IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum


Go Back   IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum > BodyBuilding & Fitness Forums > Training
Photo Gallery Register Members List Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Training Learn proper form, techniques, & routines. Post questions about weight training as it relates to muscle building.

Sponsored by: BigBackGrips.com


Physics Question About Squats


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2005, 12:41 PM   #1
[][]---------[][]
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 47

Physics Question About Squats

This was mentioned once in this (Front Loaded Squats) thread:

If I am 6'6" tall and can squat 225 for reps, and my friend is 5"8" and can squat 365 for reps, how much more work is he doing than I am? I've heard comments like "Yeah, but look how far he has to move that weight", and not necessarily only during squats. Is there any truth in this?
Stretch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2005, 02:24 PM   #2
Patrick
Super Moderator
 
P-funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: AZ
Posts: 30,625

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stretch
This was mentioned once in this (Front Loaded Squats) thread:

If I am 6'6" tall and can squat 225 for reps, and my friend is 5"8" and can squat 365 for reps, how much more work is he doing than I am? I've heard comments like "Yeah, but look how far he has to move that weight", and not necessarily only during squats. Is there any truth in this?

you would have to measure your torso, more importantly the placement of the bar on your back (resistance arm) to your lower back (fulcrum) and then the length of your hamstring tendons and where they attaches at the tibia and fibula (force arm).

then you do the math with the weight you are lifting (resistance) where "f" is the force being applied (what you are measuring), ra= resistance arm, r= resistance (the weight lifted) and fa= force arm.

f x fa=r x ra

I think that is right. It is tough because somewhere in there you would have to account for the quad muscles extending the knee so they would also be in there as force arms.



http://pwtraining.blogspot.com/.....come and see what is on my mind!

Ivonne's Blog on Health and Wellness!

Optimum Sports Performance

"In the beginners mind there are many possibilities, in the experts there are few."
-Buddha's Little Instruction Book
P-funk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2005, 04:10 PM   #3
[][]---------[][]
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 47

So, because the distance from my knees to my hips is longer than most, I would have a longer force arm, right? So with a longer force arm, less force is need to overcome a given resistance (weight)?
Stretch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2005, 04:25 PM   #4
Patrick
Super Moderator
 
P-funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: AZ
Posts: 30,625

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stretch
So, because the distance from my knees to my hips is longer than most, I would have a longer force arm, right? So with a longer force arm, less force is need to overcome a given resistance (weight)?

It is more then that. it is basically a lever system. You have a force arm and a resistance arm both are seperated by a fulcrum, in this case the lower back which serves as the axis of rotation. It is a first class lever (like a see-saw). If you are to much in one direction (ie, longer toros or short muscle attachment) you don't have optimal force aplication.

Just plug numbers in....You are 6'6". So say you have a torso length of 30in. (bar to lower back) and a hamstring tendon attachment length of 5in. While your buddy at 5'8" has a torso length of 24in. (bar to lower back) and a hamstring attachment length of 5in also since we are talking about the tendon length from its start to its attachemnt point. You both go to lift 220lbs.

so for you
f= what we are trying to find out
RA= 30in
R= 220lbs
FA= 5in

f x 5 = 220 x 30
f x 5= 6600
f= 6600/5
f= 1320lbs force inches


your friend
f x 5= 220 x 24
f x 5= 5280
f= 5280/5
f= 1056lbs force inches.

You lifted 264 more lbs in force incehs then he did.



*disclaimer* I think I did this correctly but I am not 100% sure. I was not that great in physics. I know the equation is right but I am not 100% sure that I set up the proper numbers. At any rate you can see where I am going with it and someone that has studied physics more than I will be able to come up with a similiar answer. I will come back to this thread in a few years (after I work on my masters in kineseology...lol).



http://pwtraining.blogspot.com/.....come and see what is on my mind!

Ivonne's Blog on Health and Wellness!

Optimum Sports Performance

"In the beginners mind there are many possibilities, in the experts there are few."
-Buddha's Little Instruction Book
P-funk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
training theories - stop overtraining! Mifody Training 27 10-19-2005 10:07 PM
End of week squats WilliamB Training 0 04-26-2005 11:20 PM
Finnaly!, muscle iso in squats sawheet Training 1 09-05-2002 11:11 AM
Questions about squats CJMAJOR Training 14 03-05-2002 08:09 PM
Leg Press Vs Squats Maki Riddington Training 20 08-03-2001 11:52 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12 - Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
All logos, trademarks and content on this site are property of 2001-2008 by IronMagazine.com LLC - All Rights Reserved


Auto Loans | 0 Credit Cards | PC Memory | Nashville Tennessee Hotels | Cell Phones

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40