IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum


Go Back   IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum > BodyBuilding & Fitness Forums > Training
Photo Gallery Register Members List Videos Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Training Learn proper form, techniques, & routines. Post questions about weight training as it relates to muscle building.

Sponsored by: BigBackGrips.com


Advice on New program


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-14-2006, 04:18 PM   #1
Registered User
 
ironman512's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 310
Photos: 122

Advice on New program

BODYBUILDING SUPPLEMENTS
High Quality Supplements For Bodybuilders and Athletes. www.ironmaglabs.com
I was looking around trying to get a new routine and i thionk i found one. Tell we what you all think of the routine

Day 1(Bench n shoulders)
Bench press 5x5 @ 75% max
skull crushers 4x10
3 board press 1x5 1x3 1x3 1x3
barbell press behind neck 4x10

Day 2(Squats, upper back n core)
Squats 5x5 @ 75%
crucifix lunges 4x10
Lat pulldowns 4x10
wieghted situps 100 total reps

Day3 off

Day 4(Light bench and shoulders)
Bench press 5x2 @ 80% (this doesnt look like itl be light lol)
side raises 4x10
incline dumbell press 4x10
military press 3x8

Day5(deadlifts upper back n core)
deald lifts 5x5 @ 75%
rack pulls 1x2 1x2 1x1 1x1
DB rows 4x10
100 total situps

day 6 off
day 7 off

the assitant exercises would change every week or more and the main lifts reps range and percentages change throughout the course of 14 weeks then a rets period
ironman512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 04:21 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,544

barbell press behind neck: drop these and do DB or military press..
TJ Cline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 04:33 PM   #3
Senior Member
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: .
Posts: 21,370
Photos: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
barbell press behind neck: drop these and do DB or military press..
I've been under the impression that behind the neck presses will tear the crap out of your shoulders. Any truth to that?



Quote:
Originally Posted by SamEaston View Post
Speaking of DOMS ... owww ... my ass ....
DOMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 07:13 PM   #4
Patrick
Super Moderator
 
P-funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: AZ
Posts: 30,341

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOMS
I've been under the impression that behind the neck presses will tear the crap out of your shoulders. Any truth to that?

defenitly not the safest thing. in general, lowering weight behind your neck can get ugly and pressing up from behind your neck can get really ugly if you let the bar drift back. I do some light behind the neck presses and moderate behind the neck jerks with a snatch grip for my olympic lifts but other then that, if you aren't trying to be a competitive olympic lifter there is no sense in going there.



http://pwtraining.blogspot.com/.....come and see what is on my mind!

http://ivonneberkowitz.blogspot.com/....check out Ivonne's new blog!

Optimum Sports Performance

"In the beginners mind there are many possibilities, in the experts there are few."
-Buddha's Little Instruction Book
P-funk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 07:45 PM   #5
Senior Member
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: .
Posts: 21,370
Photos: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-funk
defenitly not the safest thing. in general, lowering weight behind your neck can get ugly and pressing up from behind your neck can get really ugly if you let the bar drift back. I do some light behind the neck presses and moderate behind the neck jerks with a snatch grip for my olympic lifts but other then that, if you aren't trying to be a competitive olympic lifter there is no sense in going there.
Thanks for confirming that.

On a somewhat related note, is it true that leg extensions cause so much shear on the knees that they shouldn't be done?



Quote:
Originally Posted by SamEaston View Post
Speaking of DOMS ... owww ... my ass ....
DOMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 07:58 PM   #6
Patrick
Super Moderator
 
P-funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: AZ
Posts: 30,341

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOMS
Thanks for confirming that.

On a somewhat related note, is it true that leg extensions cause so much shear on the knees that they shouldn't be done?

defenitly! It is an open chain exercise meaning that the application of force is not straight down through the center of gravity. this is a problem with the knee because it is not developed for a movement where load is placed at the distal end in this manner. What happens is that the quad tendons get pulled tight and as they apply force the drive the patella back into the knee joint (a place that it doesn't want to go) creating shearing forces.



http://pwtraining.blogspot.com/.....come and see what is on my mind!

http://ivonneberkowitz.blogspot.com/....check out Ivonne's new blog!

Optimum Sports Performance

"In the beginners mind there are many possibilities, in the experts there are few."
-Buddha's Little Instruction Book
P-funk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 08:03 PM   #7
Senior Member
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: .
Posts: 21,370
Photos: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-funk
defenitly! It is an open chain exercise meaning that the application of force is not straight down through the center of gravity. this is a problem with the knee because it is not developed for a movement where load is placed at the distal end in this manner. What happens is that the quad tendons get pulled tight and as they apply force the drive the patella back into the knee joint (a place that it doesn't want to go) creating shearing forces.
So, just to be clear, I need to stop doing them?



Quote:
Originally Posted by SamEaston View Post
Speaking of DOMS ... owww ... my ass ....
DOMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 08:16 PM   #8
Pizza the Hut
Super Moderator
 
Mudge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 22,993
Photos: 1

There is no reason at all to do leg extentions in the first place.



Kinesiology Vote @ Top 25 Deads Comp Bench
Motivation Bench form MaxCalc Charles Poliquin
When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be. Lao-Tzu
I don't know any sources so don't ask - thanks
Mudge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 08:44 PM   #9
Senior Member
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: .
Posts: 21,370
Photos: 5

Why is that? Other than the (now) obvious shearing of the knees.



Quote:
Originally Posted by SamEaston View Post
Speaking of DOMS ... owww ... my ass ....
DOMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 12:01 AM   #10
Registered User
 
MWpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 874

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOMS
Why is that? Other than the (now) obvious shearing of the knees.
There are much better exercises, you should not have to resort to leg extensions. Squats, leg press, lunges, etc.
MWpro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 03:19 AM   #11
Patrick
Super Moderator
 
P-funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: AZ
Posts: 30,341

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOMS
Why is that? Other than the (now) obvious shearing of the knees.

you need to stop because of the shear force and that is it. Why would you want to do an exercises that is proven to be damaging to your body. There are much better quad dominant exercises....lunges, bulgarian squats, back squat, front squat, that will not only train the knee extensors in their proper biomechanical movement. Think about, when in life do you extend your knee with weight on the front of your calf? Never! The human body is made to work as a whole. Not single muscles at a time.



http://pwtraining.blogspot.com/.....come and see what is on my mind!

http://ivonneberkowitz.blogspot.com/....check out Ivonne's new blog!

Optimum Sports Performance

"In the beginners mind there are many possibilities, in the experts there are few."
-Buddha's Little Instruction Book
P-funk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 07:16 AM   #12
Senior Member
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: .
Posts: 21,370
Photos: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-funk
you need to stop because of the shear force and that is it. Why would you want to do an exercises that is proven to be damaging to your body. There are much better quad dominant exercises....lunges, bulgarian squats, back squat, front squat, that will not only train the knee extensors in their proper biomechanical movement. Think about, when in life do you extend your knee with weight on the front of your calf? Never! The human body is made to work as a whole. Not single muscles at a time.
Don't misunderstand me, I'll stop doing them to spare my knees. I'm already convinced of that. It just seemed that Mudge had another compelling reason not to do them and being the curious person that I am, I asked why. Thanks for answering my question.



Quote:
Originally Posted by SamEaston View Post
Speaking of DOMS ... owww ... my ass ....
DOMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 09:17 AM   #13
Moderator
Moderator
 
Dale Mabry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 13,771
Photos: 10

The bastardization of the leg extension is solely because they are an isolation exercise. I do them because my posterior kinetic chain is much stronger than my anterior at the knee(Don't know if the kinetic chain is referred to in this context). They are good for rehabbing and evening out strengths and weaknesses.

The major issue with the shear stress occurs at the bottom of the movement. When your leg is fully extended (Also happens to be where quadriceps force is greatest) there is less shear stress because the line of force is pulling the knee cap parallel to the femur, not down into it. The simple workaround is to set the leg extension up so that you miss the bottom 15 degrees or so of the movement, nearly all of the current leg extension machines have this ability, the one I use does.

Coincidentally, the greatest shear stress on the knee during a squat is at the bottom. Those who do ATG squats are actually putting as much shear stress on the knee at the bottom of the squat than they would at the bottom of the leg extension because the bottom of an ATG squat:

a)has the forces at the patellofemoral tendon directed down and into the femur.

b)typically is utilizing a much greater load.

Since the hips go into greater flexion during the squat, the forces are reduced, but the line of action is still into the femur. To even further lower the shear stress, a low bar position will put the hips and trunk into greater flexion. A wider stance also increases the shear stress.

So, since the squat is more functional, it is obviously better than doing leg extensions since they are an isolation exercise, but to eliminate a muscle imbalance, leg extensions are fine.



If sense were common, everyone would have it.

4/2007-Current 75th Ranked most popular image 1 spot behind Prince's bulge...
Dale Mabry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 09:32 AM   #14
Patrick
Super Moderator
 
P-funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: AZ
Posts: 30,341

yea, for some injury re-hab they are okay or if you have some sort of imbalance as Dale said. Getting proper position is key as he instructed, don't try and start with the leg extension to far in the back position.



http://pwtraining.blogspot.com/.....come and see what is on my mind!

http://ivonneberkowitz.blogspot.com/....check out Ivonne's new blog!

Optimum Sports Performance

"In the beginners mind there are many possibilities, in the experts there are few."
-Buddha's Little Instruction Book
P-funk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 09:35 AM   #15
Moderator
Moderator
 
Dale Mabry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 13,771
Photos: 10

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-funk
yea, for some injury re-hab they are okay or if you have some sort of imbalance as Dale said. Getting proper position is key as he instructed, don't try and start with the leg extension to far in the back position.

The problem with giving this advice is that now kenwood will think he can base a whole routine around the leg extension.



If sense were common, everyone would have it.

4/2007-Current 75th Ranked most popular image 1 spot behind Prince's bulge...
Dale Mabry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 09:46 AM   #16
Senior Member
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: .
Posts: 21,370
Photos: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Mabry
The problem with giving this advice is that now kenwood will think he can base a whole routine around the leg extension.
Only after asking 50 times.



Quote:
Originally Posted by SamEaston View Post
Speaking of DOMS ... owww ... my ass ....
DOMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 12:10 PM   #17
flawless
 
shiznit2169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,055
Photos: 3

Whenever i do squats, i always do them ATG. I also do front squats ATG. Other quad exercises will be lunges (DB and BB), step ups, leg press, and so forth. I only do leg ext. every once in a while, like once every 3-4 weeks. So if going ATG shears your knees more than a leg extension, would that be considered bad? I have never had knee problems or any kind of pain.



shiznit2169 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 12:17 PM   #18
Canine club CEO
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: baja calif, Mexico
Posts: 6,933
Photos: 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiznit2169
Whenever i do squats, i always do them ATG. would that be considered bad?
Only if eating a hotdog at the same time
Tough Old Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 12:56 PM   #19
Moderator
Moderator
 
Dale Mabry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 13,771
Photos: 10

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiznit2169
Whenever i do squats, i always do them ATG. I also do front squats ATG. Other quad exercises will be lunges (DB and BB), step ups, leg press, and so forth. I only do leg ext. every once in a while, like once every 3-4 weeks. So if going ATG shears your knees more than a leg extension, would that be considered bad? I have never had knee problems or any kind of pain.

No, you are fine. I go ATG myself, I was using it as a point.



If sense were common, everyone would have it.

4/2007-Current 75th Ranked most popular image 1 spot behind Prince's bulge...
Dale Mabry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 01:24 PM   #20
Lightweight, Ya Buddy!
Elite Member
 
Doublebase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 6,453

I never knew this. I do very heavy leg extentions too. I will stop doing them immediatley. I have seen people put them in programs and nobody has called them out on it so I thought they were ok to do.
Doublebase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2006, 10:25 AM   #21
Fueled by Testosterone
Moderator
 
CowPimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 15,405

I've read a couple of studies on the paletofemoral forces on the knee joint during a squat. From my understanding, the forces on the PCL raise dramatically once you go beyond about a 50 degree angle bend in the knees, but after about 70 degrees the forces don't raise too much more.

My point is that squatting the parallel and squatting below parallel aren't that big of a difference in terms of stress on the knee, but the difference between a half squat and a parallel squat it.

Thoughts?



The only time it's bad to feel the burn is when you're peeing...

CowPimp Picks Up Heavy Shit

MySpace

YouTube Videos
CowPimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2006, 11:06 AM   #22
Drop and give me 100
 
fUnc17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Jersey Shore BJJ
Posts: 1,862
Photos: 12

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowPimp
I've read a couple of studies on the paletofemoral forces on the knee joint during a squat. From my understanding, the forces on the PCL raise dramatically once you go beyond about a 50 degree angle bend in the knees, but after about 70 degrees the forces don't raise too much more.

My point is that squatting the parallel and squatting below parallel aren't that big of a difference in terms of stress on the knee, but the difference between a half squat and a parallel squat it.

Thoughts?
Think about it. You half squat, whats underneath you? Your knees and thats it. You parallel squat, whats underneath you? your entire center of gravity. The knee wasnt meant to bend the way a half squat requires it to. Your body was made to work as a whole just like P said, the half squat isolates and doesnt use as many muscles as much as a parallel or full squat does. Just my 2cents



fUnc17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2006, 11:06 AM   #23
Patrick
Super Moderator
 
P-funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: AZ
Posts: 30,341

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowPimp
I've read a couple of studies on the paletofemoral forces on the knee joint during a squat. From my understanding, the forces on the PCL raise dramatically once you go beyond about a 50 degree angle bend in the knees, but after about 70 degrees the forces don't raise too much more.

My point is that squatting the parallel and squatting below parallel aren't that big of a difference in terms of stress on the knee, but the difference between a half squat and a parallel squat it.

Thoughts?

can you post the studies?

Anyway, squatting below parallel, besides getting more glute activation, also has the benefit of more VMO activation which can enhance knee stability which is a plus in athletes (especially woman). Just thought I would throw that in there.



http://pwtraining.blogspot.com/.....come and see what is on my mind!

http://ivonneberkowitz.blogspot.com/....check out Ivonne's new blog!

Optimum Sports Performance

"In the beginners mind there are many possibilities, in the experts there are few."
-Buddha's Little Instruction Book
P-funk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2006, 11:07 AM   #24
Patrick
Super Moderator
 
P-funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: AZ
Posts: 30,341

Quote:
Originally Posted by fUnc17
Think about it. You half squat, whats underneath you? Your knees and thats it. You parallel squat, whats underneath you? your entire center of gravity. The knee wasnt meant to bend the way a half squat requires it to. Your body was made to work as a whole just like P said, the half squat isolates and doesnt use as many muscles as much as a parallel or full squat does. Just my 2cents

that is a good point. majority of the people half squatting don't even get that right!! They are really knee dominant and not sitting back (fear??) which is far worse then getting your hip extensors involed in the lift.



http://pwtraining.blogspot.com/.....come and see what is on my mind!

http://ivonneberkowitz.blogspot.com/....check out Ivonne's new blog!

Optimum Sports Performance

"In the beginners mind there are many possibilities, in the experts there are few."
-Buddha's Little Instruction Book
P-funk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2006, 11:50 AM   #25
Moderator
Moderator
 
Dale Mabry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 13,771
Photos: 10

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowPimp
I've read a couple of studies on the paletofemoral forces on the knee joint during a squat. From my understanding, the forces on the PCL raise dramatically once you go beyond about a 50 degree angle bend in the knees, but after about 70 degrees the forces don't raise too much more.

My point is that squatting the parallel and squatting below parallel aren't that big of a difference in terms of stress on the knee, but the difference between a half squat and a parallel squat it.