-
Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
-
Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex
Carrie Prejean Abruptly Leaves Larry King Interview
- Thread starter Arnold
- Start date
the porn video? not sure but I would like to see it!
I don't think beauty pageants should ask a contestant controversial social or political questions to begin with.
Just another "created controversy" by the media.
Just another "created controversy" by the media.
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Messages
- 14,833
- Reaction score
- 1,676
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 43
- Location
- In my imagination.
So she isn't really a conservative, she just likes to look down her nose at others
Looking down your nose at others behavior is the conservative way. She is just being a good conservative.
After reading a bit more on this chick...I feel for her. She evidently made the video when she was 17 for her BF and dbag sold it after she became well known...she is understandably salty and about it and you can't blame her for it. She got stiffed with a loaded political question when she was about to hit the pinnacle of her career. I am not a conservative nor do I agree with her about gay marriage, but I can understand why she has become so defensive and bitchy. I don't blame her for ditching the interview.
Its a shame she's going to sucked into a political fringe group. She's articulate and attractive, but political far sides will taint your career.
Its a shame she's going to sucked into a political fringe group. She's articulate and attractive, but political far sides will taint your career.
Wrong, she made multiple videos, and she was 20 in the one in question. Her BF came out saying her handlers wanted him to lie about her age and he refused. She is defensive and bitchy because everything that comes out of her mouth is a lie.
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Messages
- 14,833
- Reaction score
- 1,676
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 43
- Location
- In my imagination.
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Messages
- 14,833
- Reaction score
- 1,676
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 43
- Location
- In my imagination.
I love those good christian morals.
Maybe you're right. Freak in the bed, in rest-stop bathroom stalls, princess in public.
Well, she is smarter than Miss South Carolina 2007... I think?
YouTube - Miss Teen USA 2007 - South Carolina answers a question
where did you read all that? I can't say I'm well informed in the topic cause I don't keep up with the celeb gossip...regardless though, I'd still hit it
Who wouldn't?
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2004
- Messages
- 2,644
- Reaction score
- 34
- Points
- 0
And playing victim is the liberal way.
Saying that a marriage requires two consenting adults of majority age and opposite gender is no more of a moral judgment than it is to say that a sandwich requires two pieces of bread. It is definitional, nothing more.
And playing victim is the liberal way.
Saying that a marriage requires two consenting adults of majority age and opposite gender is no more of a moral judgment than it is to say that a sandwich requires two pieces of bread. It is definitional, nothing more.
Definition is relative to context and time...the same way, blacks were defined as 3/5 of a vote during elections or Native Americans were defined as non sovereign people.
That's not a fair comparison, whitey thought he was in India so they were Indians. Once we realized we were not in India, the foreign Indian invader was dealt with accordingly.
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Messages
- 14,833
- Reaction score
- 1,676
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 43
- Location
- In my imagination.
You can roll your eyes all you want, it doesn't stop it from being true. Conservatives claim to be the moral elite, but rarely ever live up to their own imposed standards. Liberals have just as much wrong with them, because any ideology is inherently ignorant. But if pointing out the faults of the liberal ideology helps to reconcile the inconsistencies of your conservative views, so be it.
And playing victim is the liberal way.
Sure, and no different than saying whites and blacks should drink from different fountains. You have a serious problem with the inability to have human empathy for others if you can't see that it is hurtful and wrong to deny rights to specific groups. Or maybe you just see gays as not human. Either way, you are a borderline sociopath, and the main reason that conservatives will die out in the next 30 years.
And wtf do you mean definitional? That's so fucking dumb. Every law on the books has multiple interpretations. That is why we have a judicial branch with a supreme court in the first place. The laws are all dynamic, not definitional. The interpretation changes with the the beliefs of the people interpreting them.
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Messages
- 14,833
- Reaction score
- 1,676
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 43
- Location
- In my imagination.
That's not true, its just an attempt to justify bigotry. 20 years ago, interracial relationships were said to be unnatural by the same type of people who are now saying homosexuality is unnatural.
Its a dumb argument. Homosexuality occurs all in nature in all sorts of species. Homosexuality is more natural than shoes and socks.
Most of modern western life isn't natural. It is fully constructed by humans with synthetic tools, materials, and methods. But, to disenfranchise someone because you call it unnatural is absurd.
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2005
- Messages
- 19,276
- Reaction score
- 288
- Points
- 83
- Age
- 38
post of the year!
I remember a few years ago there was a story, about a duck that was found fucking the carcass of another MALE duck.
I think in 1989 the majority of people still bitching about interracial relationships were in small southern towns.
I think in 1989 the majority of people still bitching about interracial relationships were in small southern towns.
Homosexuality happens in nature all the time with a plethora of species
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2004
- Messages
- 2,644
- Reaction score
- 34
- Points
- 0
You have no clue what you are talking about. You try to respond without actually contemplating what you are responding to.
I make no moral judgment about gay people. In fact, I really don't care about gay marriage - I'm indifferent on the issue.
What I do care about is a bunch of naive peacenik-wannabes trying to pretend as if they were participating in a civil rights revolution. The issue is supposedly about some minor tax technicalities and health benefits - give me a fucking break. I guarantee you if those issues were moot people would still be trying to play victim.
And the statist Democrats are capitalizing on your naivety. How many gays do you think voted for Obama based on this issue? Why don't you do a fucking google search on how many gays have been kicked out of the military under Obama's watch. Fucking statist hypocrits, and you are too foolish to see it.
The times I've been married it had NOTHING to do with tax breaks and health insurance etc. I really don't think many couple of any sort put those reasons foremost when considering becoming wed to one another. "I love you, I want to spend my life with you..." probably the number 1 deciding factor in most proposals.
