either works, just lift heavy and proper
Curious what folks prefer here or if there is reason to use one vs the other?
Dumbell rows seem like the standard approach for back, but there is risk for back stress if you do these incorrectly.
Equipment -- seated cable row, seated row with chest pad, laydown row -- seem to eliminate the back issues, but I'm not sure I actually work the muscle as much as your pure dumbell row.
Comments?
Thanks.
KY
either works, just lift heavy and proper
ON A 24/7 BULK....
DB rows have you supported with the non-working hand which is why i like them better than BB rows.
cable rows are good.
chest supported rows are good (if you can get over the compression feeling on your chest).
either way, form needs to be adhered too.
patrick
Optimum Sports Performance
"In the beginners mind there are many possibilities, in the experts there are few."
-Buddha's Little Instruction Book
Surprised by the responses.
If they're all equal in terms of benefit, I'm tempted to drop the two hand , bent over dumbell row. It just seems to put more stress on my lower back. And since I ruptured a disc down there a few years ago, I'd rather not continue down this path if an equal alternative exists.
KY
Optimum Sports Performance
"In the beginners mind there are many possibilities, in the experts there are few."
-Buddha's Little Instruction Book
I only do two rowing motions right now, but I love them both.
T-Br row - 5x5 (I love lifting heavy with these)
Seated Single Arm cable row - usually 3x8 or 3x10. Strongly controlled movement the whole time
Is T bar row a seated row with cable with the wide grip bar?
KY
DISCLAIMER: