split ideas...

assassin · 05-08-2006, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seanp156

What do you mean by this? A movement based split is no more difficult to lay out or execute than a bodypart split is.

it is ....for any body going to the gym for doing chest+tri for example is much easier than for doing certain exercises

fUnc17 · 05-08-2006, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by assassin

because it's easier to do ,, u don't have to balance ur whole cycle or make a previous plan ..every body part has it's own session,alsono body wants to plan for every movement he makes ,,wich moscles are being worked

Actually it is the exact opposite. It is easier to create a program based on movements rather than bodyparts. When you create a program based on bodyparts you run into a shit load of complications.. you become unbalanced. Be smart, train movements.

assassin · 05-08-2006, 11:18 AM

i do ...but i am saying what ppl do think

Seanp156 · 05-08-2006, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by assassin

i do ...but i am saying what ppl do think

What "people think" isn't necessary what's correct... Like Func said, training movements is much more simple overall than bodypart splits.

For someone going to the gym doing chest+tri exercises, it would be much easier for them to do something like two horizontal presses and two vertical presses.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-08-2006, 11:18 AM	#33
assassin Registered User Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: egypt/cairo Posts: 2,150	i do ...but i am saying what ppl do think