IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum


Go Back   IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum > BodyBuilding & Fitness Forums > Training
Photo Gallery Register Members List Videos Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Training Learn proper form, techniques, & routines. Post questions about weight training as it relates to muscle building.

Sponsored by: AtLargeNutrition.com


Are Dips/Chin Ups better for your arms than any curling excersizes?


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-28-2005, 11:21 AM   #1
Registered User
 
CancerNV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 454

Are Dips/Chin Ups better for your arms than any curling excersizes?

BODYBUILDING SUPPLEMENTS
High Quality Supplements For Bodybuilders and Athletes. www.ironmaglabs.com
Why would someone at my gym say this? Could it be true?



CancerNV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 11:35 AM   #2
Canine club CEO
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: baja calif, Mexico
Posts: 6,933
Photos: 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by CancerNV
Why would someone at my gym say this? Could it be true?
Bar dips and chins are compound training exercises. I do believe compound exercises to be superior to isolation type exercises. So I say true but only if you continually add weight to the exercise.
Tough Old Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 11:44 AM   #3
Catabolic Idiot
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 151

got to do it heavy like tough said, 4-6 rep range...add weight to yourself if necessary. I believe this to be true and have seen it personally.

compound=better
benverner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 11:52 AM   #4
Registered User
 
CancerNV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 454

Im going to try it out. How often do you do these excersizes then? When do you put them in your routine? It seems like one should be with back and the other with chest?



CancerNV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 11:53 AM   #5
Fueled by Testosterone
Moderator
 
CowPimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 15,400

Oh boy, I can see where this thread is going...

Let's just say that your training regimen should be centered around compound exercises. In my opinion, isolation movements should mostly be used to bring up weak points or lagging body parts.



The only time it's bad to feel the burn is when you're peeing...

CowPimp Picks Up Heavy Shit

MySpace

YouTube Videos
CowPimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 12:34 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,544

Quote:
Originally Posted by benverner
got to do it heavy like tough said, 4-6 rep range...add weight to yourself if necessary. I believe this to be true and have seen it personally.

compound=better
For powerlifting yes
But for just BB or exercise 8-10 is better
TJ Cline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 12:39 PM   #7
Catabolic Idiot
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 151

what they said.
benverner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 12:52 PM   #8
Fueled by Testosterone
Moderator
 
CowPimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 15,400

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
For powerlifting yes
But for just BB or exercise 8-10 is better
I think 4-6 is a good range to include in bodybuilding routines sometimes as well. Training with weights in the 4-8RM range is great for functional hypertrophy.



The only time it's bad to feel the burn is when you're peeing...

CowPimp Picks Up Heavy Shit

MySpace

YouTube Videos
CowPimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 01:19 PM   #9
primeau
 
lnvanry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 2,904
Photos: 12

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
For powerlifting yes
But for just BB or exercise 8-10 is better
lnvanry is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 01:22 PM   #10
primeau
 
lnvanry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 2,904
Photos: 12

Quote:
Originally Posted by CancerNV
Why would someone at my gym say this? Could it be true?
IMO I try to take my arms out of those exercises.

On pullups I try to use pure back muscles to get up...no forearms or biceps or at least to a minimum

on dips I lean way foward and flare my elbows out to diminish my tri from the exercise. For me dips are a chest/front delt exercise. I never lock out at the top either b/c this is all tris at that point
lnvanry is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 01:31 PM   #11
Fueled by Testosterone
Moderator
 
CowPimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 15,400

Quote:
Originally Posted by lnvanry
IMO I try to take my arms out of those exercises.

On pullups I try to use pure back muscles to get up...no forearms or biceps or at least to a minimum

on dips I lean way foward and flare my elbows out to diminish my tri from the exercise. For me dips are a chest/front delt exercise. I never lock out at the top either b/c this is all tris at that point
Don't shortchange your range of motion for the sake of trying to reduce tricep stimulation. That makes no sense. What's the point?



The only time it's bad to feel the burn is when you're peeing...

CowPimp Picks Up Heavy Shit

MySpace

YouTube Videos
CowPimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 01:34 PM   #12
primeau
 
lnvanry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 2,904
Photos: 12

I shortchange the motion on a lot of things to only certain mucles groups on certain days...ex.

chest day I never lock out bench and dips...Its a chest day not a chest and tri day.

shoulders day I don't lock out on overhead presses...it's not shoulders and tris for me.

I save my tris for a high volume tri day. My volume is pretty crazy I posted it on another thread today titled "high volume workouts" or something like that..check it out Cow.

i'm curious of what you think. I like to discuss training w/ you.
lnvanry is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 01:40 PM   #13
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,544

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowPimp
I think 4-6 is a good range to include in bodybuilding routines sometimes as well. Training with weights in the 4-8RM range is great for functional hypertrophy.
If somebody is consistantly doing sets of 4 reps on biceps their is a 95% chance that person is an idiot.

Less than 6 reps is for power lifting/Olympic lifting only!!!
TJ Cline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 01:41 PM   #14
Fueled by Testosterone
Moderator
 
CowPimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 15,400

Quote:
Originally Posted by lnvanry
I shortchange the motion on a lot of things to only certain mucles groups on certain days...ex.

chest day I never lock out bench and dips...Its a chest day not a chest and tri day.

shoulders day I don't lock out on overhead presses...it's not shoulders and tris for me.
Everyone thinks of movements in body parts too much! You are using your triceps regardless. If you extend the elbow your triceps get used. The only thing you are doing is sacrificing strength at lockout for some silly notion that you can't hit a body part more than once per week. Also, you are neglecting your traps to some degree on overhead pressing because your scapula elevates when locking out overhead presses.

If you want to isolate a body part with some supplemental work then use an isolation exercise. Don't use limited range of motion compound movements...


Quote:
I save my tris for a high volume tri day. My volume is pretty crazy I posted it on another thread today titled "high volume workouts" or something like that..check it out Cow.

i'm curious of what you think. I like to discuss training w/ you.
If it's working for you, then my opinion of it is pretty meaningless. Nonetheless, I'll take a look for ya.



The only time it's bad to feel the burn is when you're peeing...

CowPimp Picks Up Heavy Shit

MySpace

YouTube Videos
CowPimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 01:44 PM   #15
Fueled by Testosterone
Moderator
 
CowPimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 15,400

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
Less than 6 reps is for power lifting/Olympic lifting only!!!
That is a ridiculous statement. All kinds of effective bodybuilding protocols call for using intensities higher than your 8RM. Improving neuromuscular efficiency has positive benefits on hypertrophy. Not to mention, fast-twitch B fibers don't get as much stimulation as they should unless you are conciously use compensatory acceleration on all your lifts. Even then, you are neglecting the other benefits of lifting heavy.



The only time it's bad to feel the burn is when you're peeing...

CowPimp Picks Up Heavy Shit

MySpace

YouTube Videos
CowPimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 01:56 PM   #16
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,544

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowPimp
That is a ridiculous statement. All kinds of effective bodybuilding protocols call for using intensities higher than your 8RM. Improving neuromuscular efficiency has positive benefits on hypertrophy. Not to mention, fast-twitch B fibers don't get as much stimulation as they should unless you are conciously use compensatory acceleration on all your lifts. Even then, you are neglecting the other benefits of lifting heavy.
Use the entire quote next time


Here it is in its entirety.
If somebody is consistently doing sets of 4 reps on biceps their is a 95% chance that person is an idiot.

Less than 6 reps is for power lifting/Olympic lifting only!!!




Dropping below 6 reps ( i.e. 1-5 reps) is of little benefit to bodybuilders or the casual lifter........it will however in most cases increase your risk of injury
TJ Cline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 02:15 PM   #17
Registered User
 
Nate K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,659
Photos: 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by CancerNV
Why would someone at my gym say this? Could it be true?
Yes it is true.
Nate K is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 02:37 PM   #18
Fueled by Testosterone
Moderator
 
CowPimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 15,400

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
Use the entire quote next time


Here it is in its entirety.
If somebody is consistently doing sets of 4 reps on biceps their is a 95% chance that person is an idiot.

Less than 6 reps is for power lifting/Olympic lifting only!!!
Although I hesitate to call the person an idiot, I think that doing sets purely of 4 repetitions for bicep isolation is not the best idea. That's why I only used the second sentence, which is nonsense.


Quote:
Dropping below 6 reps ( i.e. 1-5 reps) is of little benefit to bodybuilders or the casual lifter........it will however in most cases increase your risk of injury
Nonsense again! As long as you maintain proper form your chance of injury shouldn't rise appreciably.



The only time it's bad to feel the burn is when you're peeing...

CowPimp Picks Up Heavy Shit

MySpace

YouTube Videos
CowPimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 02:40 PM   #19
Registered User
 
kraziplaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 527
Photos: 1

my arms are my genetic pro(prob the only one) and i rarely hit them individually.. used to... doing heavy benching..heavy rowing seems to make them grow just fine
kraziplaya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 03:25 PM   #20
Registered User
 
mr_oo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 81

I agree with Cowpimp. For me personally 4-6 always sees some of the best mass gains. Anyway the increased strength you get from 4-6 means you can lift more effectivly at 8-10.



@ March 30
DEADLIFT - 210kg

Be a lamp unto yourselves... seek salvation alone in the truth – Buddha
mr_oo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 03:32 PM   #21
primeau
 
lnvanry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 2,904
Photos: 12

yeah but that mass is covered by a layer of fat good stuff
lnvanry is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 03:35 PM   #22
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,544

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowPimp
Although I hesitate to call the person an idiot, I think that doing sets purely of 4 repetitions for bicep isolation is not the best idea. That's why I only used the second sentence, which is nonsense.




Nonsense again! As long as you maintain proper form your chance of injury shouldn't rise appreciably.
I absolutely disagree with you.......to even think doing singles ( maxing out) or 3,4 reps is as safe as higher reps (6-12+) is just pure nonsense.
90% of the people in the gym are incapable of training with proper form when they max or do super low reps.....

In a perfect world???? I still say low or single reps are far more dangerous......esp with biceps and triceps....the muscles this thread is about!
TJ Cline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 06:13 PM   #23
Fueled by Testosterone
Moderator
 
CowPimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 15,400

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
I absolutely disagree with you.......to even think doing singles ( maxing out) or 3,4 reps is as safe as higher reps (6-12+) is just pure nonsense.
90% of the people in the gym are incapable of training with proper form when they max or do super low reps.....

In a perfect world???? I still say low or single reps are far more dangerous......esp with biceps and triceps....the muscles this thread is about!
I understand what you're saying. Most people don't pay enough attention to form or fixing weak points to improve it. However, like I said, if done properly, I don't think lifting heavy is inherently dangerous. Going into the world of heavy lifting does require gradual increases to ensure that you don't overdo it.



The only time it's bad to feel the burn is when you're peeing...

CowPimp Picks Up Heavy Shit

MySpace

YouTube Videos
CowPimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10 - Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
All logos, trademarks and content on this site are property of 2001-2008 by IronMagazine.com LLC - All Rights Reserved


Credit Cards | Problem Mortgage | Free Advertising | Life Insurance | Mortgage Calculator

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37