w8lifter
Elite Member
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by irontime
I'm pretty sure that I've read in an anabolic review guide that after the orals have passed throught the liver that they are dramatically less potent than what they could have been in injectable form. Does that sound familiar to anyone?
Originally posted by Belial
gopro- injectable dianabol, reforvit-V for example, isn't really less effective than oral dianabol. I haven't seen any experiences that would suggest this, beyond the high volume of bunk reforvit out there. Now, if you mean non- 17-aa dianabol, well, that's boldenone.
I also haven't seen any conclusive studies showing greater nitrogen retention etc. with injectable vs. oral winny, there's one study floating around where the injection protocols were so different that they make the conclusions moot.
Regardless of route of administration, winstrol is always 17-aa, is always harsh on the liver, etc. This is one of the perenially unanswerable questions, which is more effective? I would say injectable, only because it's more cost effective, (generic crap winny tabs aside), and if you don't mind ED injections, it actually results in more stable blood levels.