- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
- Messages
- 32,369
- Reaction score
- 2,936
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 52
- Location
- In a van, down by the river...
I don't like his screaming style. It is obnoxious to me. Plus, some outside criticisms of him:
- (1) In January 2006, Joseph Nocera opined that the "people who are watching [Mad Money] and following [Cramer's] advice are fools." [2]
- (2) In February 2007, Henry Blodget -- himself indicted for civil securities fraud in 2002 and banned for life from the securities industry -- criticized Cramer for overstating his abilities as a market forecaster, noting that in 2006 Cramer's suggested portfolio lost money "despite nearly every major equity market on earth being up between about 15 percent and 30 percent." [23]
- (3) In March 2007, a review by CXO Advisory showed that Cramer's stock picks have done slightly better than the market averages.[24]
- (4) In March 2007, Joseph Parnes, noted short seller featured in Barron's, refuted positions by Cramer on CNBC, and has shown to his audience in his publication Shortex that using positions contrary to Cramer's recommendations is actually more advantageous
My take:
1. An opinion is like an asshole, everyone has one.

2. So? It's not like Jim is going to everybody's house and putting a gun to their heads and telling them to hit the side-lines.
3. They're probably including the Lightening Round. That's where Jim gives his very brief opinion on a variety of stocks. Or are they talking only about the first segment of Jim's show?
4. It sounds like a pundit is trying to leech off another pundit's fame.

Really though, it all comes down to two things:
1. If Jim really isn't any good, then the people will quit listening to him and go elsewhere. Money lost is money lost. Yet, this hasn't happened in several years.
2. Jim makes it clear, time and time again, that the home investor needs to do their own home work. His motto isn't "buy and hold", it's "buy and homework". Which he helps with in a one week special segment that he did for his show and through his books.
Jim never says that you should blindly follow his advice. He's said, both on teevee, and in this books, that doing so would be stupid (he's actually used that exact word on his show). Jim does what any good stock adviser does: he gives leads and general information.
Personally, I think that most other pundits dislike him simply because he's so famous. It's simply envy. I like him for the leads that he gives. I also like him because, unlike 99% of all other pundits, he actually says to do things. He doesn't just give vague ideas and thoughts about a stock, he says "buy", "hold", and "sell". He puts his reputation where his mouth is.