I have currently been using a 4 day split as my workout. It looks like this:
Monday: Chest Tri
Tuesday: Back Bi
Wednesday: Rest
Thursday: Traps Delts
Friday: Legs
Rest
Repeat
My diet hasn't been the best lately, being a college student and all, but once finals are over i'll be home and back to a good diet. I take a protein and multivitamin, and i'll get some creatine again soon. I have been doing some research and this Starr 5x5 looks interesting, something different. My question is, what workout is a better one for mass, obviously I can switch up my split a little, but I mean the 5x5 or a 4 day split. I'm looking for mass primarily, strength secondarily.
Legs:
Squats 5x5 (Alternate with deadlifts weekly)
Deadlifts 3x8 (Alternate with squats weekly)
Leg Extensions supersetted with Leg Curls 2x12 each
Calf work if you do it
Just some random crap off the top of my head. There is a lot of room to play around though.
The only time it's bad to feel the burn is when you're peeing...
So you feel the 4 day split would be better for mass? I do a normal mass workout....my back bi workout today looks like this.
Back Bi:
4x Pullup (can't get weighted yet, on a side note, any other exercise help to increase my pullup strength?)
4x Deadlift
4x Bentover Row
3x Dumbell row/t-bar
3x Barbell Curl
3x hammer curl
3x some other isolation for bi's
Pull up negatives will greatly improve pull up strength. Yates rows work the upper back quite well, and can probably have reasonable carryover to the pull ups as well. I'm not 100% on the yates rows, but my pull ups dramatically increased with a combination of negatives, yates rows and weight loss. The rows may have had nothing to do with it, so wait until someone confirms or refutes this to act upon it.
Push yourself. Enjoy yourself. Be yourself.
Knowledge is power. Obsessed with functional strength. Journal
DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.