do you burn more fat off the stomach doin slower longer running on like a treadmill

adamf4i · 09-17-2005, 02:30 PM

or stairstepper like on the treadmill say 4.5 speed nice lil steady jog for say like 30 minutes is that gonna burn more fat then running a faster speed for 30 minutes cause i keep hearing that lower speed is burning more fat and faster speed is just cardio i dont get it ,sorry if this is dumb question but any advice i would appreciate , i cant exactly remmeber the speed of the stairmaster but its like level 7 would be slower walk up then like 11

**CowPimp** · 09-17-2005, 02:39 PM

Lower intensity cardio is what optimizes fat burning during the activity itself. However, shorter intense cardio sessions can give you a really awesome metabolism boost afterwards. Either way is effective.

LAM · 09-17-2005, 02:40 PM

the higher the intensity of exercise the more glucose/glycogen utililized for energy during the training session and the more fat will be oxidized post exercise.

MuscleM4n · 09-17-2005, 03:33 PM

'more fat off the stomach' is not possible

Body fat is lost evenly throughout the body when you take in less calories than you need.

Just that some people have a predeposition for adding it to different places.

The Monkey Man · 09-17-2005, 03:51 PM

What ever exercise you can do longer will burn more...

But in general... The higher the intensity... the higher the burn -

morningtime00 · 09-18-2005, 11:14 AM

lol i love how people think there is such a thing as "target weightloss" lol

adamf4i · 09-18-2005, 11:44 AM

??????????????????

Quote:

Originally Posted by morningtime00

lol i love how people think there is such a thing as "target weightloss" lol

MuscleM4n · 09-18-2005, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by morningtime00

lol i love how people think there is such a thing as "target weightloss" lol

yeah - I hate it

When woman say "i need to do some sit-ups to burn some fat form my stomach" drives me crazy!

MWpro · 09-18-2005, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by morningtime00

lol i love how people think there is such a thing as "target weightloss" lol

Any logical person (see Cowpimp and LAM above) would have disregarded the "off the stomach" part and just answered his question.

MuscleM4n · 09-18-2005, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MWpro

Any logical person (see Cowpimp and LAM above) would have disregarded the "off the stomach" part and just answered his question.

No, becuase the stomach fat is what is bothering the guy in the first place.

So just giving advice that target weightloss does not exist so the person doesn't end up doing 1000 sit-ups a day.

Psch91 · 09-18-2005, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MWpro

Any logical person (see Cowpimp and LAM above) would have disregarded the "off the stomach" part and just answered his question.

Uhm, no? They are trying to help him out, even if he didnt ask for that particularly. Next month he will make a thread about not losing weight on his stomach, because he believes he can spot reduce. Those "illogal" people helped him out, while you on the other hand, called them out on it, and added nothing to the original question. They actually helped him out more by giving him real life experience of how losing weight works.

MuscleM4n · 09-18-2005, 02:04 PM

Good post Psch91

MWpro · 09-18-2005, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MuscleM4n

No, becuase the stomach fat is what is bothering the guy in the first place.

So just giving advice that target weightloss does not exist so the person doesn't end up doing 1000 sit-ups a day.

Read his question again. His question regards cardio for fat loss, not high reps for toning. Show me where he mentions doing 1,000 situps in his post.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psch91

Uhm, no? They are trying to help him out, even if he didnt ask for that particularly. Next month he will make a thread about not losing weight on his stomach, because he believes he can spot reduce. Those "illogal" people helped him out, while you on the other hand, called them out on it, and added nothing to the original question. They actually helped him out more by giving him real life experience of how losing weight works.

MuscleM4n · 09-18-2005, 03:34 PM

I don't really care what you think.

Why are you picking up on our spelling mistakes? To show us how clever you are?

the questions have been answered.

Lepa · 09-19-2005, 12:38 AM

If you want to burn fat and keep muscle loss to a minimum id suggest low intensity. If you just want to burn fat and dont have a problem with losing some muscle then higher intensity.

09-17-2005, 02:30 PM	#1
adamf4i Registered User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Kansas city,MO Posts: 41	do you burn more fat off the stomach doin slower longer running on like a treadmill or stairstepper like on the treadmill say 4.5 speed nice lil steady jog for say like 30 minutes is that gonna burn more fat then running a faster speed for 30 minutes cause i keep hearing that lower speed is burning more fat and faster speed is just cardio i dont get it ,sorry if this is dumb question but any advice i would appreciate , i cant exactly remmeber the speed of the stairmaster but its like level 7 would be slower walk up then like 11

09-17-2005, 02:39 PM	#2
CowPimp Fueled by Testosterone Moderator Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Silver Spring, MD Posts: 15,405	Lower intensity cardio is what optimizes fat burning during the activity itself. However, shorter intense cardio sessions can give you a really awesome metabolism boost afterwards. Either way is effective.
	The only time it's bad to feel the burn is when you're peeing... CowPimp Picks Up Heavy Shit MySpace YouTube Videos

09-17-2005, 02:40 PM	#3
LAM Gym ratt/Part-time pimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 7,384 Photos: 2	the higher the intensity of exercise the more glucose/glycogen utililized for energy during the training session and the more fat will be oxidized post exercise.
	Dumbest statement made in the Anabolic Zone for Nov TBD ----------------------------------------------------- What you talking about Willis ?

09-17-2005, 03:33 PM	#4
MuscleM4n Registered User Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: London Posts: 1,280 Photos: 9	'more fat off the stomach' is not possible Body fat is lost evenly throughout the body when you take in less calories than you need. Just that some people have a predeposition for adding it to different places. Last edited by MuscleM4n : 09-17-2005 at 03:47 PM.
	Age 19, Weight 132lbs , height 5'4", 8% bodyfat, 100% natural. Deadlift - 274lbs (NEW PB 9/8/2005) Squat - 274lbs (NEW PB 19/8/2005) Bench press - 154lbs Total - 702lbs @ 132lbs My Website Full Body Pictures 26/9/2005 My Journal! - Progress pictures 28/8/2005 Paint bodybuilder "Bodybuilding is a marathon not a sprint". Originally Posted by P-funk: "eat for size, train for strength".

09-17-2005, 03:51 PM	#5
The Monkey Man Magical Apelikemenace Elite Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: New Delhi, India Posts: 13,639 Photos: 34	What ever exercise you can do longer will burn more... But in general... The higher the intensity... the higher the burn -
	Have Problems?... Chances are its due to overpopulation Save The Oceans, Save the Planet, Save Your Family, Save Yourself!

09-18-2005, 11:14 AM	#6
morningtime00 Registered User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: ONTARIO CANADA Posts: 43 Photos: 3	lol i love how people think there is such a thing as "target weightloss" lol

09-18-2005, 02:04 PM	#12
MuscleM4n Registered User Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: London Posts: 1,280 Photos: 9	Good post Psch91
	Age 19, Weight 132lbs , height 5'4", 8% bodyfat, 100% natural. Deadlift - 274lbs (NEW PB 9/8/2005) Squat - 274lbs (NEW PB 19/8/2005) Bench press - 154lbs Total - 702lbs @ 132lbs My Website Full Body Pictures 26/9/2005 My Journal! - Progress pictures 28/8/2005 Paint bodybuilder "Bodybuilding is a marathon not a sprint". Originally Posted by P-funk: "eat for size, train for strength".

09-18-2005, 03:34 PM	#14
MuscleM4n Registered User Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: London Posts: 1,280 Photos: 9	I don't really care what you think. Why are you picking up on our spelling mistakes? To show us how clever you are? the questions have been answered. Last edited by MuscleM4n : 09-19-2005 at 01:54 AM.
	Age 19, Weight 132lbs , height 5'4", 8% bodyfat, 100% natural. Deadlift - 274lbs (NEW PB 9/8/2005) Squat - 274lbs (NEW PB 19/8/2005) Bench press - 154lbs Total - 702lbs @ 132lbs My Website Full Body Pictures 26/9/2005 My Journal! - Progress pictures 28/8/2005 Paint bodybuilder "Bodybuilding is a marathon not a sprint". Originally Posted by P-funk: "eat for size, train for strength".

09-19-2005, 12:38 AM	#15
Lepa Registered User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Brisbane Australia Posts: 42 Photos: 2	If you want to burn fat and keep muscle loss to a minimum id suggest low intensity. If you just want to burn fat and dont have a problem with losing some muscle then higher intensity.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Lose Bodyfat but gain mass?	Jason Da Bodiful	Training	25	01-10-2006 06:16 PM
Here is a good writing that some of you might enjoy!	Prince	Training	17	10-10-2005 12:49 PM
protein needs	Michelle	Diet & Nutrition	21	06-09-2004 07:46 PM
34 Ways to Lose Fat	Prince	Diet & Nutrition	22	06-16-2002 04:43 AM
Intensive cardio in Am while cutting?	Jenny	Training	19	04-22-2002 04:53 PM