no food

[Vieope]

If someone was starving because of the lack of food and that is usually a good reason to starve. Do you think self cannibalism is better to prevent death?
Because when you starve, your body uses fat to generate energy but would it be more efficient to eat yourself? Not very much of course.

Do you think self cannibalism is better than starvation?

 

[fufu]

no.

 

[fufu]

If you cut out and eat your own tissue you are causing your body to use even more resources to repair itself.

 

[fufu]

http://www.ironmagazineforums.com/diet-nutrition/56529-worst-food-ever-2.html

 

[juggernaut]

what the fuck kind of question is this??

 

[Triple Threat]

what the fuck kind of question is this??

Typical Vieope.

 

[Little Wing]

in The Wreck of the Medusa a father wanted to feed his starving baby blood and the other passengers stopped him. i think it might have saved the baby's life. i'd have done it.


if you're starving isn't your body already trying to survive by canabalizing itself?

 

[juggernaut]

Typical Vieope.

hey jerky-no religion talk here.

 

[Yanick]

if you're starving isn't your body already trying to survive by canabalizing itself?

Yes and it is way more efficient than you could hope to be by actually eating yourself.

Plus without sterile spaces/supplies a self amputation will result in some nasty infections that will make you die a (more) miserable/quick death.

 

[goob]

what the fuck kind of question is this??

^^^^ The fully-automated Juggernaught auto response.....

 

[DaMayor]

Yes and it is way more efficient than you could hope to be by actually eating yourself.

Plus without sterile spaces/supplies a self amputation will result in some nasty infections that will make you die a (more) miserable/quick death.

Typical Yanick.

 

[maniclion]

Auto Fellatio Feed System?

 

[juggernaut]

^^^^ The fully-automated Juggernaught auto response.....

 

[Vieope]

If you cut out and eat your own tissue you are causing your body to use even more resources to repair itself.

Plus without sterile spaces/supplies a self amputation will result in some nasty infections that will make you die a (more) miserable/quick death.

Well you could easily cauterize it. It is fast and effective. No infection and the body would not try to cure it. Look at your arm that could last many days.

 

[Vieope]

Each time you took away something to eat your daily calorie requirement would be lower too because the body would not have that arm to feed anymore.

 

[maniclion]

Well you could easily cauterize it. It is fast and effective. No infection and the body would not try to cure it. Look at your arm that could last many days.

But cauterized flesh is burnt and burnt flesh will get infected easily. No if you had some maggots they could help keep it clean. But if you have a bunch of maggots better to eat some and breed the others to harvest more....

 

[Vieope]

But cauterized flesh is burnt and burnt flesh will get infected easily. No if you had some maggots they could help keep it clean. But if you have a bunch of maggots better to eat some and breed the others to harvest more....

Damn that is a totally new concept! Breeding maggots on dead flesh!

Cauterized flesh is more intense. I doubt you could get any infection if it is well done.

 

[maniclion]

Damn that is a totally new concept! Breeding maggots on dead flesh!

Cauterized flesh is more intense. I doubt you could get any infection if it is well done.

Burns take away the power to scab over so the wound remains open to germs making it more susceptible...

 

[Vieope]

But it was used for centuries to stop exactly that.

 

[juggernaut]

If a tree falls in the forest and one is there to hear it, what came first-the chicken or the egg?

 

[sara]

Vieope your freaking me out!!

 

[lola1182]

 

[nkira]

This is crazy......

 

[tallcall]

If someone was starving because of the lack of food and that is usually a good reason to starve. Do you think self cannibalism is better to prevent death?
Because when you starve, your body uses fat to generate energy but would it be more efficient to eat yourself? Not very much of course.

Do you think self cannibalism is better than starvation?

Are they starving alone or in a group? It'd probably be easier to survive in a group. I say no self-cannibalism.

If one of your friends was dying and told you to carve up his body and cook it and serve it to all your other friends and yourself just so you could see what human flesh tastes like (he wants you to expand your knowledge of humainty through his death), would you? I say yes, just to honor his last wish.

My best friend Scotty and I both jumped and shouted yes before the question was finished...guess we were just excited to try some man meat! lol

 

[juggernaut]

I saw that movie (name slips me right now)...it was where they were in the mountains and had freinds that were in deep freeze and had to eat them for survival...I'd do it. I'd hate it, be ashamed I did it, and probably fuck me up for life, but you gotta survive.

 

[nkira]

I have seen that one too....I think the name was "Alive".

Here's one real life story---> Uruguayan Air Force Flight 571 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I saw that movie (name slips me right now)...it was where they were in the mountains and had freinds that were in deep freeze and had to eat them for survival...I'd do it. I'd hate it, be ashamed I did it, and probably fuck me up for life, but you gotta survive.

 

[juggernaut]

alive-that's it. True story too.

 

[ROID]

How much wood could a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood?

 

[maniclion]

How much wood could a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood?

A fuck load.....