Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yet another reason to ban guns.
Wrong! Had I been there with my pistol, I would have shot him between the eyes after he fired the first shot. The lack of handguns by the innocent bystanders is why the ordeal was drawn out so far.
so if all the innocent bystanders in that mall had handguns, the outcome would be more peaceful? I think not.
It would be nothing short of a warzone.
You will never hear of an incident like this in a state where gun possession in public is legal. I wonder why.
You will never hear of an incident like this in a state where gun possession in public is legal. I wonder why.
No shit. The more your restrict guns, the more you restrict law abiding people and the more power you give to criminals.
Read this page. The page even has a bibliography.
Holy shit, how the hell do you have this info always stored?
Even fucking comic book info comes from DOMS!
Read this page. The page even has a bibliography.
Nice job! I just printed that out and added it to my anti gun-control binder.
I read. I read every damn day of every damn week. I also watch educational videos and talk to informed people (which is a rare creature).
I can't help it. I'm hardwired to want to know everything.
I originally found that particular page a couple of weeks ago.
Fox News doesn't count.![]()
Wrong! Had I been there with my pistol, I would have shot him between the eyes after he fired the first shot. The lack of handguns by the innocent bystanders is why the ordeal was drawn out so far.
back that up
First, you should back up your statements before asking others to do so.
The Journal of Legal Studies
Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School
Volume 26, Number 1, January 1997
Crime, Deterrence, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns
By John R. Lott, Jr., and David B. Mustard
Using cross-sectional time-series data for U.S. counties from 1977 to 1992, we find that allowing citizens to carry concealed weapons deters violent crimes, without increasing accidental deaths. If those states without right-to-carry concealed gun provisions had adopted them in 1992, county- and state-level data indicate that approximately 1,500 murders would have been avoided yearly. Similarly, we predict that rapes would have declined by over 4,000, robbery by over 11,000, and aggravated assaults by over 60,000. We also find criminals substituting into property crimes involving stealth, where the probability of contact between the criminal and the victim is minimal. Further, higher arrest and conviction rates consistently reduce crime. The estimated annual gain from all remaining states adopting these laws was at least $5.74 billion in 1992. The annual social benefit from an additional concealed handgun permit is as high as $5,000
The fact that you keep binders on the topics that interest you is very intelligent and very rare.
And you've gotta like the fact that there are ton of sources in the bibliography.
It would be nice if the author updated the information, though.
Nice! By the way Will, what sort of career are you in?
One little problem I find. People who are for gun control are not very interested in the facts, the data, or history. The ignore all that in favor of emotional responses combined with a total ignorance of guns. "Don't confuse us with the facts" is the anti gun/pro gun control slogan. So, you can throw all the fact based web pages at them you want, all the studies you want, and all the historical context at them, and for good measure, some Second Amend facts at them, and they will ignore it.
You just described every politically/emotionally charged topic of debate.
Granted, but it seems at its peak with the gun issue.
Meno
understand
![]()