Yes, there is much less impact than running outside on say a street, sidewalk, etc.

Im assuming that it is but I figure it doesnt hurt to ask, is the treadmill easier on your legs than running? Better by a wide margin?
Yes, there is much less impact than running outside on say a street, sidewalk, etc.
yes, but teadmills SUCK!. I used to have one, and I gave it to a guy I didn't like.I would rather ride my bicycle.
eliptical machines are the best
I always see fat people on thoseOriginally Posted by MyK
and fit people running
I know, the fatties alwayse hold them selves up. this is wrong. and when you enter your body weight you have to add 30lbs. and on the ones i use you can crank up the intensity.Originally Posted by ForemanRules
running and bikes are to strenuous on my knee so I have no real choice![]()
http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/treadmill.html
I came across this article with several medical journals as sources. Basically, it seems to say that jogging outside takes a little bit more energy, and this amount of energy increases with speed. There is a lot of other good information regarding inclines, sports specificity, etc.
The only time it's bad to feel the burn is when you're peeing...
CowPimp Chews Cud - My Journal
1RM Videos
Originally Posted by CowPimp
Interesting article - and it all seems to make sense. If you want to run fast on a treadmill you train on a treadmill and if you want to run fast on the ground you train on the ground.
____________________________________________
Restless soul, enjoy your youth.
Like Muhammad. Hits the truth.
Can't escape from the common rule - if you hate something don't you do it too.
DISCLAIMER: