• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

Rich Gaspari Admits Favoritism Exists In Bodybuilding Judging

Arnold

Numero Uno
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Nov 29, 2000
Messages
82,680
Reaction score
3,072
Points
113
Location
Las Vegas
Rich Gaspari Admits Favoritism Exists In Bodybuilding Judging

Rich Gaspari talks about his past experience as a bodybuilding judge and admits there is an unspoken favoritism.

While there are specific guidelines and rules in competitive bodybuilding ? at the end of the day it is a subjective sport. Athletes are scored based off of a judges? evaluation of the physiques. It?s not based off of clear cut goals like in many other sports. Due to this, there have been a subgroup of fans and athletes who claim there are politics in competitive bodybuilding. That something more than pure physique and aesthetic is considered when the judges make their final decisions. In our latest GI Exclusive interview, Rich Gaspari admits that while there are no deep conspiracy politics afoot in bodybuilding, there is certainly unspoken favoritism by the judges.

Whenever there is a major bodybuilding competition like the Arnold Classic or the Mr. Olympia ? there is almost an immediate backlash from a subgroup of fans. People who watched the live stream and think that the judges made the wrong call. That perhaps they purposefully scored down an athlete due to ?politics.? This happens quite often in bodybuilding because it?s a sport scored by judges. It?s unlike many other sports that have clear cut points and winners. For example, football has clear touchdowns and a final score between two teams. Races have clear winners when a person crosses the finish line first.

While there are guidelines in place that the judges follow upon scoring bodybuilders ? there is still a level of subjective opinion in how the guidelines are interpreted by each judge. This is why there are multiple judges per competition and not just one. To balance out slight differences in taste between each individual judge and find an ultimate fair winner.

This still leaves a grey area between the fans and the judges. We can?t know 100% what is going through a judges head. Sometimes this leads to fans speculating that the leagues have an agenda. That athletes need to ?pay dues? before they are given a fair chance on stage.

https://youtu.be/KHy58WlyM2c
 
Back
Top