iz da schiznit...

Wannabebig is da schiznit...
Robboe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2001, 09:15 AM   #20
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Kalamazoo,MI USA
Posts: 350

Post

Chicken Daddy-by your own admission,you are cheating yourself by doing an inferior exercise, aren't you?
I don't see why dropping them would affect your "cutting", especially if they are such an "inferior" exercise.
I don't mean to insult your intelligence, but, Why would you try to disuade someone from doing an exercise(because it is supposedly useless),when you yourself are doing the same exercise?

------------------
"I figure,f*ck it.While I'm at it why not just shoot my buddy,take his job,give it to his sworn enemy,hike up gas prices,bomb a village,club a baby seal,hit the hash pipe and join the national guard....I could be elected president."
ballast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2001, 09:29 AM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chillin' in mah cribb, yo.
Posts: 598

Post

...To avoid having to re-learn the exercise robbing himself of muscle stimulation.

------------------
Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.
TheSupremeBeing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2001, 09:36 AM   #22
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Kalamazoo,MI USA
Posts: 350

Post

He's a big boy,Supreme.Let him answer for himself.
And what do you mean "re-learn"?According to CD, after he is done "cutting", the inclines is outta here.So no need to re-learn, right?

------------------
"I figure,f*ck it.While I'm at it why not just shoot my buddy,take his job,give it to his sworn enemy,hike up gas prices,bomb a village,club a baby seal,hit the hash pipe and join the national guard....I could be elected president."
ballast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2001, 11:06 AM   #23
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Kalamazoo,MI USA
Posts: 350

Post

Don't feel bad Supreme.I'm glad I'm not chicken daddy either.He sounds like a damn hypocrite.

------------------
"I figure,f*ck it.While I'm at it why not just shoot my buddy,take his job,give it to his sworn enemy,hike up gas prices,bomb a village,club a baby seal,hit the hash pipe and join the national guard....I could be elected president."
ballast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2001, 11:26 AM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chillin' in mah cribb, yo.
Posts: 598

Post

Chicken is coo, but he's a stupid english bloke.

------------------
Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.
TheSupremeBeing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2001, 04:17 PM   #25
Fat Bastard
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 383

Post

Chicken Daddio is da shiznit

------------------
Exercise, my drug of choice
Maki Riddington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2001, 07:35 PM   #26
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 63

Post

This is just amazing supreme, you don't think Inclines and Declines work the Upper and Lower parts of your chest?? Is that what you are trying to say?? Well from "experience" I have always done declines and inclines, and yes your upper chest does shrink if you stop doing them. You just can't do the regular bench press for chest development, Inclines build that mass on the upper portion of the chest, like you don't have. Why don't you stop giving advice to all these people, when you are a weakling yourself. You act like a PT or something, and you are full of crab, 99% of the time. You think you know all this stuff about weightlifting, or powerlifting or whatever you try to do, but the truth is you don't know how to work your own body. YOu are a a person who reps out 185 3 times for 10 sets, takes off your shirt and admires yourself. I wish I knew where you lifted so I could come down there and show you what "real" weighttrainingris. Keep on giving advice to these poor guys, and see there results shoot right down the drain.
walter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2001, 08:09 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chillin' in mah cribb, yo.
Posts: 598

Post

Quote:
Originally posted by walter:you don't think Inclines and Declines work the Upper and Lower parts of your chest?? Is that what you are trying to say??
Exactly.



------------------
Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.
TheSupremeBeing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2001, 10:25 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chillin' in mah cribb, yo.
Posts: 598

Post

I answered for him because he just went offline.

By re-learn I mean that if he were to switch exercises it would take 4-6 weeks for him to gain any muscle off of the new movement due to the time the nervous system requires to optimize itself. When cutting you want to do everything in your power to keep building muscle a top priority, and switching exercises would take him a step back in his quest for hypertrophy.

------------------
Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.
TheSupremeBeing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2001, 10:41 PM   #29
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Kalamazoo,MI USA
Posts: 350

Post

I didn't say for him to switch exercises, I said why didn't he Drop them if they were inferior.According to his log he is doing benches and flyes in addition to inclines.In his earlier thread, he stated to do a bench and a fly, so by eliminating the inclines there is no need to switch exercises.According to him, he would have all he needs with the benches and flyes.Right?

------------------
"I figure,f*ck it.While I'm at it why not just shoot my buddy,take his job,give it to his sworn enemy,hike up gas prices,bomb a village,club a baby seal,hit the hash pipe and join the national guard....I could be elected president."
ballast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2001, 10:56 PM   #30
Senior Membe