which would work better?

eemooof · 08-02-2006, 10:03 PM

What would work better for bulking up faster?

upper/lower/rest/upper/lower
or
doing a couple muscle groups a day with a rest once every muscle group has been worked

PWGriffin · 08-03-2006, 07:38 AM

bulking has more to do with diet.

But I like upper/lower splits more than body part splits.

**Gazhole** · 08-03-2006, 09:27 AM

Eating a lot will bulk you up, and body part routines arent very good IMO. Too much oppertunity to overtrain.

Go with Upper/Lower and eateateat.

**CowPimp** · 08-03-2006, 12:25 PM

As already said, both can be effective with a good diet. However, I much prefer higher frequency programs. Theoretically, higher frequency programs should yield better results, and thus far empirically I am finding this to be true as well; a lot of people on these boards have had good success using higher frequency programs.

08-02-2006, 10:03 PM	#1
eemooof Registered User Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 10	which would work better? What would work better for bulking up faster? upper/lower/rest/upper/lower or doing a couple muscle groups a day with a rest once every muscle group has been worked
eemooof Registered User Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 10

08-03-2006, 12:25 PM	#4
CowPimp Fueled by Testosterone Moderator Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Silver Spring, MD Posts: 15,405	As already said, both can be effective with a good diet. However, I much prefer higher frequency programs. Theoretically, higher frequency programs should yield better results, and thus far empirically I am finding this to be true as well; a lot of people on these boards have had good success using higher frequency programs.
	The only time it's bad to feel the burn is when you're peeing... CowPimp Picks Up Heavy Shit MySpace YouTube Videos

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode