I've been doing a bit of thinking about this lately:
What are the advantages of bilateral movements?
Recently I've been using a lot more unilateral movements (e.g. DB presses, split squats, single leg RDLs) and it's seemed to help with balance/core stabilization more than the bilateral movements I used to do like back squats and SLDLs. I've really grown to think that unilateral movements are much more beneficial to overall functional strength.
So why do most people working out use bilateral movements? Every time I go to the gym, most people are doing these while working on core strength separately. It would seem most people could really benefit from doing more unilateral work.
to me there is alot of advantages to both sides, with like DB presses you work alot of your stabalizers, not to mention your making both sides push the same weight, which helps alot with balance, as where with straight bars you would be pushing more with your dominant side. but with straight bar presses you work alot of different muscles-abs,delts, pecs,tris. i really love using DBs, and doing stuff like split squats, ill even stand on one leg and do shrugs or stand on right leg and do a shoulder press with my left. they both have there benifits just mix it up every once in awhile.
Well, dumbell presses aren't unilateral movements as you're pressing with both sides? They require more stabilization than BB presses, yeah, but they are still bilateral.
Do some single arm DB bench presses, they're great.
But yeah, you've got it - unilateral movements require balance and stabilization, and a stronger side can't compensate for a weaker side.
The range of motion is also usually greater, for example with overhead press. If you're doing an overhead press with a barbell compared with a single armed overhead press with a dumbell, the ROM with the DB can be a lot more, which is always good.
The advantages of bilateral movements are that they recruit a lot more muscle at once, you're stabilizing an overall heavier weight, and because of those two things they require a lot more coordination and nervous activity at once.
Both have their advantages, so both should be used.
Disclaimer: All health, fitness, diet, nutrition, anabolic steroid & supplement information posted here is intended for educational and informational purposes only, and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice from a medical doctor. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. If you choose to use AAS it's your responsibility to know the laws of the country that you live in. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website.
How do bilateral movements recruit more muscle at once? I would think a unilateral movement would recruit more muscles, since it requires much greater stabilization from other muscles not necessarily involved in the movement.
DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.