![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Photo Gallery | Register | Members List | Blogs | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Training Learn proper form, techniques, & routines. Post questions about weight training as it relates to muscle building.
Sponsored by: BigBackGrips.com |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 |
|
Member
Elite Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Delaware
Posts: 272
|
Getting back to the original topic:
Lately I've been using the smith machine for front and roman squats. I hate the machine for back squats but have found I can get greater ROM really streching out the quads with no stress on my joints. I usually do these after back squats and before leg extensions or leg presses. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Succinct
Elite Member
|
Quote:
A belt is basically a substitute for a core that can't do the job on its own or for situations when you can't afford the risk (powerlifting). A belt also increases blood pressure significantly. In short, you were right. Don't listen to the argumentless opinions of metallibanger and the like. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Bioidentical Bodybuilder
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: .
Posts: 2,513
|
Thanks Witchblade. I'm pretty careful with my back - I've had problems with it my whole life and I've done much to strengthen my core: unbelted squats, deads, rows... also heavy weighted ab work a few times a week - and of course the usual add-ons that hit core: chins, sprints, accessory work performed standing instead of sitting wherever possible, that sort of thing. I'm interested to see how I fare with a belt for some very heavy ME stuff this fall, but that's all I'll use it for. Besides, from what I understand, a properly-adjusted belt doesn't exactly feel very good - not something you'd want to leave on!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Gender: MALE
Elite Member
|
I actually had to stop mid-set the other day because I started laughing at a guy doing curls with horrible form while wearing a belt. Good thing I saw it in the mirror so I wasn't facing him though
![]() Made me think of that "Don't be that guy" video posted somewhere on here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Bioidentical Bodybuilder
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: .
Posts: 2,513
|
That's right - Arnold's training techniques to this day continue to represent the state of the art of strength and conditioning.
Enjoy "arm day" everybody... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: virgina USA
Posts: 23
|
that right metallibanger i have a 850lb deadlift from the floor i am i weight around 320lb i have a 540 bench raw and 1000lb squat parrel i am a pro strongman been training for about 15 years so i don't like to brag because it brings bad carma but you act like you never heard of that but i really can do so i have been compeating for about 3 years now so that is what i do for a living and love every min of it so lift hard and lift big
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
I am Rollo Tomassee..
Elite Member
|
Quote:
Dont forget, in those days, there were hardly any muscular guys at all. Now, we are still a rare breed, but we arent as scarce. But...heh, putting up a pic of Arnold or ANYONE doing a barbel curl with a belt isnt going to help your point at all. |
|
|
6' 209lbs (8/16)
Bench 360 (11/29) Weighted Pullups 80lbs 3x3 (3/19) Squat 370 Deadlift after herniation 385lbs 3x3 (3/17) NASM certified 2/06 Journal |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Bioidentical Bodybuilder
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: .
Posts: 2,513
|
He looked great, don't get me wrong - his upper body and tiny waist were, in a word, breathtaking. But his legs were small and he knew it - they were his worst part. In peak condition, in a modern-day competition, he'd be hard-pressed to make top 5 because of this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
Registered User
|
My bad
![]() Quote:
![]() Well, he isn't exactly known for having a tiny waist, and we're not talking about his legs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Bioidentical Bodybuilder
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: .
Posts: 2,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: virgina USA
Posts: 23
|
not trying to be an ass metallbanger so that is cool alot of people don't beleave me when i tell them people stop and watch me do it because it is just amazing or something i leg press around 1800lb and everone in gym watches that that is just amazing but prettey cool to have people just in amzament
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Senior Member
Elite Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Bioidentical Bodybuilder
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: .
Posts: 2,513
|
That's Zed Zed Top
- The Canadian. |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Senior Member
Elite Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Senior Member
Elite Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Amor Fati
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,798
|
Such a stupid argument. Arnold did curls with a belt so its good. Ad hominems are logical fallacies there big guy. Arnold trained in the 60's and 70's, they didn't know shit back then. 1970 was when they first figured out that women orgasm from clitoral stimulation and not vaginal penetration (1970: Information and Much More from Answers.com). If you think that our knowledge of nature hasn't increased exponentially in the past 40 years then you have bigger problems than doing curls in the squat rack with a loose weight belt on.
And although there is no way to prove this, but give anyone the same circumstances that Arnold had (his genetics, training, eating and tanning all day, the same amount of juice etc) except give him a modern day coach who has extensive knowledge of sports physiology, like a P-funk for training and a Mudge for juicing for example, and Arnold will be a twig compared to the absolute monster that will arise out of our hypothetical subject. |
|
"...we have to remember that training is a complicated dance of stimuli and response. Our goal is to understand how to manipulate the stimuli in order to evoke the responses we desire." -Nathan J. Polenchek
|
|
|
|
|