New workout

Psycho Dad · 08-18-2005, 02:35 AM

1.bench press 10 sets
incline press 10 sets
cable crossovers 5 sets

skull crushers 8 sets
dips 8 sets

2.Barbell rows 8 sets
wide grip lat pull ups 8 sets
T-bar rows 5 sets

barbell curls 7 sets
hammer curls 6 sets

3. squats 10 sets
hack squats 5 sets
sl dl 8 sets
standing calf's raise 9 sets

each workout done 2 times a week.

Akkers · 08-18-2005, 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psycho Dad

1.bench press 10 sets
incline press 10 sets
cable crossovers 5 sets

FAR TOO MUCH VOLUME - 4 SETS PER EXERCISE. CABLE CROSSOVERS ARE MORESO FOR REFINING A CHEST, SO INSTEAD I'D STICK WITH FLYES OR PULLOVERS.

skull crushers 8 sets
dips 8 sets

FAR TOO MUCH VOLUME - 4 SETS PER EXERCISE. I'D GET RID OF DIPS AND PUT SOME CLOSE-GRIPS IN

2.Barbell rows 8 sets
wide grip lat pull ups 8 sets
T-bar rows 5 sets

TOO MUCH VOLUME - INCLUDE DEADLIFTS AND DO 3 SETS PER EXERCISE

barbell curls 7 sets
hammer curls 6 sets

TOO MUCH VOLUME - I'D DO 4 SETS OF BARBELL CURLS AND 3 SETS OF HAMMERS

3. squats 10 sets
hack squats 5 sets
sl dl 8 sets
standing calf's raise 9 sets

TOO MUCH VOLUME -

SQUATS - 5 SETS
HACKS - 3 SETS
SLDL'S - 3 SETS
STANDING CALF RAISES - 3 SETS

each workout done 2 times a week.

ID DO ONE WORKOUT A WEEK - 2 ON, 1 OFF, 2 ON, 2 OFF

WHERE IS YOUR SHOULDER WORK?
MILITARY PRESSES - 3 X 8-10
FRONT RAISES - 3 X 10-12
LATERAL RAISES - 3 X 12-15

Thoughts in CAPS.

Psycho Dad · 08-18-2005, 02:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Akkers

Thoughts in CAPS.

thanks for the imput.....but I disagre with you 100%

**CowPimp** · 08-18-2005, 03:38 AM

Are you juicing? If not, then you are going to have to work at levels far from failure to avoid overtraining in the long run. As well, your workouts are going to be needlessly long; you are going to step into highly catabolic hormone territory with workouts of that volume.

I would say this should be done very briefly (Maybe 2 weeks) and with lower intensity and/or deconditiong weeks to follow.

Psycho Dad · 08-18-2005, 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CowPimp

Are you juicing? Yes If not, then you are going to have to work at levels far from failure to avoid overtraining in the long run. As well, your workouts are going to be needlessly long; you are going to step into highly catabolic hormone territory with workouts of that volume.

I would say this should be done very briefly (Maybe 2 weeks) and with lower intensity and/or deconditiong weeks to follow.

I want advice from people who have more than 14.5 inch arms and are over 19 years old....but thanks for the input.

Akkers · 08-18-2005, 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psycho Dad

I want advice from people who have more than 14.5 inch arms and are over 19 years old....but thanks for the input.

Of course, what do I know. Have fun on that regimen, your muscles and CNS will love you soon...

Psycho Dad · 08-18-2005, 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Akkers

Of course, what do I know. Have fun on that regimen, your muscles and CNS will love you soon...

CNS........explain to me in detail the workings of the Central Nervous system.

Tough Old Man · 08-18-2005, 05:28 AM

a total of 214 sets a week. I see nothing wrong with it.,Now debate me and tell me your theroy that this is to many sets a week.

Akkers · 08-18-2005, 05:41 AM

This many sets will cause too much stress on joints and muscle fibres. As well as not allowing the muscles enough time to recuperate, it will place stress on your CNS, causing stagnant gains, and possibility of a breakdown of your immune system.

That is all I have to say.

Psycho Dad · 08-18-2005, 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Akkers

This many sets will cause too much stress on joints and muscle fibres. As well as not allowing the muscles enough time to recuperate, it will place stress on your CNS, causing stagnant gains, and possibility of a breakdown of your immune system.

That is all I have to say.

I see that you have no ability to intelligently explain your wild theory's.....
I suggest you go read a book.

Doublebase · 08-18-2005, 07:02 AM

I thought he was joking or maybe typed wrong. That is the worst program I have seen to date on this forum. I don't feel I have to explain myself. Unless your Arnold how could you think that program is good. Wow, do some reading buddy.

goandykid · 08-18-2005, 07:03 AM

Just som1 messing around or obviously retarded. Him and his buttbuddy tough should hav about half their recent posts deleted.

chunky34 · 08-18-2005, 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psycho Dad

I see that you have no ability to intelligently explain your wild theory's.....
I suggest you go read a book.

If you think that low volume doesn't work and you need an Arnold routine to grow, you really really need to get yourself inform man. You came here for advice, but you are rejecting every single guy that comes to help you.

If you don't believe in overtraining, then just too bad. But don't say or think that low volume isn't better for muscle growth. Go in intensemuscle forums for example and ask Doggcrapp, InHuman or Massive G brother.

I'M also a big fan or very low volume. I'm now doing only 1 set per bodypart each 5 days, and I gain strength every single time, which isIMO a good sign of potential muscle growth.

HardTrainer · 08-18-2005, 08:18 AM

I reckon this guy has been on this forum for awhile under a different user name, and now pissing about with this one, can mods search easily for matching IP`s?

007 · 08-18-2005, 08:40 AM

Seems a lot to me.

Sam40 · 08-18-2005, 08:42 AM

Looks, and sounds like a troll to me, at least he has the intelligence of one. That is the usual method of a troll to cause aggravation, and general chaos on a board. The admin can find his IP, the board should be recording it on every post. Mine does!.
Although he would need a different IP to register, than his original since this is a closed board. But he can change his screen name on the board, and keep the original IP.

LexusGS · 08-18-2005, 08:44 AM

i do about 750 sets a week. works out fine for me.

largepkg · 08-18-2005, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HardTrainer

I reckon this guy has been on this forum for awhile under a different user name, and now pissing about with this one, can mods search easily for matching IP`s?

Bingo!

**CowPimp** · 08-18-2005, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psycho Dad

I want advice from people who have more than 14.5 inch arms and are over 19 years old....but thanks for the input.

Even if those numbers were correct, they don't mean that I am ignorant on the topic of resistance training. Also, those statements I made were directed toward you only if you weren't juicing. I really don't know much about how steroids can affect one's ability to train with a much higher volume.

ChrisROCK · 08-18-2005, 12:14 PM

What a worthless Troll!

musclepump · 08-18-2005, 12:33 PM

Doublebase · 08-18-2005, 01:17 PM

I think I'm gonna rub one off to both of yours sigs.

**P-funk** · 08-18-2005, 01:21 PM

I think it looks like a great workout. give it a shot.

**CowPimp** · 08-18-2005, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by P-funk

I think it looks like a great workout. give it a shot.

Heh.

Psycho Dad · 08-19-2005, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by P-funk

I think it looks like a great workout. give it a shot.

thankyou for the advise i will start it and let everybodys how it goas

god hand · 08-19-2005, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chunky34

I'M also a big fan or very low volume. I'm now doing only 1 set per bodypart each 5 days, and I gain strength every single time, which isIMO a good sign of potential muscle growth.

I've gotten way stronger on bench, but still same size, that was a stupid post!

Squaggleboggin · 08-19-2005, 05:26 PM

I say just let him do whatever workouts he wants to do. He'll eventually figure out what works and what doesn't... 'eventually' being the key word of course...

buildingup · 08-19-2005, 05:30 PM

This has got to be the funniest post ever!!! physco i wish you luck on your errrrrrr journey of discovery

Squaggleboggin · 08-19-2005, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by god hand

I've gotten way stronger on bench, but still same size, that was a stupid post!

If he found what works for him and he's constantly making gains, why is it a stupid post? Sure, he shouldn't have said that low volume is better period, because its different for everybody, but at least he posted why he thinks so. I am also having a lot of success with low volume lifting, more than I've ever had before. I do fifteen reps per exercise including warming up, and it's working. You should also take into account that different individuals have not only different bodies, but different goals. I wouldn't be doing such a low volume routine if I weren't trying to gain strength exclusively.

08-18-2005, 02:35 AM	#1
Psycho Dad huge unit Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Bathroom Posts: 361	New workout 1.bench press 10 sets incline press 10 sets cable crossovers 5 sets skull crushers 8 sets dips 8 sets 2.Barbell rows 8 sets wide grip lat pull ups 8 sets T-bar rows 5 sets barbell curls 7 sets hammer curls 6 sets 3. squats 10 sets hack squats 5 sets sl dl 8 sets standing calf's raise 9 sets each workout done 2 times a week.

08-18-2005, 03:38 AM	#4
CowPimp Fueled by Testosterone Moderator Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Silver Spring, MD Posts: 15,428	Are you juicing? If not, then you are going to have to work at levels far from failure to avoid overtraining in the long run. As well, your workouts are going to be needlessly long; you are going to step into highly catabolic hormone territory with workouts of that volume. I would say this should be done very briefly (Maybe 2 weeks) and with lower intensity and/or deconditiong weeks to follow.
	The only time it's bad to feel the burn is when you're peeing... CowPimp Picks Up Heavy Shit MySpace YouTube Videos

08-18-2005, 07:03 AM	#12
goandykid Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 4,379	Just som1 messing around or obviously retarded. Him and his buttbuddy tough should hav about half their recent posts deleted.
	You guys are going to lose. You might as well just cheer for me, because Boston isn’t winning in Boston for the season opener. I’m sorry. " - Gilbert Arenas

08-18-2005, 08:18 AM	#14
HardTrainer Member Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 472	I reckon this guy has been on this forum for awhile under a different user name, and now pissing about with this one, can mods search easily for matching IP`s?
HardTrainer Member Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 472

08-18-2005, 08:40 AM	#15
007 Registered User Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 273	Seems a lot to me.
007 Registered User Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 273	"O mankind! Eat of that which is lawful and wholesome in the earth, and follow not the footsteps of the devil. Lo! he is an open enemy for you." Q(2:168)

08-18-2005, 05:28 AM	#8
Tough Old Man Canine club CEO Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: baja calif, Mexico Posts: 6,933 Photos: 1	a total of 214 sets a week. I see nothing wrong with it.,Now debate me and tell me your theroy that this is to many sets a week.

08-18-2005, 05:41 AM	#9
Akkers The Gazelle or The Lion? Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 266	This many sets will cause too much stress on joints and muscle fibres. As well as not allowing the muscles enough time to recuperate, it will place stress on your CNS, causing stagnant gains, and possibility of a breakdown of your immune system. That is all I have to say.

08-18-2005, 07:02 AM	#11
Doublebase Lightweight, Ya Buddy! Elite Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Philly Posts: 6,631	I thought he was joking or maybe typed wrong. That is the worst program I have seen to date on this forum. I don't feel I have to explain myself. Unless your Arnold how could you think that program is good. Wow, do some reading buddy.

08-18-2005, 08:42 AM	#16
Sam40 Alley-oop! Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: North Carolina Posts: 174	Looks, and sounds like a troll to me, at least he has the intelligence of one. That is the usual method of a troll to cause aggravation, and general chaos on a board. The admin can find his IP, the board should be recording it on every post. Mine does!. Although he would need a different IP to register, than his original since this is a closed board. But he can change his screen name on the board, and keep the original IP.

08-18-2005, 08:44 AM	#17
LexusGS 3UZFE Join Date: May 2005 Location: United States Posts: 2,636	i do about 750 sets a week. works out fine for me.

08-18-2005, 12:14 PM	#20
ChrisROCK ///M Rider Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Southern NYS Posts: 793 Photos: 5	What a worthless Troll!
	Maximus: "What we do in life, echoes in eternity." http://kandeecup.tripod.com/gif "Success does not necessarily mean advancement;... it refers to the accomplishment or sense of achievement one obtains from trying one's best... I...enjoy the process of become stronger and more muscular."

08-18-2005, 12:33 PM	#21
musclepump Celebrity PersonalTrainer Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 6,666 Photos: 128
	Let's all join together and SPEAK ENGLISH IN AMERICA.

08-18-2005, 01:17 PM	#22
Doublebase Lightweight, Ya Buddy! Elite Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Philly Posts: 6,631	I think I'm gonna rub one off to both of yours sigs.

08-18-2005, 01:21 PM	#23
P-funk Patrick Super Moderator Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: AZ Posts: 30,625	I think it looks like a great workout. give it a shot.
	http://pwtraining.blogspot.com/.....come and see what is on my mind! Ivonne's Blog on Health and Wellness! Optimum Sports Performance "In the beginners mind there are many possibilities, in the experts there are few." -Buddha's Little Instruction Book

08-19-2005, 05:26 PM	#27
Squaggleboggin Functional Lifting = Life Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 3,540 Photos: 3	I say just let him do whatever workouts he wants to do. He'll eventually figure out what works and what doesn't... 'eventually' being the key word of course...
	Push yourself. Enjoy yourself. Be yourself. Knowledge is power. Obsessed with functional strength. Journal

08-19-2005, 05:30 PM	#28
buildingup Elite Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 1,101	This has got to be the funniest post ever!!! physco i wish you luck on your errrrrrr journey of discovery
buildingup Elite Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 1,101