Primordialperformance.com


Bent over rows

Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Bent over rows

  1. #1
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4
    Rep Points
    10

    Bent over rows

    Are bent over rows using dumbells as effective as they are using barbells?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    Doublebase's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    8,299
    Rep Points
    76475741


    I've always used a barbell. I'd imagine that the barbell would implement more use of other muscles to help stablelize the movement.

  3. #3
    Functional Lifting = Life

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    3,541
    Rep Points
    872420

    Quote Originally Posted by Doublebase View Post
    I've always used a barbell. I'd imagine that the barbell would implement more use of other muscles to help stablelize the movement.
    Wouldn't it be just the opposite due to the need to control two separate units of weight as opposed to a single unit?
    Push yourself. Enjoy yourself. Be yourself.
    Knowledge is power. Obsessed with functional strength. Journal

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    Doublebase's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    8,299
    Rep Points
    76475741


    Quote Originally Posted by Squaggleboggin View Post
    Wouldn't it be just the opposite due to the need to control two separate units of weight as opposed to a single unit?
    That makes sense. I was just thinking the barbell is heavier but that really is irrelevent.

  5. #5
    SHRUG LIKE YOU MEAN IT
    MODERATOR

    Gazhole's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    11,055
    Rep Points
    177740615


    I use dumbells at the moment and it feels pretty much the same in terms of difficulty, and gives the same results as using a barbell.

    If theres any differences theyre so small its not worth worrying about. As long as good form is kept, and you use full ROM it shouldnt be an issue.
    http://www.getlifting.info

    This may hurt a little... - Training Journal 2012

    Disclaimer: All health, fitness, diet, nutrition, anabolic steroid & supplement information posted here is intended for educational and informational purposes only, and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice from a medical doctor. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. If you choose to use AAS it's your responsibility to know the laws of the country that you live in. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website.

  6. #6
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    237
    Rep Points
    10

    That's funny this post came up, because I just did Bent over rows with Dumbells last night and really liked it. I like it because you can pull them back a little further with out the bar hitting your stomach or chest. Not too mention the bar possibly catching your knees (depending on your structure), and I felt a little more stable because of the center of gravity. Whatever, just my thoughts.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    assassin's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    egypt/cairo
    Posts
    2,355
    Rep Points
    2796119

    byt the way that was a good thread .. i'll try db bent over rows as soon as i could ...

  8. #8
    Metrosexual
    ELITE MEMBER

    DOMS's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    In a van, down by the river...
    Posts
    28,876
    Rep Points
    924474111


    Quote Originally Posted by Doublebase View Post
    That makes sense. I was just thinking the barbell is heavier but that really is irrelevent.
    No, that's not irrelevant. That's the trade of between barbells and dumbbells. Barbells allow you to use more weight and dumbbells recruit more muscle (in the form of stabilizer muscles).
    So many cries of inequality stem from one of group
    of people doing little or nothing and then bitching
    about another group that actually does something
    to improve their lives.

  9. #9
    Light weight!

    StanUk's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    In a galaxy far far away
    Posts
    705
    Rep Points
    1114910

    I've always done them with dumbbells up until last week when I switched to barbells, just to change things up a little bit really.

  10. #10
    Thats Dr. Keke to you!
    ELITE MEMBER

    KelJu's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    In my imagination.
    Posts
    13,701
    Rep Points
    433491349


    I cheat myself by only using T-Bar rows. I really need to start using dumbells for rows.
    “I used to do drugs. I still do drugs. But I used to, too.”

  11. #11
    I am Rollo Tomassee..
    ELITE MEMBER

    AKIRA's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Outside the box
    Posts
    10,132
    Rep Points
    62697268


    Quote Originally Posted by Squaggleboggin View Post
    Wouldn't it be just the opposite due to the need to control two separate units of weight as opposed to a single unit?
    Perhaps not. While one arm is working, the other is holding you up. During barbell rows, both arms are working, so your core is stabilizing alone.


    As far as the thread goes, I like DBs more than Barbells and I have never known why. Oh it gets worse. I like Yates rows over Barbell Rows, but not over DB rows. However, I know DBs have their limits in their own weight, so barbells would have to be used eventually.
    6' 217lbs (10/18)
    Bench 365 (12/3)
    Weighted Pullups 80lbs 3x3 (3/19)
    Squat 370
    Deadlift after herniation 385lbs 3x3 (3/17)
    NASM certified 2/06
    Journal

Similar Threads

  1. T-Bar Rows v.s. Bent-Over Barbell Rows
    By Phineas in forum Training
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-29-2009, 09:24 PM
  2. bent over rows
    By the_leprechaun in forum Training
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-10-2006, 10:05 AM
  3. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-18-2006, 02:55 PM
  4. Bent rows.
    By njc in forum Training
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 04-06-2005, 08:13 AM
  5. Bent over rows
    By Squaggleboggin in forum Training
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-22-2004, 08:31 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.