Speed reps article for discussion

buening · 03-25-2008, 12:55 PM

TESTOSTERONE NATION - The Secret to Motor Unit Recruitment

Thought I would post this and get some opinions or a discussion going on this. Chad Waterbury is among the elite trainers and has some pretty cutting edge stuff. I know speed reps isn't exactly breaking news. What are your thoughts and opinions on this topic of performing the eccentric portion of the lift as fast as possible and stopping the set once the rep speed slows. Has anyone tried this before and if so, what were the results? I am not some newbie posting a question about squat rack barbell curls, so please keep the discussion beneficial and educated.

I feel this would be beneficial to athletes that require power on demand or even powerlifters, but I'm not sure if this would be most beneficial to those just wanting to put on mass. He claims it is for mass as well. This goes against the rules of TOT (time under tension). This may be a critical item to use to break through a plateau, if anything.

While there is always the crowd that stick to the old school rules of lifting, I enjoy reading some of the articles by the top guys like Waterbury, Poloquin, Thibaudeau, Ian King, Dan John, and even the latest nutrition stuff by Dr. John Berardi. While I normally stick to the old school rules, knowledge is power

buening · 03-25-2008, 01:11 PM

Another article that is on the same topic TESTOSTERONE NATION - What Speed of Movement Should I Use?

Good couple paragraphs on Stretch Shortening Cycle

Witchblade · 03-25-2008, 02:02 PM

I think the fatal flaw in Chad's reasoning is that muscle fiber activation is solely responsible for growth. Firstly, you needn't just activate muscle fibers, you need to fatigue the fibers. Secondly, there's a lot more to hypertrophy than muscle fibers.

I don't like much of his work.

oneovercabin · 03-27-2008, 06:25 PM

I think this is a good idea if you're trying to get stronger.

Think about it... You're recruiting those motor units without building up excess amounts of lactic acid which will fatigue your muscles. Not to mention, doing speed reps will keep the intensity of your workouts high.

I think it's a decent idea depending on your goals. If you want mass though, you need TUT.

Irons77 · 03-27-2008, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oneovercabin

I think it's a decent idea depending on your goals. If you want mass though, you need TUT.

agree

03-25-2008, 12:55 PM	#1
buening Registered User Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Decatur, IL Posts: 137	Speed reps article for discussion BODYBUILDING SUPPLEMENTS High Quality Supplements For Bodybuilders and Athletes. www.ironmaglabs.com TESTOSTERONE NATION - The Secret to Motor Unit Recruitment Thought I would post this and get some opinions or a discussion going on this. Chad Waterbury is among the elite trainers and has some pretty cutting edge stuff. I know speed reps isn't exactly breaking news. What are your thoughts and opinions on this topic of performing the eccentric portion of the lift as fast as possible and stopping the set once the rep speed slows. Has anyone tried this before and if so, what were the results? I am not some newbie posting a question about squat rack barbell curls, so please keep the discussion beneficial and educated. I feel this would be beneficial to athletes that require power on demand or even powerlifters, but I'm not sure if this would be most beneficial to those just wanting to put on mass. He claims it is for mass as well. This goes against the rules of TOT (time under tension). This may be a critical item to use to break through a plateau, if anything. While there is always the crowd that stick to the old school rules of lifting, I enjoy reading some of the articles by the top guys like Waterbury, Poloquin, Thibaudeau, Ian King, Dan John, and even the latest nutrition stuff by Dr. John Berardi. While I normally stick to the old school rules, knowledge is power Last edited by buening : 03-25-2008 at 01:05 PM.

03-25-2008, 02:02 PM	#3
Witchblade Succinct Elite Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Holland Posts: 3,919	I think the fatal flaw in Chad's reasoning is that muscle fiber activation is solely responsible for growth. Firstly, you needn't just activate muscle fibers, you need to fatigue the fibers. Secondly, there's a lot more to hypertrophy than muscle fibers. I don't like much of his work.
	My Journal My Linkdump [LSFW] IM Official FAQ [WORK IN PROGRESS]

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

03-25-2008, 01:11 PM	#2
buening Registered User Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Decatur, IL Posts: 137	Another article that is on the same topic TESTOSTERONE NATION - What Speed of Movement Should I Use? Good couple paragraphs on Stretch Shortening Cycle

03-27-2008, 06:25 PM	#4
oneovercabin Registered User Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 82 Blog Entries: 2	I think this is a good idea if you're trying to get stronger. Think about it... You're recruiting those motor units without building up excess amounts of lactic acid which will fatigue your muscles. Not to mention, doing speed reps will keep the intensity of your workouts high. I think it's a decent idea depending on your goals. If you want mass though, you need TUT.