| You are Unregistered, please register to gain Full access. | 
|
| You are Unregistered, please register to gain Full access. |
|
 |
 |
 |
| Supplement Store | Forums | Main Site | News Blog | Photos | eBooks |
|
|||||||
| Photo Gallery | Register | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Training Learn proper form, techniques, & routines. Post questions about weight training as it relates to muscle building.
Sponsored by: LG Sciences |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
01-01-2009, 08:13 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 120
|
out of curiosity, why am I stronger on a free-weight squat than on the Smith Machine?
Only two leg workouts ago I switched to free weight squats (yes, I know...took a while...I was just paranoid that I'd throw out my back). Anyway, I was really shocked to find out that, not only was my form now perfect (I was never quite right on the Smith), but I'm lifting more, and feeling less fatigued after.
I found this strange because I've always thought (and found from my shift three months ago from machines to free weights) that you're generally not as strong on free weights as on machines. Might this be because the Smith Machine limits you're movement, and you can't adjust yourself naturally? Sorry if I'm not supposed to use this forum for curiousities, but I'm just trying to learn as much as I can about weight lifting. Thanks guys. |
|
       
|
|
01-01-2009, 09:04 PM
|
#2 |
|
Bioidentical Bodybuilder
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: .
Posts: 6,109
|
Interesting.
A few questions: Did you go below parallel on Smith? Do you go below parallel on free squats? How much and what rep range for squats and Smiths? How tall are you?
Wondering where to start? Confused? This will get you started.
Daredevils are Shredded Find out why... (Now you can find out why... in Hebrew!) UD2.Built - My UD2.0 setup. |
|
|
|
|
01-02-2009, 01:10 AM
|
#3 |
|
"King of Cheat Meals"
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sc
Posts: 1,625
|
....smith machine squats....
I'll pass on this one before I split a vein! |
|
|
|
|
01-02-2009, 09:42 AM
|
#5 |
|
100 Proof Chaos
Elite Member
|
I've squatted (relatively) heavy on smith machines before... it sucks. You are extremely limited within the movement, and yes, it limited the amount of weight I could use. Free weight is the way to go. If you feel you must use a smith, then you can try keeping your feet forward and cut the weight in half... it'll torch your quads.
|
|
|
|
|
01-06-2009, 08:09 PM
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 120
|
oh no, I'm not going back to the Smith...I was just curious
no, I was just worried about doing it with free weights...I've heard so many stories of people messing themselves up on squats when they couldn't handle the amount of weight in the position...I wanted to give myself some time to get used to pushing weight in that stance....keep in mind, only three months ago I was an only-machines, didn't-know-anything type of gym member...you know the type.....anyway, some things I didn't want to jump into immediately...the Smith definitely messed with my form (mostly because I had trouble going down enough), but it allowed me to build up some strength without worrying about my back giving out under the weight.....that's the other thing..I wanted time to strengthen my back before the hitting real squats...when I started I was an undernourished long-distance runner....I've been making sure to not get ahead of myself |
|
|
|
|
01-06-2009, 08:40 PM
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Elite Member
|
Range of motion.
|
|
|
|
|
01-06-2009, 09:54 PM
|
#8 |
|
"King of Cheat Meals"
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sc
Posts: 1,625
|
....Because smith machines suck ass thats why!
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
