Hey Mick -- sorry if you took offense to my post or somehow got the idea that I was gunning for you.Originally posted by mick01
Are you addressing me?
Is a mid 400 squat/dead supposed to be impressive?
Heavy is relative.
If a belt were not important then why would ALL the top power lifters and strong men wear a belt????
Mick
Oh well. I was just adding my two cents given everyone else's uniform belief that belts are necessary, at least on some level. Personally, I don't think they are. I used to use a belt but dropped it a long time ago.
I have found, and you can disagree all you want, that if you use proper form, a belt is not necessary -- i.e., you will not hurt yourself w/o a belt. Will it help you lift a bit heavier? Probably a bit, but that doesn't mean the heavier weight will help you build muscle or increase your strength.
I wasn't trying to impress anyone, just trying to make the point that heavy weights can be used w/o a belt. And yes heavy is relative, and yes those weights are heavy for me (3-5 reps).
"If a belt were not important then why would ALL the top power lifters and strong men wear a belt????"
Why? The answer is quite simple actually. Because as you said, the use of a belt increases intramuscular pressure on the abdomin wall. This permits you to lift slightly heavier weights. Also, on an extreme level it may help prevent injury. If a powerlifter could increase a lift by even 5 or 10 pounds, he'd wear a belt --- voila! Same reason they use knee wraps (which can prevent injury if you have bad knees) and a squat shirt. Do a squat shirt help prevent injury? Why don't we all use them?
My reaction is simply one to the general notion that belts are necessary and, often, taken to the extreme as seen by those who use them for bench, etc.



Reply With Quote



