IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum


Go Back   IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum > BodyBuilding & Fitness Forums > Training
Photo Gallery Register Members List Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Training Learn proper form, techniques, & routines. Post questions about weight training as it relates to muscle building.

Sponsored by: BigBackGrips.com


anyone think bonds couldve grown w/o steroids?


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-16-2007, 03:12 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 73

anyone think bonds couldve grown w/o steroids?

i mean seriously, if hes working out everyday, isnt he going to get bigger? so its possible he was just taking protein or something... kuz i mean thats 10 years of solid lifting, prolly more.

wouldnt it make sense that he gets significantly bigger even w.o steroids?

i know he had that drug test recently, but wouldnt it have been possible to get that big without banned substances?



yuppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 03:13 PM   #2
Señor Member
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Stuart, FL
Posts: 7,261

View Member's Myspace Profile
Quote:
Originally Posted by yuppy View Post
i mean seriously, if hes working out everyday, isnt he going to get bigger? so its possible he was just taking protein or something... kuz i mean thats 10 years of solid lifting, prolly more.

wouldnt it make sense that he gets significantly bigger even w.o steroids?

i know he had that drug test recently, but wouldnt it have been possible to get that big without banned substances?
10 years of solid lifting yes. A few months each year in the offseason over those 10 years? No.



ReproMan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 03:16 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 73

dont you think itd be a year round thing if you were a pro athlete?



yuppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 03:18 PM   #4
Metrosexual
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a van, down by the river...
Posts: 21,728
Photos: 6

Do you think maybe that at age 22 you shouldn't be into steroids?



I never lie because I don't fear anyone. You only lie when you're afraid.—John Gotti
DOMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 03:22 PM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 73

im not, i just was wondeirng what you guys thought about bonds



yuppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 03:23 PM   #6
My Role Model
Moderator
 
IainDaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 15,945

Here is a quote from a discussion in the sports forum. Take a look at his stats.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IainDaniel View Post
I voted no, clearly Bonds was a phenomenal player before steriod use. But I do understand the reasoning for considering the Asterick.

Take a look at his stats pre 2000 and post 2000 quite a remarable difference

http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/mlb/st...188&statType=1

Pre 2000 Avg HR per Season 32
Post 200 Avg HR per Season 52

Pre OB% 407
Post OB% 535

Pre Slug% 561
Post Slug% 611

Pre Bat avg .288
Post Bat avg .341

Obviously Bonds has quite a remarkable improvement to his preformance since 2000, in which it would seem quite obvious Steriods have enhanced his natural abilities. Let alone the Fact that he should be on the down side of his career not the upswing at the age of 40.

It is foolish to think that steriods have not helped him get the single season record, nor more than likely the Career HR record. No doubt he has amazing Hand-eye coordination, why else would he be in the major leagues? Hitting a ball is a matter of hundreths of second for reaction time. Increased strenght allows one to get the back through the hitting area at a quicker rate, giving Bonds an opportunity to make better contact with the ball.

However, I voted no, because there are always going to be circumstances that could have impacted ones performance. He is a great athlete and nothing could take away from that, steroids or no steroids.
What happened shortly before he had this remarkable increase.... Oh yeah Mcguire and Sosa had the spotlight with there homerun spectacular. Bonds wanted the spotlight as well. He is a selfish player, and is only concerned with himself.

Your performance just doesn't increase like that, especially when you consider his age.



Obstacles don't have to stop you. If you run into a wall, don't turn around and give up. Figure out how to climb it, go through it, or work around it.

Michael Jordan
IainDaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 03:26 PM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 73

didnt jordan get better w/age? (until he retired)



yuppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 03:29 PM   #8
My Role Model
Moderator
 
IainDaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 15,945

no his numbers decreased as he got older.

And this isn't just an increase. It is a remarkable increase starting at the age of 36 which is unheard of in baseball



Obstacles don't have to stop you. If you run into a wall, don't turn around and give up. Figure out how to climb it, go through it, or work around it.

Michael Jordan
IainDaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 03:31 PM   #9
Light weight!
 
StanUk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In a galaxy far far away
Posts: 679
Photos: 1

Apparently theres been a book written about it.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...rpt/index.html
StanUk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2007, 01:14 AM   #10
Registered User
 
NordicNacho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,418
Photos: 18

He was a great player before he did what he had to do to compete with Mcguire and Sosa. And it payed off he's made a fortune.



NordicNacho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2007, 10:37 AM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 15

Quote:
Originally Posted by NordicNacho View Post
He was a great player before he did what he had to do to compete with Mcguire and Sosa. And it payed off he's made a fortune.
See, Here's the thing with Bonds. He was on track to be a future Hall of Famer even before the 'roids, amphetamines, etc. I still think he will get in based on his previous years performance levels. Mcguire and Sosa on the other hand are screwed. Can't see Mcguire ever getting in. To answer the original question, at his age, he couldn't have put that body together, that fast, without the juice.
nero36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12 - Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
All logos, trademarks and content on this site are property of 2001-2008 by IronMagazine.com LLC - All Rights Reserved


Ken follet | Short Bowel Syndrome | Free Advertising | Debt Consolidation | Remortgaging

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40