Primordialperformance.com


Quad or hamstring strength difference?

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    60
    Rep Points
    10

    Quad or hamstring strength difference?

    Do most people have a difference in strength between their quads and their hamstrings, or should they be even? I can always do more weight on the leg extensions versus hamstring curls. I deadlift about 100 lbs more than I squat though. Just curious really.

  2. #2
    Registered User

    katt's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Posts
    5,360
    Rep Points
    28016594

    I personally can do more weight w/my quads

  3. #3
    Functional Lifting = Life

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    3,541
    Rep Points
    872420

    Comparing a deadlift to a squat isn't really a comparison of quads to hams IMO. If you look at both movements, they're essentially the same exact thing with the only difference being direct or indirect loading of the spine. Indirect loading (deadlift) allows you to move more weight because the spine isn't being directly pressured by the weight. It's also important to look at the way in which the movements are performed. Are you comparing a parallel back squat to a GM or an ATG front squat or overhead squat to a GM? There will probably be huge variations by simply changing how the movement is done.

    That being said, a good comparison might be between deadlifts and SLDLs or squats and GMs. In other words, compare two exercises that have similar loading but different main movers (as much as we hate to think of movements as working muscles, they still do).

    I can SLDL about 320, deadlift about 100 more. Whether this is 'normal' or what it 'should' be I have no idea.
    Push yourself. Enjoy yourself. Be yourself.
    Knowledge is power. Obsessed with functional strength. Journal

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    60
    Rep Points
    10

    Thanks everyone. I understand the differences between the DL and Squat but the SLDL and GM comparison is an interesting way of approaching it.

    I was just curious as to the potential ability of force from the two muscle groups, quads and hams. i.e., all other factors being moot, does the quadriceps or the hamstring have more force potential. (If that makes any sense)

  5. #5
    Functional Lifting = Life

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    3,541
    Rep Points
    872420

    Quote Originally Posted by snoogans
    Thanks everyone. I understand the differences between the DL and Squat but the SLDL and GM comparison is an interesting way of approaching it.

    I was just curious as to the potential ability of force from the two muscle groups, quads and hams. i.e., all other factors being moot, does the quadriceps or the hamstring have more force potential. (If that makes any sense)
    I do realize what you're asking but I don't have an answer to that question. I know it's been discussed before and I think CowPimp came to the rescue with an answer (but I can't remember what it was). Obviously if you train one more than the other, the one with more training will have more potential, but I know you're asking about a situation in which both have the same (maybe no) training. I would guess that the quads can produce more force but, again, I'm really not sure.
    Push yourself. Enjoy yourself. Be yourself.
    Knowledge is power. Obsessed with functional strength. Journal

  6. #6
    Fueled by Testosterone
    MODERATOR

    CowPimp's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Silver Spring, MD
    Posts
    16,086
    Rep Points
    6502699

    Quote Originally Posted by Squaggleboggin
    Comparing a deadlift to a squat isn't really a comparison of quads to hams IMO. If you look at both movements, they're essentially the same exact thing with the only difference being direct or indirect loading of the spine. Indirect loading (deadlift) allows you to move more weight because the spine isn't being directly pressured by the weight. It's also important to look at the way in which the movements are performed. Are you comparing a parallel back squat to a GM or an ATG front squat or overhead squat to a GM? There will probably be huge variations by simply changing how the movement is done.

    That being said, a good comparison might be between deadlifts and SLDLs or squats and GMs. In other words, compare two exercises that have similar loading but different main movers (as much as we hate to think of movements as working muscles, they still do).

    I can SLDL about 320, deadlift about 100 more. Whether this is 'normal' or what it 'should' be I have no idea.
    Actually squaggle, there is a more significant difference between the squat and deadlift than you have mentioned here. You see, when you deadlift, your center of gravity is much further forward. That is, the center of gravity is moved further away from the hips and more toward the knees. So, there is very little torque acting on the knee joint (Somewhat limiting quadricep activation) and a lot more torque on the hip joint (Engaging the posterior chain to a much greater degree.

    Of course, on top of all of this, the levers and biomechanics involved in each lift are different. However, I would venture to say that most raw lifters can deadlift more than they squat. At the same time, you must also consider that the ROM is greater on a squat than a deadlift.
    The only time it's bad to feel the burn is when you're peeing...

    CowPimp Chews Cud - My Journal
    1RM Videos

  7. #7
    Functional Lifting = Life

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    3,541
    Rep Points
    872420

    Quote Originally Posted by CowPimp
    Actually squaggle, there is a more significant difference between the squat and deadlift than you have mentioned here. You see, when you deadlift, your center of gravity is much further forward. That is, the center of gravity is moved further away from the hips and more toward the knees. So, there is very little torque acting on the knee joint (Somewhat limiting quadricep activation) and a lot more torque on the hip joint (Engaging the posterior chain to a much greater degree.

    Of course, on top of all of this, the levers and biomechanics involved in each lift are different. However, I would venture to say that most raw lifters can deadlift more than they squat. At the same time, you must also consider that the ROM is greater on a squat than a deadlift.
    I knew that couldn't be the only difference; I just hoped that what I posted was correct haha. Thanks for expatiating, CP.
    Push yourself. Enjoy yourself. Be yourself.
    Knowledge is power. Obsessed with functional strength. Journal

Similar Threads

  1. Difference in Arm Strength
    By Kyle2886 in forum Training
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-04-2008, 09:23 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-05-2007, 08:59 PM
  3. Quad/hamstring proportions
    By Sef in forum Training
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-12-2006, 09:39 AM
  4. Strength Difference between Barbells and Dumbells
    By eskimo515 in forum Training
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-23-2003, 08:17 PM
  5. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-29-2003, 01:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.